Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.46.223.193 (talk) at 21:05, 23 May 2011 (→http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bash_%28band%29: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Midnight on the Mavi Marmara

It is a book edited by Moustafa Bayoumi, as his other works this book should has a Wikipedia page. The book is contributed more than a dozen of writers or thinkers, and it is an important source of a very critical event. -Mary Beth Connor (talk) 08:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has not been deleted: if you disagree with deletion, you can simply remove the PROD and PROD2 templates from the article. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion unless references are added to show that it meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiroko Yakushimaru.jpg

this is not my image, needed for article, I will fix the licensing, thank you! -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not having seen the image, I can't yet hazard a guess. If it's a promo shot, it's out, if it's self-taken, I can do something with it.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Claims to be a cover from Tokyo Samurai Magazine. The picture was a very fuzzy image of a woman's face looking slightly to the right. Mouth slightly open with top teeth visible. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Shaikh, again

Editor said that I created the same page that was deleted before. This is not true. I had nothing to do with the page that was created before. Assume good faith!!! -Mindingthequill (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is a Islamic preacher/ teacher who has references not a suitable topic? There are plenty of others with the same credentials who are on Wikipedia. Why are you subjective in your decision making instead of following Wikipedia's policies? What policies are you going by? And if there is such a policy then I want everyone else off that is breaking this policy ASAP. Thank you kindly! What is fair for one, is fair for all!

Page was said that it could be recreated with proper grammar, which I provided. Then it was deleted anyway. See the following Wikipedia discussion from editors and administrators. Please restore page. I do have a few minor changes to make. :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh (2nd nomination) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Is someone can find better sources then feel free to recreate this. Will userfy/incubate upon request. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC) [edit] Muhammad Shaikh AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh Articles for deletion/Muhammad Shaikh (2nd nomination)

Muhammad Shaikh (edit -Mindingthequill (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. As it says at the top of this page, it is not for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions. It is not that you created the same article, but you created an article about the same person, and there have now been no less than four deletion debates on articles about him:
All of those concluded that he did not meet Wikipedia's notability requirement, which requires showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. As you were told further up this page, if you want to take this further, you will have to go to WP:Deletion review. You will not succeed there unless you can show more independent references. If you can do that, ask user Ron Ritzman (talk), who closed the last deletion debate and offered to userfy if better references were available, whether he is willing to restore your article into a user sub-page for you to improve before taking it to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Both versions of the name have been redirected to the article International Islamic Propagation Center about his Institute. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:StellaTruncRhombicTriaconta.png

I added the Copyright that I used Great Stella. -KirbyRider (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Plumbe

reasoning -SimonPlumbe (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure of the reason behind the deletion of the page but it appears from the brief description that there may be a concern regarding clarification regarding a match between the identity of the convention organiser and freelance writer referred to in the article. As the said person mentioned in the article, I can provide evidence to support this, and links to bodies of work online (and interviews with myself or features referring to both aspects of my work) that will substantiate information in the article that had been deleted.

I believe that the article was created originally by someone familiar with both aspects of my work when there was a crossover period in my earlier days in science fiction fandom and working in the computer industry.

I can be reached on -redacted- should more information be required.

Simon Plumbe, Freelance Writer / Convention Organiser

User:Stltigga

My page was an original information work meant to inform the world of a composer. I was told that the page was ok on May 14 and on May 15 my page was deleted. I would like for my page to be reinstated so I can see what else was 'wrong' about my page, and a reason for a valid reason for its deletion.

After speaking with someone in the help section I was told that it was because it was advertising, Mr. Williams but in what way? Please this process is becoming very insulting and from where I am sitting counterproductive to why people should submit articles to this site.

Thank you -Stltigga (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been userfied to User:Stltigga/Julius Penson Williams. Some advice added on user's talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PaceButler Corporation

I believe PaceButler Corporation Wikipedia page should be undeleted because it is a legitimate company that has been in business for almost 25 years with a good track record. They are a notable business and should be recognized through avenues such as wikipedia. Any questionable links, submissions, etc. will be immediately changed and/or deleted. There is no intent to promote or advertise PaceButler Corporation through Wikipedia. I would like to state what the company does, length of service with references to support the company on your site. Any submission that was considered advertising or promotion was not intended in that matter and again, will be deleted or changed. Thank you for your consideration. -ChameleonMarket (talk) 15:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Looks like you've had a couple of tries at it, and the article still reads like an advertisement. I'd suggestion you read WP:FIRST, then try a version at WP:Article Incubator. When you think you've got it right, ask for constructive feedback there before making a request at WP:RFPP to have the new version moved over. HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should be noted that "Chameleon Marketing" is a PR company working via social media; the account is a spam/role account and is being blocked.Orange Mike | Talk 18:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CFY musical.jpg

okay, let's try this one. Again not my image, needed for article, I will fix rationale, thanks -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Please check if it's okay. :) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteen ice-hockey players

A string of requests from Dolovis (talk) with the complaint, in each case, that "This referenced article was improperly deleted after a BLPPROD was removed by a 3rd party."

