Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anantam tripathi/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Anantam tripathi

Anantam tripathi (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

17 October 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Doug Weller talk 07:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed  Blocked and tagged -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Weller (talkcontribs)


10 November 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same editing area. [1] [2] [3]. Substantial overlap for a very new account [4]. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Doug Weller:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Doug Weller: Thanks for pointing out that mistake. I've fixed it. Adding more diffs [5] [6] [7] [8]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Happens to me using copy and paste at times. Doug Weller talk 10:32, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

I presume that it is Kalbhoj being referred to. CU doesn't show a link. Doug Weller talk 08:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because Kalbhoj posted an unblock request at UTRS appeal #81120 (mentioned above by Blablubbs), I investigated the editing history, and found far too many connections between that account and others for there to be any doubt about the sockpuppetry. By the time I had finished my investigation, Yamla had already declined the appeal, with the comment "Sockpuppetry is established and is confirmed and is not in doubt". It seems to me that there is more than enough consensus among administrators & checkusers that sockpuppetry is proved, so that I don't see any need for a further CU, but I will leave the request open for a clerk to decide. JBW (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • JBW, just in case you aren't aware, you can reserve a UTRS appeal and keep it reserved for some period of time while you investigate. You probably knew that already, I just don't want to snipe a ticket you are already looking at. I don't see a need for further checkuser investigation here but if anyone disagrees, please ask. --Yamla (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yamla: Yes, I did know that. I usually don't do it, for several reasons, but perhaps it would be worth doing more often. Anyway, on this occasion, although if I had done that it would have saved some duplication of effort, not doing so has provided the advantage of independent reviews confirming the same conclusion, which may be considered an advantage. JBW (talk) 14:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • My keeping this open wasn't because of uncertainty about whether my result is accurate, but because I wanted to explore some additional avenues to make sure there are no other socks. Having done that and found none, I'm moving, tagging and closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 15:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

26 March 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

All the above users indulge in a same pattern removing and adding information according to their POV with RAJ and Unreliable sources pages related hindu castes especially brahmins , like gaurs , kanyakubja , sanadhyas , paliwals , saryupareen etc also some historical figures like hemu according to the Sitush [WP:RAJ]. Now see their contributions [murrey] and now see the contributions of [[9]]. Another thing is they editing random wiki articles with small edits so that they can built their repo on Wikipedia. Same thing was did by previous socks when I revert them the start the edit war. Dinkar 108 (talk) 09:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Seems like some sort of sock/meatpuppetry is going on. But User:Andy murrey is a new one. I believe the sockmaster to be one of these - Doremon9087, Anantam tripathi or Prince Of Roblox]. CU requested. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the filer has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Doremon9087Prince of Roblox(?). Schrödinger's jellyfish  06:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anosurfer is seemingly socking now! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 12:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
and is blocked, nevermind 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 12:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
and most likely are

07 April 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Donald567 (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 April 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

User User:Banabhatta I and User:Ekdaliann fan both are same person reverting their vandalized edits and vandalizing other articles with out source. Banabhatta I reverted the edits of User:kashmiri to the edit of his previous sock User:Kalnemi. This user currently have 3-4 more sock accounts and mainly push their POV caste version i.e. of Kanyakubja Brahmins. As you already know who I am , I just want the admins that don't block me and allow me to help to counter this sock as I am able to find that there are 2 people also with him. I will never edit any article I will just counter this sock by SPI of telling in the talk page of patrollers. Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 05:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

10 April 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Only ever edits to the encyclopedia were removing the CSD template from the article created by a sock, removing a random image from said article (likely irrelevant but here for completeness), and removing the speedy nomination from the nominator's log. DrowssapSMM 23:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 09:28, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

25 May 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Edits are Kannauj/Kanyakubja related

  • Bhatta Narayana I Restored edits [11] reverted by @Bbb23: [12] of a confirmed sock [13].

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 November 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Account created after Munawwar Zaidi was blocked for socking by Bbb23.

Totally same restoration at Panchala Kingdom (Mahabharata),[15][16] and Āryāvarta.[17][18]

Almost same restoration at Pañcāla.[19][20] Also restoring his past edits on Sengar.[21][22] Capitals00 (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

13 November 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Recreating multiple articles previously deleted under G5 such as Pandit Shivdeen ([23]) and Bhava Brihaspati ([24]). The creation of Notable Kanyakubja Brahmins also fits the sockpuppeteer's caste POV pushing. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:29, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]