Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pear-Jack/Archive
Pear-Jack
- Pear-Jack (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 January 2015
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Pear-Jack (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- .Encyclopedia-account (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Encyclopedia-viewer (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
apparent accidental post as IP, Pear-Jack removes IP post, and then re-posts as himself. Pear-Jack has the same M.O. as .Encyclopedia-account/Encyclopedia-viewer who were already blocked for sock puppetry. – 68.7.95.95 (talk) 06:44, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- 60.231.214.62 (talk · contribs) and Pear-Jack (talk · contribs) were brought to my attention just recently. Pear-Jack was blocked per WP:NOTHERE, and I agree the IP is likely the same editor and have blocked it for a week for block evasion. This editor appears to have their undivided attention devoted to deleting the article on Zeitgeist. I, JethroBT drop me a line 13:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Accounts tagged, closing. Mike V • Talk 19:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
18 January 2015
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Justmakingacomment (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- The_dirty_fruit_show (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Justmakingacomment's "why is zeitgeist even on wikipedia?" is the same as confirmed sock .Encyclopedia-account's "I think it's safe to say that bullshit zeitgeist doesn't belong on wikipedia"
The_dirty_fruit_show's "anyone who is pro-zeitgeist should be immediately banned" (even if I agree that we'd be better off without them) is the same as Pear-Jack's "any defenders should be deleted/blocked right away because it's becoming too many to even count".
Same axe to grind about TZM, same inability to understand that just because we don't like a subject doesn't mean we're gonna delete the article. CU for sleepers. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]- It is
Possible the two accounts listed above are related to Pear-Jack. Tiptoety talk 15:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC) - Per the similar behaviour/POV, per previous socking, and per "possible" technical links, I have
Blocked and tagged both accounts (tags as checked but not confirmed). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
24 April 2015
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Delete-zeitgeist-from-Wiki (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Quack quack, quack quack. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Administrator note Delete-zeitgeist-from-Wiki has been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of Pear-Jack. Thanks for the report. I, JethroBT drop me a line 03:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
28 April 2015
[edit]- Suspected sockpuppets
- Ugene86938 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Nteryourusername (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
The usual calls to delete the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Added Nteryourusername for the usual. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
[edit]Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
CheckUser requested - 
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - To compare Ugene86938 and Nteryourusername with each other and with Delete-zeitgeist-from-Wiki per this: [1][2][3]. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Based upon the technical evidence, Nteryourusername, Ugene86938, and Delete-zeitgeist-from-Wiki are
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Unfortunately it's not feasible to check for sleepers. The behavioral evidence seems sufficient, so I've blocked the accounts. Mike V • Talk 21:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)