Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 59

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 55←Archive 57Archive 58Archive 59Archive 60Archive 61→Archive 65

Zagg

Owner of IFrogz, developer of InvisibleSHIELD[1], cited in TheStreet.com[2], abc4.com[3]. --- Trevj (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:SkyTemplate

This template is used for a tool on the Toolserver. The URL of the Tool is

http://toolserver.org/~geohack/skyhack.php

This tool is linked on more than 2000 (!) Pages in the german WP. The script has been moved before. maybe, important informations to prevent deleting have been lost at that time. Antonsusi (talk) 18:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't think, that "two weeks ago" is a well argument for "Not done" (without a view on my arguments) , when that weeks are at the end of a year (over christmas, where users are in holyday or so). The deletion request was simply not seen from me or other user of the german WP. Also, therefore there has not been a really discussion, only a request and a decide later. The damaging of a tool is a well argument for undeleting. You and any other admin here can see easyly even more than two weeks later, that this deletion was an error. Antonsusi (talk) 20:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
  • The template was deleted based on a discussion where no one other than the nominator participated, on the (apparently mistaken) assertion that it is unused. In my opinion, it should simply be restored as useful to some and harmless to all. That being said, since it's used by 'all projects', wouldn't it make more sense to be placed at meta? –xenotalk 20:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

That needs an adjust of the PHP-script on the toolserver and I've no access to the script. The last user, that has made an edit (when I remember well), was User:Kolossos. I can ask him, but as first step the template shoudt be undeleted to make the tool as quickly as possible usable. The next step is an adjusting of the script to use annother template page. Antonsusi (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Note: I've provisionally restored this template, as it is being actively used for the betterment of Wikimedia projects. I still think it should be migrated over to meta, but for now it should not be deleted. –xenotalk 14:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I wish it weren't the case, but bureaucracy is big enough here that I fear that people will object that Xeno's comment above makes him/her involved. For that reason, I redeleted the template and immediately restored it, since I've never done anything with it before nor even mentioned it in my writing. Better to obviate possible complaints than to have to face them after they're made. Nyttend (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

File:EmilymarilynKevinBreak.JPG

An email archived as ticket # 2011111410022819 in the permissions queue confirms permission from the owner of KevinBreak.com under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). -MorganKevinJ(talk) 22:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Done Please add the OTRS permission received template yourself, since I can't remember what exactly to type. Nyttend (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Grepolis

I strongly believe that page should not be deleted. In my opinion the A7 is not applicable for this case, since the mentioned article is as important (or unimportant) as the Travian, Freeciv.net, Evony or any other game from the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games. With the logic every article from List_of_multiplayer_browser_games should be given A7 and deleted.

Additionally it appears that the article has been created and deleted 3 more times in the past, which does not make sense. -LevanJugheli (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Just a comment — two of the three earlier deletions were G7 (author-requested deletion), so only the first deletion (also an A7) is really debateable. Nyttend (talk) 02:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Stina Sanders

to edit -Stinalaurensanders (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. This has not been deleted: your submission at WP:Articles for creation was declined, but your draft is still available at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stina Sanders for you to edit and resubmit. Please note, though, that Wikipedia is not a site like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves: you should read Wikipedia:Autobiography, and also WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Atlante FC logo.svg

I deleted this file from Commons, as it is a logo. It was requested that I comment this here, in case someone wanted to restore the file locally under a non-free criteria. -Cambalachero (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Done Nyttend (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Monetary circuit theory

is a valid article topic -Wbm1058 (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

I do not understand why this article was deleted. The topic is not a hoax (Google it). Several Wikipedia articles link to this article, and they now have red links. The user User:Jmckeon ie who resumed editing on December 24 after over a year hiatus, and proposed deletion on Christmas day retired from Wikipedia on New Years Day?!

