Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rosanacurso/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Rosanacurso


13 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_%28meal%29&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tea_%28meal%29&action=history

Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I think CU might be beneficial in this SPI to confirm UA and/or IPs. Perhaps a sleeper check as well. --Addihockey10 e-mail 18:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please may you explain why you submitted this case? ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 18:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you are asking me why.... It appears that there are about 30 sock puppets disrupting Tea (meal) and its talk page with irrelevant edits. Violation of WP:SOCK. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I checked the contribs and I saw that but just to know exactly why you posted this Investigation. ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How long does this take? JuanfraNY is still active, having moved to the Green tea talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Green_tea&diff=prev&oldid=418913722 Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And there's a new one, Lsanchezs01 Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Checking this was a mess, but here are the results:

 Confirmed as each other:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Likely as Rosanacurso

All others listed in the original list of reported socks which I did not mention are  Possible and going to  Likely when factoring in behavioral evidence and edit patterns; that pertains to all of the accounts reported in this case. The guy is clearly wardriving, as he is searching out different various wi-fi networks in the same geographical location with several different devices. The technical evidence is a bitch to look at, but I think it's much to look at this with the behavioral evidence and see that they are all the same person. In other words, I would block 'em all. –MuZemike 23:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

16 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

--Addihockey10 e-mail 22:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Thanks, everyone, but there is a new one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Tea_(meal)&curid=19337173&diff=419156475&oldid=419070404

Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten DeltaQuad to archive the old case and I've re-added the unblocked sockpuppets to "clean-up" the case page. --Addihockey10 e-mail 22:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almost identical pattern of editing (Encarna10, Aneeceiza, Tamara.suarez.alumno.ite), preoccupation with Iberian matters and the UK, and disruptive discussion instigation at WT:FOOD. Pyrope 00:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Note that I keep on adding SPs to this list, even after HelloAnnyong blocked some of them. The problem is ongoing and has not stopped or slowed down. It is just spreading to other Talk pages. If anyone has a better idea of where to report this, please let me know. They do not seem interested at AIV. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
There is not going to be a rangeblock possible here. As I said in the previous SPI case, the user is wardriving, which involves different ISP and networks, with IPs all over the entire CIDR spectrum. –MuZemike 19:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just put on my Clerk hat and changed this to declined per MuZemike. KnightLago (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Closing this due to socks being blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there is a list of a dozen that haven't been blocked. Contacting HelloAnnyong to see what he ment. -- DQ (t) (e) 13:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think it might be somewhat beneficial for a CU to be involved in this case as if the user is wardriving, the IPs should be in the same geographical area. --Addihockey10 e-mail 02:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That won't tell us anything. When your moving around from Cafe to Cafe you could catch anyone for just being in the same city and we could get a lot of collaterial damage by trying that. Then watch the AUSC/BAS come after someone for trying this. :P -- DQ (t) (e) 02:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
19 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

additional SPs showing same behavioral pattern as previous ~50 SPs of Rosanacurso. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
20 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Maybe it is slowing down though! Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
21 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
22 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Could I suggest an autoprotect for WT:WikiProject Food and drink/to do? It has been hit multiple times, it is still attracting SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Socks blocked. One underlying IP CU-blocked. –MuZemike 16:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
24 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Could I also request that Talk:Tea (meal) is semiprotected again? The protection lapsed today and the page has already been hit twice--this page gets hit more than any other. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Talk:Tea (meal) semi-protected 1 month. Please keep watching the Sandbox. –MuZemike 16:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

25 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note All blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 20:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



26 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Semi-protect Talk:Public House? Has been hit three times. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Blocked. I don't think there is enough right now to semi-protect Talk:Public house. –MuZemike 20:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



27 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
29 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
30 March 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


01 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Blocked. Elockid (Talk) 19:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

02 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
03 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
03 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
03 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
05 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Clerk note: Blocked and tagged by MuZemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 18:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

06 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Banned user is still here--same behavior. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Yes, that is Rosanacurso, alright. That article may also need to be semi-protected if the disruption continues. May I also add to please check the user's edits for copyright violations and RevDelete them if need be; it is of my observation that this person does not know English. –MuZemike 22:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

07 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
08 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 20:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Pyrope 21:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
13 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Note that a previous sock was named Cursotic. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

And tagged. --Addihockey10 e-mail 14:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


