Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Thorpfilms
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Thorpfilms (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
Jaymesthorp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
YoutubeMarketing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
aBSuRDiST -T ☺ C- 18:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
These accounts are the only contributors to Jaymes Thorp which was previously deleted. Each of these accounts has been used to remove speedy delete tags from that article. They have made edits to nearly no other articles. Below are some links to relevant evidence.
diff from Youtubemarketing diff from Youtubemarketing diff from Jaymesthorp Warning for Thorpfilms
- Comments
The case for sock puppetry seems clear to me. I also believe Jaymes Thorp should be salted.
- Oh, and not to mention that Jaymes Thorp and Thorp films have "thorp" in them. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, yes that too. Although the YoutubeMarketing account disturbs me more, because it seems he's pretending to be a YouTube employee.-- aBSuRDiST -T ☺ C- 22:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and not to mention that Jaymes Thorp and Thorp films have "thorp" in them. Cheers, JetLover (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The Jaymes Thorp article was speedily deleted, and as a result the diff links above do not work. This user might give up now.-- aBSuRDiST -T ☺ C- 14:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
Obvious sock/meatpuppetry. The puppet accounts have been indef-blocked. I warned the main account but did not block it. I also salted the target page, which should take care of things. MastCell Talk 17:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]