Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Chile–Pakistan relations

Other stuff exist policy

On the "Other stuff exist" policy of Wikipedia against AFD, Wikipedia:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS#Deletion_of_articles, I would like to point out that Chile–Israel relations already exist. Any reader can judge for him/herself, that the Chile–Pakistan relations article is much better written, cited and more important (given Chilean huge investment in Pakistan mining contract) compared to Chile–Israel relations. So if Chile–Israel relations is being kept, and keeping in view a through disucssion I have already provided below, I request that that the Chile–Pakistan relations article be not deleted.
Consider another article Chile–Haiti relations. I dont see any basis for this page. Because all what the Chile-Haiti page is telling is the presence of embassies in each other countries and 650 Chilean peacekeepers in Haiti. Thats all!!!
Estonia – Sri Lanka relations is being kept, when in fact trade between the two countries is just a meagre US$2.5 million, and very basic and naive information about trade and diplomacy.

(Jalal0 (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

if you don't feel these articles are worthy please nominate instead of whinging. LibStar (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Response

Chile and Pakistan are considering signing a Free trade agreement (see the updated article). Apart from this Chilean mining companies having 2 major contract in Pakistan, including the Reqo Diq and Thar coal field. Both these are large scale projects which has the prospect to generate 10s of billions of US$, and provide Pakistan with huge energy resources.
If trade and diplomatic contacts are not out-of-the-ordinary, then help me understand whats out-of-the-ordinary? Your out-of-the-ordinary notation only sounds very abstract.
If anti-Islamic policies from non-OIC countries means condemnation from OIC, see (The Middle East and North Africa, Volume 50 By Europa Publications Limited, p 1339), then the converse that pro-Islamic policies invited favourable consideration from OIC is natural logic.
I can guarantee there are more Jews than Pakistanis in Israel This statment does not prove that all Jews are Israeli.
all Jews have a connection to Israel - Prove it!!!
Thirdly, the Israeli Government will strongly defend Jewish interests worldwide. If the Israeli government will defend Jewsih interest worldwide, then lets make it clear that Pakistan more strongly defends the Muslim interest worldwide through the OIC.
Converse to your statements from an unreliable blog of 15,000 Jews in Chile, there are 4,000 confirmed Muslims in Chile. I can also guarantee there are more Muslim than Israelis in Pakistan. Just as mine these statments prove nothings, your statements about Jews and Israel proves nothing.
if you do a search here mfa.gov.il/MFA/Treaties/Amanot.htm you will see Israel has 9 agreements with Chile including a trade agreement. Most of the agreements are pity agreements like AGREEMENT ON TOURISM COOPERATION, AGREEMENT FOR AIR SERVICES BETWEEN AND BEYOND THEIR RESPECTIVE TERRITORIES, AGREEMENT ON THE WAIVER OF THE VISA REQUIREMENT FOR HOLDERS OF DIPLOMATIC, AND SERVICE PASSPORTS. Do Israel and Chile have a free trade agreement or are there any discussion for any Free trade agreement between the 2 countries? How much investment have Chilean companies made in Israel? On the contrast Chilean companies have already poured in US$200 million in Pakistan, and no corporate company would make such a huge invetment if it does not see the project running in billions. Eventually it is expected that the Chilean investment in Pakistan (in future) will run upto US$4 billion.

(Jalal0 (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

this article is not about Chile-Muslim relations. not all muslims are Pakistani. there currently exists no trade agreements and the US$200 million includes a Canadian company. again you are WP:CRYSTAL balling the future bilateral relations. if you want to talk about Israel further please use the talk page. LibStar (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During the conversation Netanyahu invited Pinera to Israel for the signing in the near future of a free trade agreement between the two countries. LibStar (talk) 03:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]