 Not done. I have replaced these with this single entry to save space, because this page is not the place for contested speedy deletions like these. As you have already approached Resolute (talk), the deleting admin, without success, you should take these to WP:Deletion review. I suggest a single combined entry there. JohnCD (talk) 11:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shusaku number

Originally deleted because notability was only established through an allegedly dubious source. I would have objected to the prod if I'd found out about it earlier! Certainly the page needs improvement. However, the assertion made in the prod (see User_talk:Aditsu) is incorrect: there does exist a Wikipedia article for the source Sensei's Library. The page may well end up being deleted, but I think it's worth discussion, and I hope the mention at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Go will gather some constructive attention. -Jowa fan (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user DreamGuy (talk), who proposed it. JohnCD (talk) 13:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Engineering Expo

reasoning -Shibani.gharat (talk) 10:29, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. You posted the article again as Engineering expo and it is the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering expo - that is where you should give your reasons for keeping the article. JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

World Ju-Jitsu Federation

reasoning -86.152.184.51 (talk) 14:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Ju-Jitsu Federation, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National Inflation Association

The topic "National Inflation Association" has been totally blanked out and the Discussion and View History are not on the page. I would like to view this old material, as well as possibly edit it. Thanks -Alexethan31 (talk) 18:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done - there was no talk page, no discussion. The "article" consisted of the group's name, that it is "an organization devoted to preparing Americans against hyperinflation", a weblink to a press release about Ron Paul, and a statement that it issues press releases and "produces propaganda videos." If the organization is actually notable, you will need to create a new, more substantial article, with some evidence of actual notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Strategy of the Dolphin

Strategy of the Dolphin: Scoring a Win in a Chaotic World (Morrow, hardcover; Fawcett Columbine, paper) is not an obscure work. The book was a Literary Guild alternate selection, has been published in three German and two United Kingdom editions and in French, Portuguese, Spanish, Greek, Hungarian and Turkish. The German edition of Strategy of the Dolphin (Paidia Verlag) ranked No. 5 on the German business book bestseller list and No. 1 on the self-growth book bestseller list and has just been issued in its third printing. In France, Strategy rose to No. 3 on business-book bestseller lists and recently had its second printing. The book has hundreds of favorable citations on google.com. One of the most recent is this one on NewsnetScotland: http://www.newsnetscotland.com/economy/2424-what-do-we-do-about-the-sharks.html} For other highly positive references to the work, see these Wikipedia entries: Strategic management, Whole brain literacy, Marketing warfare strategies and Clare W. Graves. Also see these links for comments on the efficacy of the dolphin strategy model: http://www.brainmeup.com/blog/2006/05/struggling-with-the-sharks/ and http://www.brainmeup.com/blog/2005/10/nurses-and-dolphin-strategy/ } -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mind quester (talk • contribs) 23:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Strategy of the Dolphin so, as stated at the head of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you think the debate was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user BigDom (talk), the administrator who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark Noyce confused poker player.jpg

OTRS permission confirmed; ticket 2011050810004639. -– Adrignola talk 00:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Young and Beautiful (song)

notable -Colonel Warden (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Eltaibzh/Giad

Giad industrial group is considered the biggest industrial complex in Sudan. It produces almost everything people need, from wheat floor to tractor and buses. It also employees thousands of people. I would like to have to article restored to me user space so I can improve it. Thank you. -Eltaibzh (talk) 13:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The page in your userspace was a copyright violation, being material copied from the company's website at www.giad.com. Wikipedia cannot host copyright information, even in userspace, unless a formal copyright release has been made. In any case material taken from a website is likely to be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, being too promotional and/or too detailed, and lacking the independent references need to show notability. You would do best to write an article in your own words, with references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

levi stephen

levi stephen did in fact play professionaly for Glasgow Rangers and Clydebank football club, but he played under the name Levi Smith, he signed for Rangers in May 1990 and stayed there for three seasons, he then went on to play for Clydebank in the old First Division.

