Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ninnemanne

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ninnemanne

Ninnemanne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ninnemanne/Archive.


15 December 2024

[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See Draft:Sandeep Valluri, which is identical to the previous one created yesterday. Yet again, this blocked user is using a WP:LOUTSOCK to get around their block. Ironically, this user asked to be unblocked only this morning - see User talk:Ninnemanne Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also their edit summary of real word real cinematographer please not banned is very telling... Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:37, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 December 2024

[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The users are practically the same name, and both users are trying hard to create the Sandeep Valluri article. See User talk:Ninnemanne for previous warnings re the article, which has been deleted at least twice, and Talk:Sandeep Valluri for the latest attempt. SunloungerFrog (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]