Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The People's Cube

Unheadered query

What possible reason could there be for deleting reference to a satire page? Get a sense of humor, folks! Or if you don't appreciate the humor, leave things be for those who do, please. — RonaColorado (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC).

One of the beauties of Wikipedia is its vast and widespread source of information for the people, events and organizations that are far to often lost in the crowd. It is really what makes Wikipedia so unique and so frequently trafficked. I am not sure why or how the removal of information about The People's Cube serves anyone. The satirical website exists. The creator exists and is a person pf interest. I can't get into the weeds about the standards for which Wikipedia has adopted. All I can say is that more information is always better than less information. A website that exists solely for the purpose of offering information does not serve itself or its frequent visitors by limiting its information. BrianH1972 (talk) 08:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)— BrianH1972 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

@BrianH1972: please see Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability to get a better understanding of why mere existence (in any case, not just this) doesn't warrant an article. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