Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Archives/2018/June
Appearance
This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Deletion review. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move 6 June 2018
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not done; capitalized references on the page have been downcapped. Dekimasuよ! 19:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deletion review → Wikipedia:Deletion Review – The name of the forum is “Deletion Review,” with a capital “R,” on the page itself. Interqwark talk contribs 13:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Moved from RM/T. Should be discussed. –Ammarpad (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- What is there to discuss? Either the “R” in the title of the article is capitalized, or the “R” in the body of the article is decapitalized. Interqwark talk contribs 14:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose, ain't broke, don't fix it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:19, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Andrew Lenahan: Page titles and the topics they cover should be consistent, shouldn’t they? Interqwark talk contribs 14:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Andrew Lenahan. The current title has worked just fine for 15 years. Surely we have more productive things to be worrying about. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Just be bold and change the captial letter in the page text. Compare WP:AFD, which states "Articles for deletion (AfD)" and not "Articles for Deletion (AfD)". Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:04, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- I would’ve done that but thought that it would be incorrect; however, I agree with your comparison with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. I’ve decapitalized “Deletion Review” on the relevant pages. Interqwark talk contribs 19:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Syntax highlighting breaks XFDCloser closedrv.js?
It looks like the new syntax highlighting breaks User:Evad37/XFDcloser. Anybody else noticing that? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:07, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I don't use XFDcloser but other issues are reported at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Syntax highlighting will no longer turn off / Forced into 2017 Editor. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm an idiot. I meant User:Lifebaka/closedrv.js. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:47, 17 June 2018 (UTC)