Here are some links as evidence,

http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/clydebank/clydebank.htm

http://www.rangersfchistory.co.uk/players/playerss.php

http://www.rangerspedia.org/index.php/Smith,_Levi

http://www.carlowayfc.co.uk/modules/page/Page.aspx?pc=12&mid=30468&pmid=0

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/cup-that-cheers-falls-a-little-flat-for-minnows-rowley-earns-the-praise-as-buckie-march-on-1.205071

-94.173.6.122 (talk) 17:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please update it with these references. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Kaye (Leonard K. Collins)

Leonard Kaye (Leonard K. Collins) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bettybaiu (talk • contribs) 23:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. As explained on your talk page, the article was deleted because it was a copyright violation, copied from http://leonardkaye.webs.com/. Wikipedia cannot host copyright material - see Wikipedia:Copy-paste - unless a formal copyright release has been made. I have deleted from above here the same material which you copied again. Material copied from a website is in any case likely to be too promotional for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view and references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. You would do best to write an article in your own words, but first read WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jesper Jensen (ice hockey b. 1991)

Please restore the edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 00:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Baker

reasoning -andycjp (talk) 04:35, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are we allowed to know nothing about the woman?

I suggest that you bring this article to the attention of Wikipedia:Deletion review as it would be reasonable to argue that the AfD should have been closed with "No Consensus". Dolovis (talk) 05:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vera Baker so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be restored here. If you believe that the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should first approach user Shimeru (talk), the administrator who closed it; then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HyperCITY Retail (India) Ltd

Article was deleted from userspace draft under (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace). Live page was deleted when it was under revision as spam. There was no intention of spam or advertising. (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion).The talk page where I mentioned that I was trying to revise the article was also deleted under(G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page: the associated page was deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous advertising / promotion.) Like the page to be restored and so that it can be re-written -OnlinePR2011 (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The last version wouldn't be a good start for an article and shouldn't be restored for copy right concerns, the other was point ing at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HyperCITY Retail (India) Ltd which I've now deleted as blanked by author. If after reviewing our conflict of interest guideline, you want to work further on this topic you should start fro scratch using only one account.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

India as a rising superpower

reasoning - Neilpine (talk) 07:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC) This artical made by me was recently proposed for delation by users User:MrGRA and User:Swedish_pirate and has been deleted. The reason given that the format was messy and had nationalistic characteristics. I do beleive this was not well formated but it is not reason to be set for deletion again and again. I believe that the given in time any article can be well put to the regular standards by other contributing users. I do not however believe that anywhere in the article there were any nationalistic issues that were brought up in the discussion page. I also believe that page in detail stands on its own from the page Potential Superpowers. I would also like to make an argument that the users proposing and in favor of the page getting deleted were all european and micht have some antisemitism towards Indians. I would like the admin to consider to undelete the page.[reply]

 Not done. This article was redirected to the "India" section of Potential superpowers after being deleted at a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India as a rising superpower, following earlier deletion with other articles after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China as an emerging superpower (fourth nomination). As stated at the head of this page, articles deleted after a deletion discussion cannot be restored here: you should first approach user KillerChihuahua (talk), the admin who closed the discussion and then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. Please read WP:NPA and do not attack other editors' possible motivations: the only question is whether the article meets Wikipedia's standards and requirements. JohnCD (talk) 12:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#India_as_a_rising_power_-_AGAIN.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:22, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khadija_Zeynalova

the page was deleted due to there was no source mentioned, I've got a source to mention now. could we please restore the page? -79.197.174.253 (talk) 12:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sicadis

The information contained in this article was taken straight from the band's website and displays a neutral outlook on the band by only containing the achievements and history of the band. I can provide links to verify any debatable content. -Sicadis (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Group

This article was deleted two months ago via an expired PROD tag ("The article is not notable, no in-line references"). The thing is the Seven Group, or "Big Seven", was a major criminal organization during Prohibition and a precursor to the National Crime Syndicate. And there isn't much point in adding in-line citations when there's only one reference listed [1]. -72.74.221.5 (talk) 22:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The book is available here though there's plenty of sources available online. [2] [3] [4] 72.74.225.43 (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Between the nomination by a blocked sock and a first reference present, I don't really see a reason not to restore it as contested prod. No prejudice against merging or bringing this to AfD. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard McNamara

