Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Off2riorob/Archive

Off2riorob

Off2riorob (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date July 7 2009, 22:21 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

Evidence submitted by Rebroad

[1] --Rebroad (talk) 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users: Additional information needed - Are there any suspected sockpuppets we can check against? There's a lot of work we'd need to do if we're to find out who this could be a sock of, otherwise. Steve Crossin ^{The clock is ticking....} 22:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

- Bad faith nomination, since Rebroad is edit warring with Off2riorob over two BLP articles. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )

Current status –

Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by Rebroad (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Clerk declined - CheckUser is not for fishing. Tiptoety ^talk 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Additional information needed: Please provide a code letter. SPCUClerkbot (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a suspected sock here, and some evidence perhaps? Nathan^T

Conclusions

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

I am closing this witch hunt as a bad faith attempt to win a dispute between Rebroad and Off2riorob. Tiptoety ^talk 22:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Report date April 5 2010, 02:18 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

173.120.203.243 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Vexorg

I believe IP 173.120.203.243 is Off2riorob attempting to avoid being seen to edit war at article Rothschild family. Vexorg (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

I would have appreciated a note that this investigation had been opened. I think most regular editors know which general area I am located and it is not in the USA. For the check user, I have recently removed my previous objection to checkuser for such fishing type reports and now have no objection to being check usered at any time. Off2riorob (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

This wasn't a bad faith report by my self. I genuinely believed that the IP was an other editor trying to avoid a 3RR by logging out to revert. Vexorg (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )

Current status –

Declined, the reason can be found below. Requested by Vexorg (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Administrator note Appears to be a bad-faith report, as Vexorg and Off2RioRob are currently engaged in an article dispute. Checkuser is also not for fishing. TN X Man 14:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk declined per CU policy which states The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. You guys definitely seem like are in a content dispute. Elockid ^(Talk) 15:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.