Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2016/October

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Proposals, October 2016

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

Moths v. 293

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Trying to break out Category:Crambinae stubs.

{{Ancylolomia-stub}}/Category:Ancylolomia stubs (74)

Trying to break out Category:Hadeninae stubs.

{{Caradrinini-stub}}/Category:Caradrinini stubs (68)
{{Hadenini-stub}}/Category:Hadenini stubs (90)
{{Mythimnini-stub}}/Category:Mythimnini stubs (68)
{{Orthosiini-stub}}/Category:Orthosiini stubs (76)

Going to add to this. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Ha! Looks like I proposed some of these months ago and forgot about it. Ignore the ones that are blue links; they were already approved further down. Still going to add to this later today. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Added four. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Golf men's major championship stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was propose for deletion.

We have 4 stub templates for the men's major championships ({{BritishOpen-golf-stub}}, {{PGAChampionship-golf-stub}}, {{USMasters-golf-stub}}, {{USOpen-golf-stub}}) which have long since lost any useful purpose. There are largely unpopulated and, anyway, we already have {{Golf-tournament-stub}} and {{US-golf-tournament-stub}} which are used for other tournaments, including Women's majors, and which can readily be use for the Men's majors too. Compare: 1932 Women's Western Open and 1932 PGA Championship. Both end up in Category:American golf tournament stubs. Can someone delete these 4 templates or should I propose on WP:TFD myself? Nigej (talk) 07:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I'm fine with combining them. South Nashua (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Question: shouldn't {{BritishOpen-golf-stub}} be upmerged to Category:British golf tournament stubs? Her Pegship (talk) 23:07, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fantasy writer stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Fantasy-writer-stub}} would be the equivalent to {{sf-writer-stub}}, but for fantasy writers. There are over 300 potential articles on which this stub template could be used. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:33, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Support. I'm pretty sure this was floated recently. Her Pegship (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
Ok I would like to make the stub lower dir for lower dir articles that are stubs.

Category:Union_Councils_of_Lower_Dir_District Category:Tehsils_of_Lower_Dir_District Constituency_PK-94_(Lower_Dir-I) Constituency_PK-96_(Lower_Dir-III) Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I understand that "constituency" and "geography" aren't interchangeable concepts, but recently a slew of upmerged templates were created for Category:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa geography stubs and no one has seen fit to sort *those* yet. I suggest that task be accomplished first, before political sub-types are proposed. Her Pegship (talk) 04:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Activist stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hundreds of articles would benefit from the {{environmentalist-stub}}. Searching for only those articles currently tagged with {{activist-stub}} and Category:Environmentalists, there are over 120 articles. Scanning through the list of articles at Category:Environment stubs, there are more articles here. Should be a speedy. giso6150 (talk) 13:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Support template; support category if you can find 60 stubs for it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:46, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Done category created and 88 articles tagged so far. giso6150 (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.