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Fenwick & West

Sorry, but could not figure out how to contact admin directly. Admin removed our company's wiki page based on copyright violations, but alleged voilation was descriptive text of our company from our website. We can easily modify descriptive text on Wikipedia to avoid exact duplication of text on our website if that addresses Wikipedia's concern, but entire Fenwick & West wiki page should not have been deleted. -Rkshimako (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Gutterbirds

Could I have a copy of the source code restored to my userspace so that I can work on addressing the concerns about the page so its possible for me to move the code to a different Wiki? -Ls883 (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ls883/Gutterbirds. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

File:ZAGG Logo.png

Used in (recently undeleted) article ZAGG Inc. --- Trevj (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Julio Bryan Munoz

this article is pure fact and i dont understand that reference stuff just leave as is please -Gamehogger911 (talk) 03:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Nyttend (talk) 03:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
It has now been deleted, and will not be restored because Munoz does not meet Wikipedia's notability standard - see WP:NFOOTY for what a footballer needs to have achieved before he can have a WIkipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Atlas of UTR Regulatory Activity

The page was originally deleted because there was "No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability". Now ther is a scientific journal (Bioinformatics) peer-reviewed published article that in my opinion qualifies as an independent source. I thus ask you to undelete the page. Thank you very much. -Cibioltg (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Clignett

reasoning -Clignett73 (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clignett#Clignett http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arunsingh16 has proposed deletion of de Clignett article. Why can't there be a Clignett article? --Clignett73 (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. If you want this article to be kept, you'll have to argue against its deletion here, but please first read Wikipedia's notability requirements and the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Dale S

I was the fourth one to re-create the article. After I was done, it was said that it needed a clean-up and minutes later, they deleted the article and they didn't even give me any further notice. So, I recreated it again. Right after I was done, I refreshed it and an administrator said that I vandalised it and contested it for deletion, but after I was done making my reason of why not to delete the article, it was already deleted. And why was the reason that it was vandalised, Yeah, I may say that I re-created it, but I didn't vandalised. Instead, I was giving more verifiable resources for the article. -Oidsofipsd (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Torbjørn Agdestein

The page was deleted and i want to know why. It was accepted yesterday, but someone deleted it today. -XMaXixX (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

  •  Not done As per the original AFD, the player does not meet the notability requirements under WP:FOOTY, in part because he does not play for a fully-professional team. Just because the article for creation passed general layout, does not mean that the player meets notability requirements yet. Until such time as he meets notability requirements, I have protected the article name from creation. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Asad Wazir

This is the valid information of a singer from Lahore Pakistan who is working with industry since 2005 . -Khurramwazir23 (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

DHWANI CET

DHWANI is most popular culfest of engineering collages in kerela which is hosted by College of Engineering, Trivandrum -117.213.51.191 (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Kaseya

This page was deleted was deleted with no warning. It did not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. Please restore the page with the appropriate flags so the article can be corrected.173.45.194.71 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC) -173.45.194.71 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

I will note one of the four deletions was a prod that was deleted because it hadn't been worked on for a full year, as indicated in the log. In addition, G11s aren't going to be restored here because they require fundamental rewrites. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:11, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

PO SUM ON

Please can you re-check PO SUM ON should not have been deleted it is an official medicine that is sold worldwide.

Po Sum On was registered and officially marketed in Hong Kong in 1907. It is a multi-million pound turnover company based in Hong Kong.

Please see offical web page: http://www.posumon.com.hk/ Thanks." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.221.139 (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

empowerment evaluation

I own the copyright to the material and I balanced the discussion with critiques of the approach as well as supporters -Profdavidf (talk) 20:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

If it's been published elsewhere, we can't accept it unless it's been released under a license compatible with the GFDL and CC-By-SA 3.0. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Please communicate your release of copyright per the process set out at WP:IOWN. Even then the material may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. – ukexpat (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Three male characters of General Hospital

The page of Shawn Butler may have chances that it doesn't violate copyrights and deletion, as List of miscellaneous General Hospital characters had; I don't know how notable this character is, though. -George Ho (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC) What about the other two characters? I sure hope they do not violate copyrights of Soapcentral.com. --George Ho (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. These pages were only ever redirects to the relevant sections of List of miscellaneous General Hospital characters which was deleted at this AfD last May and deleted again yesterday per WP:CSD#G4. There is still List of General Hospital characters, and if you think these characters are worth it, I suppose you could re-create them as redirects to the appropriate section of that list. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ultimatum (American band)