Article was delted under (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). The person invovled is a significant player in the 2009/2010 downfall of the domestic Irish banking sector, being a debtor of c. EUR1.5bn of the main Irish banks. -194.69.198.227 (talk) 11:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D.U.D.A.

reasoning He is a notable rapper and musician who is famous amongst Albanians all over the world and has had success with selling his music to Albanian speaking people. D.U.D.A. has also appeared on MTV in Germany and Scandanavia -Oltianruci (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greylingstad

i could not paste new article over previous version -Ecbotha (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I FOUND THIS ARTICLE ON GREYLINGSTAD THAT SEEMS TO BE MUCH MORE ACCURATE THAN MY ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION, I TRIED TO PASTE IT IN DURING EDIT, BUT I COULD NOT DO IT. CAN YOU PERHAPS DO IT FOR ME? THE LINK TO THE ARTICLE, WHICH CONTAINS IN PART SOME OF MY PERSONAL WRITING, IS: http://boksburghistorical.com/index_files/BHAjulaug2010.pdf

MANY THANKS

ETTIENNE BOTHA <Copied and pasted text removed>

Not done You tried something that neither worked nor would be the appropriate way to improve the article. So I had to revert your edit and also removed the text here. As you probably noticed, your previous addition had been removed as well. The article of yours may or may not be a good source for some info but it shouldn't be simply pasted as it is something different than what we're trying to do here. That being said I hope you find a way to share with us what you know about Greylingstad.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

charlton-king-vandam historic district

This is a landmarked New York City neighborhood which had an entirely accurate description. For some reason this was deleted. No idea why. Please revert. Thank you! -67.250.34.197 (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see revisions under the name you gave nor the one I'd expect. Can you check the title? looking at the other redlinks in List of New York City Designated Landmarks in Manhattan below 14th Street, I see some haven't yet been created, others deleted because created by a banned user. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SoldierKnowsBest

It is now a show on the revision3 network, the previous article was deleted as there was not enough third party information at the time -86.40.234.250 (talk) 19:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoldierKnowsBest, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

omniscient technology

No where does this page actually advertise anything as claimed by the people who deleted the page. It is menat as an informational page about the term omniscient technology. -71.202.105.17 (talk) 20:30, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This was deleted as a result of this deletion discussion so it can't be restored here. You'll have to discuss this with Cirt. However, he's usually pretty good about restoring and reopening the AFDs for "1 voters". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, only able to userfy for registered users, not request of an IP, unfortunately. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, back at AFD. Relisted. -- Cirt (talk) 04:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worcester County Mathematics League

WP:NOTPAPER; league is more notable than others that remain (with stub-quality articles) -Rjyanco (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request

Can the following deleted articles be placed in my userspace please?

Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nelson Mariano II

Because it's our own picture that we tagged in my account in Facebook -CKwarrior (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eldar Gasanov.JPG

because i'am the one who took a picture of it and upload it on Facebook then make it a picture of the Subject -CKwarrior (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well face book says uploader was "E Lo Isurina Mariano" If this user can place a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license text aginst the iamge we can believe the claim. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Macula Risk

OTRS permission received for material in ticket 2011051810012889. -– Adrignola talk 17:31, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Restored and sent to AfD by deleting administrator. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:15, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Panama-Pacific_Half_Dollar

reasoning -Realberserker (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these commemorative half dollars is individually notable, and as many of them sell for >$1,000, they have significant interest in the collecting community.

I replied on the talk page of the admin who originally deleted this. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Chris Sacedor

Because I am in the right place and the page that I created is true, confirmed, and a good resource of the certain subject of the page. -Bianca Anne Martins (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. You may want to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Paul Christopher Sacedor. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dodo Newman

i can ensure many public sources for this person -Zsoltszemerszky (talk) 10:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add them to User:Zsoltszemerszky/Dodo Newman which Cirt has already restored for you with suggestions how to go about it at your talk page. They are abbreviations but each of the blue links will bring you to a useful page. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Shipwrecks

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

reasoning -174.62.226.216 (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This band was one of last to play in the old punk clubs of New York. They had a following that came from all 5 boroughs and are the authors of the song 'I Want to Join the Irish Mob,' which was covered by several NYC bands. Their album, Inchcape Rock, has a decade of radio, internet and public play and sells substantially on iTunes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bash_%28band%29

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

reasoning -24.46.223.193 (talk) 21:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Page was unnecessarily deleted. Subject is a well-known artist who happened to just release a new piece of work a mere days ago. Notoriety and significance are very strong.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=430572954"