Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hazar Sam
Hazar Sam
Hazar Sam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
24 December 2024
[edit]
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tortino66 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Shpah elnour (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Same behaviour and writing style at Talk:Randa Kassis and connected pages. See also here 1? 2, 3, 4 Psychloppos (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I have been accused by Psychloppos of being the same individual as Tortino66, I want to state unequivocally that this accusation is unfounded. This issue arose after I noticed that Psychloppos was engaging in defamatory edits on the Wikipedia page of Randa Kassis. Upon carefully reviewing all the articles cited, I found no evidence to support the claim that she has been labelled as pro-Assad by the opposition. In fact, her page references credible sources like RFI, France 24, Spiegel, and others, which confirm her active role since 2011 in forming coalitions against Assad. Numerous additional sources in Arabic and French further reinforce this.
As a woman, I am acutely aware of the challenges Randa Kassis has faced. In the Arab world, strong and outspoken women often become targets of misogyny. Her willingness to address controversial topics and challenge societal norms has undoubtedly drawn criticism, particularly from those who seek to undermine her achievements. This pattern of attack against powerful women is sadly all too familiar.
Her connection to Russia has been well-documented by respected outlets such as the Wall Street Journal and other publications. However, these references do not support the baseless accusations made by Joseph Bahout. It’s important to note that Bahout, a Lebanese academic, made these claims without presenting any supporting evidence. In revising her Wikipedia page, I ensured neutrality by citing credible and official sources, including findings from the Mueller investigation, which directly contradict the allegations against her.
Despite this, Psychloppos continues to assert his views without providing evidence. He also misrepresented secondary sources—such as widely recognised news articles—as primary sources, which undermines the credibility of his edits. This practice not only misleads readers but also contradicts Wikipedia’s guidelines for reliable sourcing.
I urge the administrators to approach this matter with fairness and impartiality. Wikipedia is a platform I have long respected for its commitment to neutrality and credibility. It is disheartening to see these principles compromised by personal bias and unsubstantiated claims. I hope this issue can be resolved in a manner that upholds the platform’s standards and ensures the accuracy of the information it provides. Hazar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazar Sam (talk • contribs) 14:23, December 25, 2024 (UTC)
Given this diff, they've exposed their IP directly. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 22:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve exposed my IP because I have nothing to hide—I’m an open book, just not a very exciting one. Yes, sometimes I comment without logging in (who doesn’t enjoy a little anonymous fun?), and this IP is mine, but all the others? Nope, not me. I can’t wait for the checkusers to confirm what I already know: I’m just one person, not some IP-collecting mastermind! Huzzah HS (talk) 22:53, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]I've added Shpah elnour as a possible sock, same SPA promotion of Kassis, and am requesting CU because without technical corroboration I don't think there's enough to block.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've blocked 2A02:C7C:AAE0:5600:0:0:0:0/64 for one week. Bbb23 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Named accounts appear to be technically unrelated. Izno (talk) 00:10, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Closing with no further action. Bbb23 (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)