Contrary to some opinions, this is an important band that does have a dedicated fan base. A simple google search should be sufficient to show that this is a legitimate band that does warrant a wikipedia page. It was not for self promotion or about a band with releases on "unimportant indie labels". In fact, their albums are widely distributed and are readily available and quite easy to obtain on many websites, most notably Amazon. Please restore this page as soon as possible. -Chilejay7 (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 Not done. This article was deleted as the result of a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Ultimatum (American band) so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be undeleted here. If you disagree with the result of the discussion, you should first approach the administrator who closed it, user Ron Ritzman (talk); then, if you are not satisfied, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 08:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Ultimatum (American band) - second request

Hello, I am a Wikipedia viewer and use the site quite often. I am not a moderator and never edit any page, so forgive me if I am doing this incorrectly. I noticed that the Ultimatum (band) page for the American Heavy Metal Band, Ultimatum was deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ultimatum_%28American_band%29 Apparently the band was taken down because, "WP:MUSIC#5 - "Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels."

Ultimatum have released records on Massacre Records, Rowe Productions and Retroactive Records. Anyone with even the remotest knowledge of the Christian metal genre which they are a part of would know that these are well known and respected labels. Retroactive Records is an active label with a roster that includes some very well known names in the CCM and Christian Metal genre including Deliverance, Bride, Saint, among many others. Rowe Productions was a label with major U.S. distribution through the Diamante Music Group. To say these are not an "important indie labels" would be an poor judgment call or show clear ignorance of the music genre.

As well, the band has a 20 year history, has performed all over the country and have been on many, many compilation albums on several different labels. They have five full lengths albums out and an EP. If the administrators that deleted the band are not familiar with Christian metal, then I respectfully ask that they not make judgement calls on what "important indie labels" are for that genre.

A quick search on Google under Ultimatum metal, Ultimatum Christian metal, Ultimatum heavy metal, or any similar title reveals a long list of articles and photos, including articles for the Associated Press: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=71JIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=IP4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=1765,9477515&dq=scott-waters+ultimatum&hl=en

Ultimatum is included in the well known printed book Collector's Guide to Heavy Metal by Martin Popoff, as well as just about every heavy metal website out there including such well known sites as Metal-Archives, BNRMetal, nolifetilmetal.com, AllMusic.com, Amazon.com, etc. Ultimatum has been featured on the cover of HM Magazine as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hm_magazine

Can you please restore the Ultimatum page. -Ultmetal (talk) 02:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

 Not done - see reply to request just above this one. JohnCD (talk) 08:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Arighi Bianchi

Substantial article about a notable institution which just needs some cleanup. It's a listed building; hundreds of books as potential sources; public campaigns of support. Andrew Davidson (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have removed a paragraph of blatant spam about the store's cafe: "the perfect spot to pause for a refreshing pitstop as you ponder your purchases..." etc. JohnCD (talk) 08:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

after today by a goofy movie

reasoning -Beastkiller1298 (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, the whole content was "The song afer today was created by A Goofy Movie. My parents love this movie and so do I." To take care of the factual info I've created a redirect from After Today to A Goofy Movie. If you think there is more to write (that you and your parents like it, which shouldn't be part of an encyclopedic article), you can either expand the music section of the movie article or create a draft at User:Beastkiller1298/After Today and then overwrite the redirect. Regards --Tikiwont (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Yo-yo history.jpg

I am trying to support the writing of a wikipedia page on Yo-yo's and this is a scan of a book printed by the company itself. I mistakenly didn't select the right copyright approval it should have been Historical Significant fair use. -ADogNamedGromit (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done. The file has not yet been deleted, although it probably will be soon as you were only using it for a talk page discussion which is not a valid reason for fair use (per WP:NFCC #7 non-free images can only be used in articles.) January (talk) 14:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Marwari Namkeens

reasoning -Marwaadwalas (talk) 05:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC) i have been informed that marwari namkeen is similar like rajasthani cuisine but there is a lot of difference between them because marwari namkeen contains different types of snack food whereas rajasthani cuisine have dishes like vegetables and Curry to eat with Indian bread call 'roti'. so please consider the fact and take your best decision.

