Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rajput

May I just point the the members of the ArbCom to User_talk:Dbachmann#Proposed_remedy, and to User_talk:Fred_Bauder#proposed_remedy. Furthermore, I must say that I find comments such as The Epopt's words highly inappropriate. Lupo 09:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

there are swathes of text representing the "other" view at the rfc and at the rfar request. It's just that they are hardly readable. But I suggest that The Epopt condescend to sit down and read them regardless, if he fears that my efforts at describing the history of the dispute in a coherent way are calculated to sway him towards my dark agenda. This is not my personal crusade. I just decided to see it through once I had become involved, to save other editors the trouble to wade through it again. If the Fred+Epopt position should turn out to be the view of the arbcom, I will voluntarily lay down my adminship, go on an extended wikibreak, and will indefinitely recuse from mediating in article disputes (but reserve the option to re-apply for adminship at some point in the future if I so choose). dab (ᛏ) 11:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

regarding my alleged expression of "ethnic contempt", it is not made clear which part of my comment is so interpreted. I assume it is the "sh*thole" phrase. I could explain the context of that comment. However, as nobody seems to have noted, the entire comment is private communication on User_talk:Zora and was not addressed at any Hindus only editor directly. If I had thought I was saying something unacceptable on Wikipedia, I would obviously have used email. dab (ᛏ) 11:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 25 addendum

This motion was voted on here: [1]

Fnord, Ashibaka tock 02:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]