Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kwame Nkrumah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kwame Nkrumah}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Panairjdde

[edit]

Three Four Five Six more active socks of Panairjdde, still involved in heading an edit war on Guus Hiddink. See archive for more details. --Angelo 23:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Adding on User:TufkaPanairjdde. --Palffy 23:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Likely. Voice-of-All 21:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.



If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Kwame Nkrumah}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Panairjdde

[edit]

A number of Panairjdde socks working as usual; see archive for historical details. --Angelo 22:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Per the instructions, could you please provide the link to the block as well as any differences with the accounts? Miranda 04:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk note: The archives reveal the discussion was here. Sean William @ 04:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kwame Nkrumah

[edit]

Obvious socks of User:Panairjdde. See recent archive, same edits than before. --Angelo 00:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 IP blocked Voice-of-All 01:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latest reincarnation of well-known puppetmaster Panairjdde (aka Kwame Nkrumah). Returned as User:Tozzi Fan after block of his previous sockpuppet Fantocci. Same contributions than his previous sockpuppet, plus blatant vandalisms at User talk:Dppowell/PPP (reference page for suspected Panairjdde socks). Angelo 21:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Likely. Some IP evidence along with very strong editing similarities (sort of obvious too).Voice-of-All 23:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suddenly become active following this checkuser, he made the same exact edits on Guus Hiddink than his previous reincarnation. --Angelo 23:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A simple checkuser, just because of a clear username similarity with two of the above, as per request by a user in User talk:Dppowell/PPP. However, I tend to doubt about his association with Panairjdde. --Angelo 23:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed and  IP blocked Voice-of-All 23:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anriz

[edit]


—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kingjeff (talkcontribs) 14:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

  • Code letter: F

The latest in a long line of socks; ban discussion is here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dppowell (talkcontribs)

Red X Unrelated. Dmcdevit·t 20:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All of them are unrelated? There's virtually no question that the 81.211.x.x contributions (if not the others) were made by the individual in question. Dppowell 20:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


GrayToday

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

Another day, another Panairjdde/Kwame Nkrumah sock. User:GrayToday is the latest, and I'm sure another will pop up after this one is blocked. Dppowell 15:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now User:TermsThey, too. Dppowell 17:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and User:BriefExact. Dppowell 00:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other admins have blocked these socks (as well as an additional one, User:BirdsCover) since I filed the RFCU, but I would request that the CheckUser process be formally completed in the interest of expanding the documentation of abuse. Dppowell 16:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
User:GuideEggs is the latest. Dppowell 02:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not nearly as sure about User:Rasiel, but the types of edits and subject areas are similar. Dppowell 02:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed Need link to community ban discussion. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here, supported by the ArbCom. Dppowell 21:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed all (including BirdsCover) except Raisel. Dmcdevit·t 17:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


User:Mam't a'nut'

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

Newest sock of serial puppeteer User:Panairjdde. Account was created almost immediately after his most recent RFCU-verified sock, User:Francis Escort, was blocked earlier today. With one of the account's first edits, he re-engages the editor responsible for the previous sock's RFCU on an admin's talk page. Dppowell 00:49, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde for the discussion associated with his initial blocks in the middle of last year. There are other cases associated with the names of some of his previous socks, notably User:Kwame Nkrumah. Dppowell 01:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Merged from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/User:Mam't a'nut', same sockpupetter. -- lucasbfr talk 01:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed Jayjg (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panairjdde

[edit]
  • Code letter: F

I and others[5] have reason to believe Francis Escort (talk · contribs) is the latest in a very long line of sockpuppet accounts of indefinetly blocked user Panairjdde. His latest proved sock account was; Uyet Ustranimii (talk · contribs). (if that information helps)

Next to each username are several edits the users have in common; Uyset Ustranimii[6][7][8][9], Francis Escort.[10][11][12] [13] - Deathrocker 14:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Merged from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Panairjdde. -- lucasbfr talk 15:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Additional information needed Per B, could you provide a link to the ArbCom ruling? -- lucasbfr talk 15:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No but I have diffs showing admins indefinetly blocking his accounts.. Please see [14][15]. - Deathrocker 15:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhh, sorry if should be F not B. Fixed it. - Deathrocker 15:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Likely --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added another ip with recent edits that is very likely to be the same person. --Palffy 03:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Confirmed. Jayjg (talk) 02:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now its confirmed can we get a block please? - Deathrocker 10:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kwame Nkrumah

[edit]

The purpose of the check is to determine whether Panairjdde or Panarjedde are the same user as Kwame Nkrumah, who has been indefinately blocked. Recent conduct by Panarjedde has been disruptive:

Addhoc 16:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you read? It is written below.--Panarjedde 16:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Kwame Mkrumah is blocked as a sockpuppet of Panarjedde per his own admission on the talk page of this page, and Panairjdde is an acknowledged former account to which the password has been lost. Neither account has edited in more than 2 months. Editors who have used sockpuppets in the past are generally permitted to keep using their main account as long as they stop abusing sockpuppets and don't edit disruptively. If you have allegations of current sockpuppeting, please list the new suspects. Other accusations of disruptive editing against Panarjedde should be pursued somewhere else. Thatcher131 16:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, Addhoc 16:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined Dmcdevit·t 18:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kwame Nkrumah

[edit]

 Clerk note: Evidence and discussion moved to talk page. Summary follows:

There are two allegations. First, that Kwame Nkrumah, who was peviously confirmed using a sockpuppet, has created additional sockpuppets to avoid 3RR and to get away with other policy violations. User:Palffy, User:Cowman109 and User:Ryulong have requested this check.

The second allegation is based on Kwame's claim to himself be a sock of another editor. A comparison of edit styles and contribution histories by User:Palffy leads him to suspect Kwame is a sockpuppet of User:Panairjdde who has been blocked for 3RR, disruption, and sockpuppetry based on evidence at WP:SSP. However, admin Llywrch was convinced enough of Panairjdde's good faith to unblock him. Since Panairjdde has not has a public CU before, I'm listing his accounts, IPs and suspected socks here.

and a few others at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Panairjdde.

Thatcher131 (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: It looks like Panarjedde has admitted to all the allegations in this request on the talk page. Thatcher131 (talk) 11:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined for the moment–it appears that the matter is settled, unless anyone objects or brings forth new information. Mackensen (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kwame Nkrumah

[edit]

The user Kwame Nkrumah keeps on reverting Ukraine national football team to his/her version, and avoided a 3RR break through the sockpuppet: see edit by puppetteer and sockpuppet. Tarentum 20:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed Mackensen (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.