Snow Kid

The original older article should not have been deleted in favor of a recent article with less content. Please restore the original Snow Kid article, so a normal merge can be done. -Benjwong (talk) 11:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

This is a mess. It looks like the wrong article was tagged A10 and deleted. I'll look at the histories of both articles and get back to you. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:42, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
I have already merged the usable material into Snowkid, and created proper redirects (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict) My apologies Bwilkins, I had already merged the histories before I saw your reply. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Ultimatum (American band) - third request

There is no clear reason for which the page was deleted. The band did not even create this page - I have it on good authority from the vocalist. -174.92.96.45 (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:One Day At A Time title screen.jpg

This file was deleted from One Day at a Time under grounds that the non-free image consisted of a copyright-ineligible logo. However, per WP:non-free content review#File:I Love Lucy Titlecard.png, there is a debate between replacing and keeping on the basis of (ir)replaecability of non-free title cards. There must be a recovery of this image if kept alive in admin data. Then when time goes by, this may be put under review. -George Ho (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm not clear what you're asking. What do your last two sentences mean? Nyttend (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I'll rephrase. I hope you save this file in your archives. If you undelete this file, then I may someday have this file reviewed in WP:NFCR. --George Ho (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm still waiting for you to either restore this image or leave it "deleted". --George Ho (talk) 22:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, been busy the last few days, and forgot to check back. I'm surprised that nobody else did anything. At any rate, Done The claims of PD-ineligible is plainly wrong (aerial photographs and derivative works thereof) are definitely copyrightable, but I can easily see a valid fair use claim. Nyttend (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

daytime running and fog lamps

reasoning -Rubenoff (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 

why was the article daytime running and fog lamps deleted??

If the person doing the deletion has better qualifications than I Lets see them

Grade 12 with 65 years in the mechanical trades welding and vehicle repair and rebuilding

Licensed in Vehicle repair and vehicle inspection, trained in accident investigation and accident prevention, Trained in preparation of training programmes

35 years a s a Govt fleet manager in B.C Canada responsible for operation of 20 major repair facilities and hiring and training staff, ordering replacement parts and replacement vehicles and disposal of surplus equipment, preparing annul orders for all supplies elated to equipment operations

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? I've tried several permutations and come up empty. Fixed malformed report. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Not done and will not be done That was not an article, that was a pair of links to YouTube videos. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:29, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Bishop J. D. Husband

reasoning -Tophthemetalbender (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 01:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Crazy_Monkey_Defense

reasoning -41.213.68.35 (talk) 04:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:17, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Steveprutz (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at Articles for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Manterror

Please userify so I can work on it. Thanks -Mathewignash (talk) 06:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mathewignash/Manterror. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

ayesh pruthuv kahawala

I want to get my details back -Ayesh.kahawala (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

DOA Tactical

requesting userfication, mistakenly created outside of my user area - my first attempt at an article - I have now gathered all of my notability references and was coming back in to complete the article. Sorry for screwing up the authoring process, trying to learn. -Phil801 (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Phil801/DOA Tactical. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Jude Mahoney - Heroes of Florence

This article was intended to be used to add additional legitimate information with which to be able to contact schools, so that we could deliver workshops and possible lessons. We have no website for the time being and this was to provide that function. Given that there are many other authors/organisations on here that DON'T state WHY they're on here, we feel that this treatment is grossly unfair and shortsighted. -Lascorza (talk) 21:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Peridon (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Comment: You say: "We have no website for the time being and this was to provide that function", but Wikipedia is a project to build an encyclopedia; it is not a webspace provider, and is certainly not here to help you promote a series of books of which the first has only just been published. See WP:COI and WP:NBOOK. Myspace would be more suitable for what you want to do. JohnCD (talk) 23:12, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Spacecataz

