Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bosna

Bosna

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 23:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Bosniak (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Bosniakk (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Legal Provider of Bosnian picture (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Provider of Bosnian pictures (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
BosnianPatriots (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Bosna (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Code letter: F.

User:Bosniak, who was blocked for reasons explained here, may be operating a sock farm to evade block. After bringing the matter up at AN/I, I was advised to request a checkuser. Asterion^talk 23:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed except for Bosniak, who is

Unrelated. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 05:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Correction; Bosna is too old. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Moved to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bosna, as that's the oldest confirmed account on the list. Luna Santin 05:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate blocks

Since it was confirmed that User:Bosniak is not behind these sockpuppets, then whoever blocked these accounts did so without justification. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Inappropriate blocks. —Psychonaut 06:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beg pardon. Nothing of the sort is confirmed; it's just that checkuser results aren't helpful in determining it. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional request

Please also check the following account against the first list. This account has been blocked or banned. If it is established that User:Bosna 101 is the same as User:Bosna, then User:Bosna and all of his socks discovered above should remain blocked.

Bosna 101 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Note: Oh, I forgot to say, Bosna was too old to have any information, as is Bosna 101. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 06:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused here. If Bosna is too old, how can all these socks be attributed to that account? Asterion^talk 08:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't be, not with checkuser. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I know who the "master account" is. Please take a look at "Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Damir Mišić" for my evidence. Thank You. —King Ivan 09:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing that checkuser can make use of, though; Damir M has been gone for too long to evaluate. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if these will be too old, but user has a history of creating "alternate accounts":
Bosoni (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Ancient Bosoni (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Ancient Land of Bosoni (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Thanks, Asterion^talk 07:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan, you're lumping together all Bosniak POV-pushers. Bosna* accounts are nowhere near Damir M's style. He was only interested in proving that Bosniak and Bosnian are synonymous, and that they inhabited Bosnia since the paleozoic, and shun away from the Bosnian War issues. I would have noticed his return, trust me. On the other dozen accounts in play, we're likely dealing with 2 or 3 unrelated people in total. Duja► 11:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry about that. A lot of them just seemed the same to me. I may be wrong about some of these, but I still am certain that Damir is Hahahihihoho/Alkalada. —King Ivan 11:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]