Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BessieLoo/Archive

BessieLoo

BessieLoo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

26 November 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Torseput (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Only contribution is same questionable edit as blocked user: [1] (BessieLoo, 4 days ago), [2] (Torseput, today) Fru1tbat (talk) 14:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05 December 2019

Suspected sockpuppets

Beom92 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User's only contribution is same edit as previous accounts: [3] Fru1tbat (talk) 20:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged ST47 (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

30 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Fongpi (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Luckiloo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Single-purpose accounts continuing campaign to change BLP article with dubious evidence, refusing to engage in real discussion. One user claims to be family member, another claims to be former schoolmate, both obviously working toward the exact same goal (Fongpi already blocked; including here to attach to existing case). [4][5]. . Fru1tbat (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized I mistyped the sockmaster's username - can an admin clean this up if needed? :/ Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 16:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fru1tbat, Looks like that was taken care of here. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Clerk note: forgot to note that I corrected the name of the case. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 18:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Weird that somebody would spend two years obsessing over what year she was born, but this vs this is pretty clear evidence, not to mention the similar user names. Rosalind Chao was previously semi-protected for a couple of weeks; I'll re-protect it for longer. Blocked and tagged. Closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]