Revert PROD so content can be merged & page can be redirected to main article Aqua Teen Hunger Force without loss of edit history -Cybercobra (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Dale S (Singer-songwriter)

It had been said that I created it and was deleted due to vandalism. The question is, how can you call it a vandalism, if the writer itself was the only one who edited the page, and it was only edited once. Okay, there is also the reason of creating hoaxes, why do you call it a hoax? The singer is real, it had already released 2 singles and is actually signed by a record label. -Jfskdfjksdfhjksd (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done. This is a hoax supported by fake references from other user-generated content sites. January (talk) 10:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Facility Management Diagnostics

reasoning -RobertGBrooks (talk) 22:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.feapc.com/m2/Services/FacilityAssetManagement/FMDiagnostics.aspx. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:19, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Cannon Club

Most responses on deletion discussion favored keeping the article, with those proposing deletion not responding to the latest finding/opinion that the outside coverage was sufficient and the article met the standards set forth in the GNG. -YoungLochinvar (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannon Club, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Drmies (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

ColorGHear

reasoning -Goanna300 (talk) 23:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


Dear Administrators, While I am a national journalist with Australia's ABC as well as a media lecturer, I am not really familiar with the style you consider "encyclopedic."

ColorGHear: PROD; notified Goanna300 (talk · contribs) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Reason: non notable plugin, no references, written in a very unencyclopedic style

A later post-deletion log item described the item as advertising.

Please let me explain. I originally saw this item as of intense media interest: A video colourist has developed a series of settings for someone else's software. He seems to be claiming intellectual property rights for these settings, although he has not so far produced anything which seems to be patented. The intriguing question is whether colours in moving images can be something which can be patented. Will users of motion picture settings (Hue, saaturation, brightness, etc) one day have to pay for using them? Add to the film's credits the following, "Colour settings (c)20011 ColorGHear inc."

Now, this was a collaborative Wikipedia item which was evolving well. I had started it off saying, "it seems to be some sort of plugin for [Adobe After effects]. Someone else contributed the line "..is a collection of presets" Someone [else] added some complementary info about the advantage of these settings. I edited this all, deleting my remark about plugins and re-positioning the "collection of settings" line to the top. Finally, I added the tag, "Citation Needed" to the complementary remark or definition - because, although that remark may have been over--complementary, its contributor deserved the chance to quote his/her sources.

Isn't that how Wikipedia works?

I have no personal opinion of ColorGHear. It looks impressive, subjectively - but video colourisation can often be made to look good at first. We needed a professional colourist to test and review ColorGHear's settings. WHich was why I wrote that the product[?] had not yet been reviewed.

Well the nomination for speedy delete with A7 was clearly invalid as this is not an article about a company. There was one quote that looked promotional. Are you happy with putting the page in your userspace until you can find enough independent writings about it? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Hazel Estella Barnes

Photo use authorization was granted by owner -24.8.102.71 (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

It seems to have been asserted that the photo of Hazel Barnes was not authorized by the owner. However I assert that the photo was taken by myself, Reed Lindberg, in my home, on Hazel's 92nd birthday. My wife, Betty Cannon, is Hazel's literary executor. We were contacted by a Wikipedia representative and granted use of the picture. You may contact me for further clarification. Reed Lindberg

Not done. First, thank you for your willingness to donate this photograph. Please see Wikipedia:Donating_copyrighted_materials#Donating_your_photographs, which provides instructions for sending documentation of your permission to the Wikimedia Foundation. This is to protect your rights and to ensure that someone claiming to be you cannot "donate" your intellectual property. If you email permissions-en@wikimedia.org a letter of permission as described on that page, an admin from the OTRS office will restore the image and mark it as having been verified. --B (talk) 16:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
FYI, the image in question is File:Hazel BarnesPicture.jpg. Nyttend (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Freq Nasty

