Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations/2011-06-10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Permission plausible. Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. Edit summary asserts that the article creator produced the website. Anthem 09:42, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. As far as I can tell, no infringement. "Source" link is now dead, nothing on wayback machine, no google hits for sentence fragments. Article has apparently been written using a Spanish source. BelovedFreak 20:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Please somebody check this one, as I wrote the article so have a clear COI. However, I didn't even see the "source" while writing, and there only seems to be superfcial similarity on the duplication report. BelovedFreak 18:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is indeed a false positive. Hut 8.5 21:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]