Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 92.236.221.139 (talk) at 19:41, 6 January 2012 (→PO SUM ON). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Scroogle

After two years, I feel that Scroogle users and contributors have markedly increased (350.000 searches everyday), and I personally know many people from different surroundings who use it daily. I'm concerned that that page was deleted, first because was useful, second because it has an Alexa rank higher than MediaWiki. I believe we have to give it another chance. --Ogoorcs (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and I'm a big fan of the hip-hop/rapper known as Snik 'Liw B  :-P (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie benson

Stephanie Benson was under the name of " The princess" song was "Now is the time" under public demand, PWL. www.discogs.com/sell/list?release_I'd=1638576&ev=mrb

Please check out all the information of websites and research adequately.

Re . Natural mystic. www.jazz services.org.uk/index-php?option=com_directory&task=band&ITemid= 9&id=18365

Re: Hanging on www.media fire.com/?lv2zbtsyc7haj8r

Re: Bruce Elliot Smith. www.song link.com/song link-cd-summer-20016-html

Re title: news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/England/Kent/4293399.stm

www.bbc.co/uk/radio4/home truths/0336ghanaian_princess.shtml

www.urban world.co.uk/events/id/1455/date/06-08-2005 - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dom11098 (talk • contribs)

Isrg Rajan

kindly verify the page details before making any changes or deleting -120.59.55.28 (talk) 15:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Esquina3.jpg

I wish to use this to illustrate an album cover on La Esquina del Infinito, I can add the necessary licensing and fair use templates, thank you. Mattg82 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) -Mattg82 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done but please the necessary fair use rationale as soon as possible to avoid deletion. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

G1 Jockey 3

When I went to create the article I saw that stubs had been speedied years ago for notability concerns. There is now no reason to keep these versions out of the history, and I would like to see whatever attempts were made at this article before (however unsuccessful). -▫ JohnnyMrNinja 22:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Living the Questions

Not sure who put the deletion process in motion and have been unsuccessful in tracking that person down in the "articles for deletion" process archives. I believe the deletion of the article was unjustified. I only discovered the article was deleted when I went to add multiple attestations in recently published books that clearly support an already established notability of the subject. As I am only an occasional Wikipedian, any help or suggestions would be welcomed! Thank you. -Higgledeepiggledee (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The deletion was proposed by Lionelt, mostly on the grounds that the only "sources" were self-published; and was unchallenged by anybody else. You should provide those impartial third-party sources as soon as possible, as the notability had clearly not been as clearly established as you believed. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GunWordUp.jpg

The image in question was deleted automatically by a bot after it had been orphaned due to unnoticed vandalism on the page on which it appeared. The image was deleted before I (the uploader) could correct the vandalism. -DVD Smith (talk) 21:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done January (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yaadein (Short film 2012)

this article is not a joke , nor it contain any fake information,i joined Wikipedia just to make this article so that i can make people aware of my this film and about my small production company, though i didn't understand the reason why you people deleted it plus its very much difficult to understand Wikipedia's system, i humbly request from you to please undeletion it kindly sir. -Alvey420 (talk) 23:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

F-Li

The article was just deleted without any notice. I was only given after the article was deleted. -Taylorswiftverifiedfan (talk) 06:16, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flint Dale

An administrator told me that the article was considered to be notable, though there are some issues. Days after an administrator deleted my article because of a blatant hoax. But why? They didn't even give me any further notice that they will delete the article. They didn't even give me any news that the article was already deleted. -Sojdfsdf (talk) 06:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: Could you point me to where you were told the subject was notable by anyone? I'm unable to see any type of notability at all for the subject. The subject does not appear to meet the fairly strict requirements on English Wikipedia, and I can see that the same article was spammed (and deleted) across many other independent language Wikipedias (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broken and Shared

The article was deleted because it did not originally meet the book legitimacy criteria on Wikipedia. However, I did edit the article so that it met the criteria, but I forgot to remove the deletion proposal banner. I would like to continue working on this article. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyrivard08 (talk • contribs)

Raymond Walter Copp

reasoning -Revpilot (talk) 22:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing information about myself.

File:One Day At A Time title screen.jpg

This file was deleted from One Day at a Time under grounds that the non-free image consisted of a copyright-ineligible logo. However, per WP:non-free content review#File:I Love Lucy Titlecard.png, there is a debate between replacing and keeping on the basis of (ir)replaecability of non-free title cards. There must be a recovery of this image if kept alive in admin data. Then when time goes by, this may be put under review. -George Ho (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not clear what you're asking. What do your last two sentences mean? Nyttend (talk) 04:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll rephrase. I hope you save this file in your archives. If you undelete this file, then I may someday have this file reviewed in WP:NFCR. --George Ho (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=File:Missouri-573-3-400.png&action=edit&redlink=1

