Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 June 29
June 29
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted per CSD G2 (test page) by User:Nancy. Non-admin closure. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 20:27, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Template:Christian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Self-referential template, for which the parser throws out a large red error "template loop detected". Not sure what the intent was, since there are no edits past the initial contribution. Yngvarr (c) 19:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Corrupted template. (That should be a speedy category.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - It probably should be, but I'd reference G2 in this case. --Izno (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was redirect to {{WikiProject Video games}} JohnnyMrNinja 05:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Template:WP MMO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
First off, the template is redundant to Template:WikiProject Video games, as the MMO WikiProject was redirected in favor of WikiProject Video games, with only one task force saved.
There are still links to this template which will need to be gone through; I propose that they either should be completely removed if there is already {{WikiProject Video games}} on the page, or switched for {{WikiProject Video games}} if there is not that template on the page. --Izno (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - I am unsure whether this should be posted on WP:VG's deletion page. As for other pages, there aren't really relevant talk pages other than that (in my opinion) that notice should be posted to. --Izno (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Replace with {{WikiProject Video games}} per nom. If the WikiProject no longer exists, the template has no purpose. Terraxos (talk) 04:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - Pretty much a speedy, this template was lost in the shuffle of the MfDs. Once it is de-populated, it can safely be deleted as an unneeded redirect. JohnnyMrNinja 05:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was Deleted by User:Gwen Gale as a redundant and unused template. Non-admin closure. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 16:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
I believe this is an unnecessary template - the templates in WP:CTT are sufficient. — Somno (talk) 04:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Template:YahooGroups (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
External link template, probably spammy. 1 use in 1 article. Thetrick (talk) 03:26, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Yahoo! groups aren't supposed to be linked to since most require registration to view the content (and therefore violate WP:EL). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Template:YJFL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Mostly redlinked template with no main article. 1 use in 1 article. Thetrick (talk) 03:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom: apart from all the redlinks, this isn't even a notable football organisation, so definitely doesn't need a template. Terraxos (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Template:Zechs Marquise (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Navbox for a band. Only 1 link besides the to the band article. Unused. Thetrick (talk) 03:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, redundant and unused. Terraxos (talk) 04:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete WoohookittyWoohoo! 06:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- Template:ZakaDistrict (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Navbox for an administrative district. Has no links to anything but the district article. 1 use in 1 article. Thetrick (talk) 02:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not a useful template. Terraxos (talk) 04:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.