The page was a valid 3rd party-created page about an internationally known artist who is referred to in many other Wikipedia posts. I will be honest that I am an interested party (he is my boyfriend) but I know that he didn't create the page, and we are not sure why it was taken down. He has enough "notability" to have a page, as he has been putting out music for 14 years (see Discogs.com) was just profiled in DJ Weekly http://www.djmag.com/news/detail/3077 and his new EP featured on The Untz among other places. These and other reliable sources can be included to improve the page, if it were put back up. Thank you. -99.14.160.199 (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Done In general, I would be inclined to say no: you have a conflict of interest (COI), and the page was deleted as blatant advertising — we almost never restore pages deleted for that reason. However, because you've been honest about your COI and because you've supplied what seem to me to be reliable sources, I believe that COI won't be a problem. Moreover, the page didn't really qualify for speedy deletion as blatant advertising: the most recent revisions were definitely promotional, but advertising-related speedy deletions are only supposed to be performed when the entire page history is advertising, and the earlier revisions definitely weren't promotional. Please be careful to follow our COI standards and please do your best to remain neutral in everything you write in an article; if you do both of these things, I believe that the article will turn out well. Nyttend (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Xiaomi Tech

please help me to restore the page to my userspace so i can merge info in the version which being speedy deleted to the current version -C933103 (talk) 21:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

May I know why this request receive no reply of done or eill be done or will not be done? — Preceding unsigned comment added by C933103 (talk • contribs) 10:53, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Done - well not quite, I have restored the history and if you go back before October 2011 you can see what is there before the speedy delete and merge content. The lack of reply here is because people here are volunteers and can choose what they want to do. I did not respond earlier as I had to edit with my non administrative account due to using an iPad (and that device only showing blank histories for Wikipedia pages and not being able to use delete or undelete). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Marc Ecko

Can anyone explain what's been going on with this article? It's been speedy deleted three times and restored twice in the past few months. I don't think there's any doubt that he qualifies as a notable figure, but I can't find much in the way of discussion about the deletions or restorations. -Eureka Lott 05:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

  • See Freq Nasty, the thread just above this one: long after the article was created, someone added spam, and soon afterward it was tagged and deleted under G11, even though most revisions didn't have this problem. Nyttend (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Callum Driver

Speedy deleted as being the same as a deleted article. It wasn't as subject had gained 'notability' since original deletion -Egghead06 (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Child sacrifice in Uganda

the alleged copyright infringement does not apply as I am the author of the original article published on http://africaoutreach.blogspot.com and at the end of the article I have put a copyright notice allowing for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. -Cawsocia (talk) 07:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Sceptre/script/rfa.js

I like JavaScript -BrandonSkyPimenta (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

 Clerk note: This page was deleted on Sceptre's request. I heavily doubt an admin will entertain an undeletion request without his consent, especially for someone who has two edits in almost as many months. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 15:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
  •  Not done Although "I like JavaScript" is not typically a good reasoning for undeletion, I will respond that as per the above, the editor who created and hosted the script requested its deletion - which therefore falls under WP:CSD#U1. Undeletion of someone else's tools at their own request will not be entertained (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Canadian School of Kuwait (CSK)

reasoning -Vanessa1000 (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

This article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian School of Kuwait (CSK), and that is where you should present your reasons for keeping the article. The issue is WP:Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 16:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Azim Wardak

reasoning -AfghanUS (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, you have deleted the page Azim Wardak even after I have added two references. Can you please undelete this page ?

Thank you very much.