14 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
No sleepers found, underlying  IP blocked. Courcelles 18:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
15 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

All users blocked and tagged. --Addihockey10 e-mail 22:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
16 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
17 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Al igual que otros socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

CalderonLillyA is Red X Unrelated. However, Juanfran2009 and IsabelGG (talk · contribs) are clearly and unambiguously socks of Rosanacurso. Moreover, I have semi-protected Tea (meal) for an additional month for continued disruption. –MuZemike 20:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also blocked is Tarea2 (talk · contribs). –MuZemike 20:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two more added. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note copyright violations from User:Canadenca. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note copyright violations from User:Kakayy. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

no Declined – Obvious socks are obvious. All we can do is continue to block and tag and semi-protect. –MuZemike 20:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note All other unblocked accounts are now blocked. Elockid (Talk) 19:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 02:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
25 April 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same name as previous block sock, Canadenca, also concerned with British foods. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
09 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Similar pattern of edits as other socks: sandboxes, WikiProject pages, and interest in tea/tea the meal, with just slightly inappropriate edits. Last time, the socks started on Tea (meal) as well. Somewhat similar name to other socks. Also, like many of the other socks, was first registered on eswiki. Coincidentally, Rosanacurso started in March 2011, one year ago. Last time, Rosanacurso and dozens of socks made hundreds of edits over weeks. Let's catch this one early. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Unfortunately, all of the data in the archive is  Stale. TNXMan 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Similar edits (sandbox, project page, tea-related, British food) to other socks, with just slightly off-topic content. Similar name (Ite) to many other socks. Like many other socks, also started on eswiki. See entry on Irenita84 for further comments. Let's do something about this one early. Last March, there were hundreds of SP edits of this kind (see archive). Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

As expected from before, Rosanacurso is wardriving again, so nothing can be accomplished by CU'ing. However, obvious socks are obvious, so I have blocked them. --MuZemike 00:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


same pattern as other socks: tea, sandboxes, England vs Spain. Request semi-protection of Tea (meal) and Talk:Tea (meal). Last March we had several hundred edits of this type. Let's nip it in the bud. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Done – sock is also blocked. --MuZemike 00:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


11 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

similar behavior as other socks: sandboxes, off-topic comments on obscure talk pages, British topics. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

I have blocked Manelmoreno, but I am not certain on Ciorolp, so I have left that account unblocked for the time being. --MuZemike 17:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Translating the above, that is most certainly Rosanacurso and has been indefinitely blocked. --MuZemike 17:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


11 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

tagging same page as previous sock, still on tea in England. Request semi-protection of Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/tasks which has now been attacked twice Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
12 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

like other socks: sandbox and tea Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
14 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same pattern as other socks: sandboxes, tea time, British culture. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


15 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

sandboxes and Britain (London), slightly off-topic comment on Talk page Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


18 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

similar name to other socks, use of sandboxes, off-topic comment on Talk page related to cuisine Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


18 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

tea and sandboxes Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

All socks have been blocked and tagged. --MuZemike 22:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

same pattern: sandboxes and British cuisine/beverages. Suggest semi-protection of Talk:Public house, which was also hit last year. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

no Declined – Just block the darn socks and protect whatever needs to be protected. Rosanacurso wardrives all over Spain, so there is no purpose in doing any checking. --MuZemike 18:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

20 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Same pattern: sandboxes and off-topic edits to Talk pages for British culture Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Sock blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


20 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

See contrib. Same pattern as other socks: sandboxes and British cuisine. Request semi-protection of Talk: Public House due to repeated vandalism (second hit in two days). Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Sock blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


22 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Sandboxes and Talk pages on British cuisine topics Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


25 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

see contribs. Tea time, sandboxes, and Spain--like other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


26 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Same as previous socks, sandboxes and British culture. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

All blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 14:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious sock: See contribs. Talk pages, British vs Spanish cuisine. Request semi-protection of Talk: Fish and Chips as it has been repeatedly hit. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
23 April 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


See contribs. Similar pattern of edits (sandbox, Talk page comments that do not refer to article, comparisons of English and Spanish cuisine and culture) to previous socks. Previously hit Talk page. Logical Cowboy (talk) (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Blocked (not checked). Elockid (Talk) 22:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rosanacurso/Archive&oldid=1079420480"