Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JJdawikieditor/Archive
JJdawikieditor
- JJdawikieditor (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
23 May 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Yinyangdraon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor is IP hopping to continue edit warring, adding unsourced content and refusing to discuss in talk page. When the editor gets enough warning, he or she simply move to another IP address. Note the overlap in articles edited, for example, Lion Dance, Snow Lion and Gimmick (professional wrestling), List of examples of convergent evolution, articles on dogs, etc. - [1][2][3][4][5]. There appear to be a lot more IP addresses, which were used just for a while and then abandoned. Some edits are identical or near-identical - for example [6] and [7], as well as these similar edits [8] and [9], [10], [11].
Hzh (talk) 01:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Added Yinyangdraon who may be the actual sockmaster but has already been blocked. Hzh (talk) 01:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Not a ton we can do here. I've blocked JJ (mostly for housekeeping purposes, since the account hasn't edited in months), but none of the IPs have edited recently and there don't seem to be any practical rangeblocks here. If they're IP-hopping this much, page protection might be the right way to go. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
13 July 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
IP hopping editor who continually edit war, adding unsourced content and refusing to discuss. Currently doing it in Epicanthic fold. It is possible to tell they are the same person by the overlap in articles edited with other socks, for example, Lion Dance and Gimmick (professional wrestling). Near identical edits with other IP editors - [12], [13] and [14], [15]. Hzh (talk) 07:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Is it possible to temporarily semi-protect Epicanthic fold as well? It seems to be the editor's latest interest, over 40 edits are by that editor and their reverts, and it doesn't look like ending. Hzh (talk) 18:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done -- RoySmith (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated. Hzh (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Done -- RoySmith (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is it possible to temporarily semi-protect Epicanthic fold as well? It seems to be the editor's latest interest, over 40 edits are by that editor and their reverts, and it doesn't look like ending. Hzh (talk) 18:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- As noted in the archives, blocking is not going to be effective, so I've semi-protected the most frequent targets:
03 October 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Jjdawikieditor103 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Near identical user name to the blocked user. Similar edits as before to other IP editors (those IP addresses weren't blocked as it was considered impractical to range block those) - [16] and [17], [18] and [19]. Hzh (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Administrator note - Jjdawikieditor103 has been 
Blocked and tagged as a suspected sock of JJdawikieditor based on behavioral evidence. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:55, 3 October 2021 (UTC)- Added missing tag for master (JJdawikieditor) -- RoySmith (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
28 October 2021
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Similar edits as previously blocked socks - compare [20] with [21]. Currently the editor appears to be interested in adding (and edit-warring) unsupported accusation of famous people being framed in Frameup. Hzh (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- The IP is already blocked for disruption - nothing more to do here, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 12:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
28 March 2022
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]Similar or partially identical edits as previous blocked editors - [22] compared to [23][24][25]. Also similar articles edited - Lion Dance, Epicanthic fold [26] (it was decided to protect pages rather than block due to the large number IP addresses involved), List of examples of convergent evolution [27], etc.. Hzh (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- The IP has been blocked for adding unsourced content, so I'm closing this off. Come back if they start up again when the block expires (or just ping the blocking admin). Girth Summit (blether) 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
22 October 2022
[edit]Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]IP addresses used for long term edit warring, for example on Epicanthic fold [28], [29], [30] (already blocked), [31] On Lion dance [32], [33][34], or Snow lion [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. All IP addresses traceable to Australia. Hzh (talk) 11:32, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- Probably not worth blocking the IPs, but I semi-protected the three noted pages for 6 months. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Noting for the record that the 123.243.90.209 IP was still active, so I have blocked that for a bit. Girth Summit (blether) 18:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)