Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dhammafriend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Dhammafriend

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Dhammafriend (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Bodhidhamma (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Truthlover (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Evidence

All accounts are new. All accounts have similar names of similar etymologies. They have been editing the same articles Indian Buddhist Movement,Indian Caste System,Hindu,History of Hinduism, as well as their respective talk pages. The aggressive and insulting tone used by the accounts are 100% identical as you can see here, here and here.As far as User:Truthlover,while he pretended to "calm things down" between his fellow socks (as a facade) he then went on to push the same anti-Hindu POV by moving Indian Caste System to Hindu's Caste System(fork article speedily deleted), which is part of the agenda of users like User:Dhammafriend, which is why I suspect him to be a sockpuppet also.Hkelkar 20:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

All three socks have rabidly anti-Hindu views (see edit summaries of their edits in history page) and my talk page here, and here, as well as on the talk pages of the socks and sockmaster, all of which are the same wording used by new users with very similar names (as an aside, the word "Dhamma" and various other Neo-Buddhist concepts are used or alluded to in all three of the user names)Hkelkar 20:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what Mr. Hkelkar is trying to proov here. Insted of having healthy conversation/disscusion/argument by providing supporting documents/references/arguments he is trying to get me out so that he can continue with his Hindu right-wing propaganda. If Mr. HKelkar has valid points please provide documents, I will take my arguments back. When a person does not have valid reasons/documents/references he starts doing what Mr. HKelkar is doing.(Threats/blocking/using administrative contacts pls refer[1][2]) I call it hypocritism. The only way to proov your POV is through perception,inference and valid testimony. Without that any knowledge human gains/shares/distributes is useless/meanigless.

--Bodhidhamma 20:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dhammafriend is Truthlover Dhammafriend (and Truthlover) has completely reverted [Indian Buddhist Movement[|this page]] to how it was prior to his/their ban. He/They did not only remove the navayana concept, which he/they question but also all the citations that cleared up citation neccessity's. I have reverted the page to how it was prior. Thegreyanomaly 23:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is also important to note that "they" reverted the 'official-style' referencing back to their informal previous citations, they also removed claims of dubious assertions and etc. the proof is [[1]], [[2]], [[3]]

Interestingly. TL reverted it to just DF left it before his ban. --Thegreyanomaly 23:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Please take this to WP:RFCU. Iola k ana•T 16:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]