Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shecose
Shecose
Shecose (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
09 January 2025
[edit]
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]- Bolly ka Badshah (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Alain2op (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools
Will be making an WP:ANI report as well. The page Toxic (film) has been bludgeoned into the mainspace numerous times since mid-last year, initially starting with SOCKS from the farm StayCalmOnTrees. User Bolly ka Badshah has done so twice today, the second time under a different name (Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups), attempting to avoid it being seen. In addition to the deletions under various names and moves to draft space, the two editors mentioned here are editing the same two drafts within minutes of each other, indicating a targeted effort (how would one know it was created under a separate name without some type of coordination). Also see Draft:Toxic (2025 Indian film) and Draft:Toxic (2025 Film) (other variations have been redirected or deleted). Also adding user:Alain2op who is an SPA and created the page Toxic (2025 Film) in November. CNMall41 (talk) 08:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note that Shecose just moved Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups back to mainspace within minutes of it being draftified. Clear effort on the part of these accounts. If not SOCKS, then definitely MEAT.--CNMall41 (talk) 08:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was online and editing the article while you moved it back again to Draft, against the Draftify guidelines. You have drafted it multiple times without any reasoning and have outright forwarded the article without any discussion, even though it was edited by multiple editors. This is not collaborative; it's just driven by your ego. Shecose (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hard to see the reasoning since the redirects from the drafts have been deleted due to your bludgeoning moves. However, there were multiple declines of drafts (same film, various titles). --CNMall41 (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then when I asked you why you didn't send it for deletion discussion, which is mostly the right thing to do without involving both of our egos, you just tried to scare me away with 3RR, SPI, ANI, and whatnot. Shecose (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hard to see the reasoning since the redirects from the drafts have been deleted due to your bludgeoning moves. However, there were multiple declines of drafts (same film, various titles). --CNMall41 (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was online and editing the article while you moved it back again to Draft, against the Draftify guidelines. You have drafted it multiple times without any reasoning and have outright forwarded the article without any discussion, even though it was edited by multiple editors. This is not collaborative; it's just driven by your ego. Shecose (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- And now Shecose (with 40 edits) is citing a policy that no newbie would know. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:34, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's your assumption. It's not that difficult to search and learn things with a functioning brain. Shecose (talk) 09:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- This film's teaser has just been released, and fans are looking for information everywhere. So, it's obvious that multiple people will be excited to work on this article. Did you open this investigation because two people were working on the same article at the same time? Shecose (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Your are arguing notability in an SPI case but have not once denied using multiple accounts. I would also assume this is you editing from an IP.
Comments by other users
[edit]- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.