Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/philscirel/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:philscirel

[edit]
philscirel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

philscirel

Report date February 6 2009, 16:49 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Adoniscik(t, c)


The IP geolocates to Columbus, OH, as does all of philscirel's puppets. Eranist and Absdefghii were created after the IP got noticed, and has similar editing patterns/summaries: repeated, persistent whitewashing of Fethullah Gülen. I request they be checked, and the ban applied to philscirel be extended to the socks.

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Adoniscik(t, c) 16:49, 6 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]


philscirel is blocked, and evidence above suggests that eranist is the same user. Apologies if I am mistaken.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Conclusions

 Confirmed Currently available technical and behavioral evidence indicates that the following accounts and/or IPs are related:

 Stale

 Likely Currently available technical evidence indicates that it is possible and behavioral evidence indicates that it is likely that the following account is related to those above:

-- Avi (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.




Report date February 14 2009, 16:11 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Adoniscik(t, c)


More of the same by philscirel (talk · contribs), who has been permanently blocked for evading sanctions. Eulogizing of Fethullah Gulen by inexperienced editors; insistence on reversion to a whitewashed version of the article. The pattern is pretty consistent by now; a cursory check of previous sock submissions should suffice. A new tactic is that the socks have started to make useless edits to other articles in order not to be appear to be focused on just the Gulen article, which is really what they are here for. --Adoniscik(t, c) 16:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

YusrSehl has placed a remark on an AnI were (s)he shows very specific knowledge of the history of the article, by providing a link to an edit over a half year old; and about 450 edits ago. See:[1] This user account is only active since Feb 13 2009; so such detail knowledge of an article history makes me highly suspicious this is not a new editor at all. Arnoutf (talk) 19:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Adoniscik(t, c) 16:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]



Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Blocked Melitop (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) as an obvious sock/SPA. --Kanonkas :  Talk  16:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. 
Synergy 21:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Conclusions

 Confirmed YusrSehl. Dominic·t 21:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/philscirel/Archive&oldid=1138682579"