Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Paul2387 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
FINAL (0/3/0); withdrawn by candidate (citing WP:NOTNOW) 11:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Nomination
[edit]Paul2387 (talk · contribs) – I am a possible cadidate for adminship and would do a good job Paul2387 (talk) 10:13, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: I am intending to use Huggle and AutoWikiBrowser to help me to make my editing and monitering tasks easier.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: My best contributions to wikipedia are to Reality Shows and Talent Shows as I tend to watch them and updated the relevent articles as necessary.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: I have had some comments on my talk page in the past that I understood and dealt with accordly, as an admin I would read comments thoroughly and do what was asked of me.
General comments
[edit]RfAs for this user:
- Links for Paul2387: Paul2387 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Paul2387 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Paul2387 before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
- This is a resubmission of a previous RfA I made as I needed to correct a few statements I made previously, so don't oppose me on this as I have already mentioned why I reapplied. Paul2387(talk) 10:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support
[edit]
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose 512 edits, and back at RfA just a couple weeks after the last one closed? I hate counting edits, but it's usually recommended to wait a period of months between RfAs. Besides, I'm not sure you even want to pass an RfA- if you want to use Huggle, you should be here, as Huggle requires Rollback permission, not Admin. Any Admin can give you Rollback- which is far more liberally granted than Adminship. AWB has a similar request procedure, which I believe requires 500 edits in the mainspace. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 10:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Nothing personal, but I believe WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW apply in this case. RFA is a tough process, and your current nomination will hardly make it. If what you want is rollback you better request it at the link provided by Bradjamesbrown. > RUL3R>trolling>vandalism 11:14, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Sorry, but 513 edits just isn't enough. Also, about your response to question 1, you can use Huggle and AutoWikiBrowser without being an admin. Ilyushka88 Talk to me 11:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.