Sincerely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfghanUS (talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 January 2012

 Done. I have fixed the first reference to point to the page that actually mentions him. Can you provide a reference to verify the third paragraph? If not, per WP:BLP it should be removed. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Consumer Debt Relief

reasoning -Cdrexpert (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note WP:Conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Grepolis

When I accessed this article it was little more than a stub, so I expanded it with accurate information (from my head) and intended to come back to it to improve it later (with proper sources), and I left a note on the talk page explaining this. But then the article was 'speedy deleted' on notability grounds, and now I can't improve it at all. What I left there was very much a work in progress - I know it didn't yet meet Wikipedia standards - but it was better than what it replaced, which is why I did it, and I would like to have the chance to establish notability. Please could it be restored to my namespace so I can improve it? Thank you. -Kimelea (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Kimelea/Grepolis. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. ~ Kimelea (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Remember a Day (2000 film)

This film exists as well as all the references. To start with check: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0279367/ -CatWizard777 (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remember a Day (2000 film), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 08:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

The Orange Illusion

this band existed with a very well known line up, histrionically all is correct as well as references - believe this page was sabotaged -CatWizard777 (talk) 06:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orange Illusion, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kudpung (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 08:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Institution of Technicians & Engineers(Kashmir)

Dear Sir, It is to request you to that this page is of fully Non-Profit Organisation, of Kashmir India which is in its initial stage and is in need for recognition so that the trouble hit kashmiri youths who are unskilled get the information about skill possesion and the future prespectives.So it is requested to not to delete this page as it is spreading the knowledge to 1000's of kashmiri youth who don't have acess to basic technical education due to its political reasons etc. which world is aware of.

Kaiser Farooq -Jullious11 (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Jaume Cañellas Galindo

Jaume Cañellas Galindo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [revisions] This is one of the best child psychiatrists now living. The older article has been deleted due to reasons that the last translation ( Spanish Wikipedia ) no longer exist.

The previous two attacks for deletion have been aggressively offensive (difamatory) and shows a special interest by Catalan separatists (Independentists) to attack the character. Surely because is a defender of universal human rights and equality in the world (especially in Spain). The character is a human rights activist in the world of psychiatry and child and adolescent. Spokesman of various organizations on childhood and adolescence and leading figure in the promotion and dissemination of mental health of children and adolescents throughout the world. Especially in the Spanish-American countries, where it is a referent in psychiatry and mental health.

The character is a philanthropist, activist for the rights of children and non-profit organizations and Ambassador for Save the Children Spain.

If such prominent figures like this do not deserve an article in Wikipedia, as we maintain the quality ?

Surely we must improve the translation, but not delete it.--Winterfree2000 (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaume Cañellas Galindo (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Eastern nagari script

the need for this article exists -Chaipau (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

The article was created after a discussion by a number of Wikipedians, given here. The need for a "parent" article still exists, and even more so because the Maithili script too is similar to these scripts. Chaipau (talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The section you mention also explains nicely the problem with creating something on a WT page for some perceived 'need'. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:New York Giants helmet rightface.png

It is the Team Logo -NYGFan (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done This was deleted per Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_December_20#File:New_York_Giants_helmet_rightface.png. Please review the arguments and contact the deleting administrator Fastily (talk · contribs) if you have further doubts.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:New York Jets helmet rightface.png

Also as it is the team logo, someone who does not like NY teams must have deleted them. -NYGFan (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Done Welcome to Wikipedia where we're currently on a drive to delete everything related to New York. For what to do see above. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

SPACESEED band wiki

Regards. Please undelete the Spaceseed band wiki. The article was still under construction and is all factual and relevant. References will be provided. thanks jp -Johnpack1 (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spaceseed, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Arbitrarily0 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Before you do so, you best prepare a referenced draft at say User:Johnpack1/Spaceseed. Since the original article was around since 2009, but most of it ripped from the band's site, I'm reluctant to userfy the deleted version. If there are original contributions of yours, let me know and I'll mail them. But the main point is sources that show it might be notable.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Ribbon (group)

Japanese band which released 12 singles and 8 original albums (and at least 6 compilations), most of them ranking in the top 20 of japanese oricon charts (ref : singles ranking, albums ranking) -86.68.60.81 (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Messianic Israel Alliance

This page was deleted because it was termed to be about an organization that was not deemed relevant enough to have a wikipedia page, while several other organizations in similar size and scope in the same area are still active. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Messianic_Jewish_organizations for an example of those organizations. -Staein (talk) 21:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_59&oldid=1142568406"