Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hiddenhearts

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Hiddenhearts

Final (1/4/0); ended 21:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

I will be bold and close this RfA early due to the applicants' lack of experience in editing and admin-related tasks. Detailed notes will be left on their Talk page. (aeropagitica) 21:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiddenhearts (talk · contribs) - This user wants Wikipedia to succseed, and I can tell by his/her actions. Although he might mess up sometimes, I think it is for the greater good. Hellenh 19:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept the nomination.

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I have notices somepeople put up random pages for "Fun" and I don't think that's acceptable, especially since this is an encyclopedia in the making, so I plan to help abolish this. I also want to help stop the personal attacks that many people are doing, as it is a right to be priviliged to be able to edit a page in an encyclopedia.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I am particularly pleased with lakelands Park Middle School because that was my first article, and I put alot of work into finding information on it. I am still trying to find information to add to it, and that is my main focus, to improve Lakelands Park Middle School on Wikipedia.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: That has never happened to me, but if it happens, I will think it through before I respond to their editing. I have learned from past personal experience that just because you think it is right doesn't make it right.

General comments

See Hiddenhearts's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Discussion I choose not to withdraw, as I am determined to help Wikipedia in any way possible. ~~Magistrand~~ 21:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

1.Support I support this person because although he has few edits, his contributions are well thought out, and consice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SHYAML200 (talk • contribs) This user appears to have been created solely for the purpose of voting in this RfA, and the same goes for the nominating account. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 20:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Barely any edits, the majority of which are on his/her own user page. Needs much more experience. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 20:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also suggest this be removed per WP:SNOW or the nominee withdraw him/herself, no need to prolong an RfA that is obviously going to fail. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 20:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose and suggested withdraw. Basically you don't have enough edits sorry, and you are rather new and inactive. Also question 1 shows that you are unfamiliar with what admins do. Arjun 20:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Veesicle said, Hiddenhearts has very few edits and most are to his/her userpage and Lakelands Park Middle School. Editor has been around for less than 3 months. The fact that this nomination comes from an account created today with no edits other than those related to this RfA doesn't fill me with much confidence either and the answers to the questions doesn't really demonstrate a strong grasp on policy or what being sysop'd is all about. I'd suggest that Hiddenhearts withdraw his/her acceptance of this nomination and spend a few months getting more familiar with Wikipedia before trying to become an admin.--Isotope23 20:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose - The user's answers to the questions just don't seem very thought out. And user hardly has any edits: 10 Wikipedia edits, and 0 Wikipedia talk edits, and most are to the user's own userpage.--SUIT⁴² 20:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but you just don't have the experience yet. I'd try again when you have closer to 1000 edits. Work hard, and I probably won't see a problem supporting. Gan fon 20:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.