Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Charles lindberg/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Charles lindberg

10 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Editing same article infoboxes, creating series templates and editing odd articles like Erin O'Toole makes this obvious. Both accounts interested in the same political and military articles Editor Interaction Analyser.

Conservative Party of Canada
Charles lindberg -(unsourced no consensus)
Medicinehatter (rv to sourced version) - great term use by new editor.
Infobox data of military service record added by both
Charles lindberg (added honorary military record to infobox)
Medicinehatter (added military service record) - nice technical addition by new editor.
Loves adding side bars with no edit summaries - Alberta separatism
Charles lindberg
Medicinehatter - knows how to make series template and trancludes it on their first day.
Related links
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/96.54.184.11/Archive
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive289#Page moves
Moxy (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Looks very convincing to me. GoodDay (talk) 17:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

09 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Charles lindberg - master account.--Moxy (talk) 03:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The two cases are  Confirmed. Please merge to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Charles lindberg and retag.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done and closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

01 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


right back to his old templates .....does not try to hide anymore....edits side bars that only socks have edited....even made a new one.

Charles adding his sidebar that got him banned in the first place.
Davidlevin4 adding the same thing.

User:Bbb23 what do you think? --Moxy (talk) 05:41, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed + Zagreb44 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


05 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Started editing right after the most recent block here; massive editing overlap with previous socks including Canadian politics topics and alt-right figures. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


13 August 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Brand new account making minor opinion edits about particular nationalities on various Canadian topics, whose 11th and all subsequent edits have been to Faith Goldy, one of the Canadian alt-right personalities this sockmaster likes to frequent. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Thanks for checking. "Possible" doesn't really give me confidence for a block, assuming I know where the sockmaster typically edits from. There's an arb sanction on the target article now anyway, this is probably safe as a "wait and see". Closing. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

25 October 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

It's just a sneaking suspicion. The editor's first activity seems a bit too advanced for a new editor: using their own sandbox and editing a map. It is reminiscent of the area of interest that recent confirmed puppet Clubintermiamifan had, so I'm just being cautious, specifically since how recent it is to Clubintermiamifan's block two days ago. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Red X Unrelated, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]