Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KnowIG/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


KnowIG

KnowIG (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
07 May 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

This IP is continuing the exact same behavior that User:KnowIG is taking part in. mauchoeagle (c) 23:57, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Very possible it is also this blocked editor User talk:194.66.216.40 as they have jumped in with the same edits when the account is only a few hours old. Mo ainm~Talk 00:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A case of oh dear I got reverted, must be someone who done it before. Grow up. I am not in anyway a relation to either of said accounts on here 2.103.0.227 (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

I'm sorry, but checkuser does not generally disclose connections between IPs and named accounts. TNXMan 00:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Painfully obvious sock was blocked by Edgar181. Kuru (talk) 20:19, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

New account created and began agressively editing tennis/sports related articles one day after I blocked his last IPsock and opened a rangeblock. User is familiar with editing and is edit warring with the same people as KnowIG. Significant overlap of articles, including an edit here which updates an old edit from KnowIG (here). Sweep for sleepers would be nice if this is him. Kuru (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
 Checkuser note: - Highly  Likely; no obvious sleepers found (with low confidence on the effectiveness of that sort of check in this case).  Frank  |  talk  11:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

22 June 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

DerBorg suggested that 2.97.74.57 was very similar to 2.97.70.35 (by their contribs), who was blocked for evading the block on KnowIG. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 19:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

It was certainly him. He was blocked and has long since rotated off that IP. The IP has been tagged to assist in future range blocks; not sure there's anything else to do. Kamb (talk) 21:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

24 June 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

New user editing tennis articles, as blocked user User:KnowIG did, and one of the first things they did was post an unblock request at User:KnowIG -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Sock blocked, KnowIG's userpage now full-protected. –MuZemike 22:55, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


05 July 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

same range of anon ips and disruption of several tennis articles. KnowIG has ravaged the tennis articles for quite awhile now so I was on the lookout. It would appear he is also using ip 2.98.199.130. See record at Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_KnowIG. Thanks Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

07 July 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Tennis articles, switching between multiple anon IPs with 78.147.??.?? Fyunck(click) (talk) 16:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Clerk note: Moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/78.147.29.55. Elockid (Talk) 17:51, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note IP blocked 1 week. Elockid (Talk) 17:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


08 July 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

editing same articles Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Also  Confirmed as KnowIG:

Account blocked as well as 78.147.0.0/16, all articles created deleted per WP:CSD#G5. –MuZemike 21:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


14 July 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

pretty much everywhere right now Fyunck(click) (talk) 10:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

The IP has been blocked, so I think we're done. TNXMan 13:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


04 October 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


I suspect Special:Contributions/78.147.29.130 this is user:KnowIG as it geolocates to the UK, is interested in tennis and British content. It is involved with editing high level articles on the first day. --LauraHale (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Confirmed plus:

Articles created through WP:AFC have been deleted per WP:CSD#G5, plus an additional article that I missed from a recent previous sock. Several IP ranges have been re-blocked. –MuZemike 00:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


07 November 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Edits in the wheelchair tennis area on articles that KnowIG has been sock blocked include:

Filing for Laura Hale. Alexandria (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

Edits in the tennis area on articles that KnowIG has been sock blocked include and where the above IP was just rolled back:

--LauraHale (talk) 21:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

78.147.176.0/20 has been blocked 3 months, while 89.240.160.0/20 has been blocked 6 months. A few articles have also been semi-protected. –MuZemike 14:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

9 December 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Special:Contributions/2.97.70.207 is contributing to articles that User:KnowIG has contributed to. The IP address is related to this account is in the same geographic area. There are several edits only to this area. --LauraHale (talk) 09:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

23 April 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Same types of articles, same combative behavior (many towards the exact same editors in the past), same edit warring, and same WP:OWN problems as the banned user in question. Please compare with User:Dotdotdashdash, User:Game, frame, set. Also compare [4] and [5] with [6], [7], edit summary, edit summary, edit summary, [8], [9], and edit summary.

Also please note the same exact behaviors has resumed not even two weeks after the indefinite block on GAtechnical (talk · contribs) and other related IPs. --MuZemike 00:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Sorry for the long delay. :/
I agree that your analysis showed a strong connection, and  Confirmed match with

(good thing that you listed that account, information in archive and wiki is outdated). Amalthea 21:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


29 April 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Continued disruption immediately after User:Socialhistorian2013's sock block. --MuZemike 11:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]