Hi. I created this image from publicly available information that was free of copyright (the image was created by the government of the state of Missouri). I overlayed the image with hand-drawn boundary lines to create a derivative work. If I recall correctly, I placed the derived image in the public domain after I created it (although I can't seem to view that meta-data since the image was deleted). If it's necessary, I also hereby license the image under the Creative Commons license. -Diabolical_Mdog (talk) 02:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done Works by US state governments (except for Minnesota and Florida) are copyrighted and not released freely, so derivative works cannot be freely licensed. Of course, a unique image owned by a US state can fall under fair use claims, but a simple state map is definitely replaceable. Please go to http://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/general_ref/cousub_outline/cen2k_pgsz/mo_cosub.pdf and take a screenshot of the county-level map on the first page: this is a public domain work of the US Government and should serve your purposes just as well as the nonfree state-owned map. Since it's not burdened with a sharealike clause, you may release your derivative work into the public domain, or you may use any of the Attribution or Attribution-Sharealike Creative Commons licenses. Nyttend (talk) 04:38, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Dyer

I am presently editing fr:Michel Germaneau and I need information about Edwin Dyer (in particular when he died) and reliable sources about Edwin Dyer, and could not find any in the English language Wikipedia. It seems to me that the decision to remove the article entirely without merging into the article redirected to was not appropriate, especially as this was a second deletion request following a first one which was inconclusive. Please merge. -Teofilo talk 14:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Dyer (second nomination) does not seem to prohibit merging. You are welcome to merge any of the content (the page's previous content is located here). Best regards mate, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have done it, adding {{Copied }} on both talk pages. I did not realise I could do this without asking here. Thanks for your help. Teofilo talk 17:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Anthony (evangelist)

Tony Anthony is a well-known evangelist and author and his Wikipedia page had a removal request from people attempting to harm his story. We are seeking undeletion because there are a number of sources to verify the claims of Tony Anthony and we wish to have those stated on his Wikipedia page. -72.145.180.19 (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs) to take a look. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even though we received a BLP complaint about the deletion statement, the article was simply PRODded. I've restored it and notified the contributors who nominated it for deletion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Murugappa Group

Murugappa Group is one of India's leading business conglomerates. Market leaders in diverse areas of business including Engineering, Abrasives, Finance, General Insurance, Cycles, Sugar, Farm Inputs, Fertilizers, Plantations, Bio-products and Nutraceuticals, its 28 businesses have manufacturing facilities spread across 13 states in India. The organization fosters an environment of professionalism and has a workforce of over 32,000 employees. -Ramesh Ramaiah talk 19:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - the page is now restored to its last copyright infringement-free version. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :-) Ramesh Ramaiah talk 13:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

file:ANCAFE-single11.jpg

For use on "Snow Scene" a song by Antic Cafe. I can add the licensing and fair use templates. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - the rationale is ready to be added. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

file:ANCAFE-single3.jpg

For use on Cosmos (An Cafe single). I can add the licensing and fair use templates if required. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - just update the file page as needed, and make sure to add the image to the article. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

file:Shikisai momento1.jpg

Album cover for Shikisai Moment, I can add the required fair use rationale. -Mattg82 (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - just make sure to add licensing, as usual :) Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) Mattg82 (talk) 00:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plazma Burst 2

This page was a Work In Progress, and it could have added to Wikipedia, but someone apparently has to cry foul, and doesn't like entertainment games. I request that the page is Un-deleted so that I can resume my work. Now remember, look for WIP before you delete something. -X d 000 (talk) 23:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:X d 000/Plazma Burst 2. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Alexf (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ANCAFE-single6.jpg

To use as single cover for Escapism (song), cheers. -Mattg82 (talk) 01:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this one please to use on Merrymaking (Dekobako na Mainichi to, Ai Kawarazu na Bokura). Mattg82 (talk) 02:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And yet another one to use on Bonds ~Kizuna~. Mattg82 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ×3 - cheers mate, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Somtum_(film)

Deleted because unnotable film with no sources or reviews. It's now on IMDB, and other film sites, including reviews. -Ookami.bg (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nelson Denis.jpg

Copyright permission was sent to OTRS on November 17, 2011 and again on Nobember 18, 2011. -Nelsondenis248 (talk) 07:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - restored, thanks! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:48, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This has twice been deleted after lengthy and extremely protracted PUF discussions, and should be discussed at Deletion Review, since it is obviously not uncontroversial. See my note to Arbitrarily0's talk page.[1] ScottyBerg (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Criminal Ra.one.jpg

I had given a source, licensing information, Portion used, and every thing needed, just after a few hours of speedy deletion tagging.Yet, a admin deleted it under WP:CSD#F4.Please help restore this image, as it also links to a Start Class article: Criminal (Ra.One song) -Dipankan In the woods? 10:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - yes I think it may have been deleted by accident. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is it replaceable or not? That parameter is still missing. →Στc. 23:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clorets.jpg

not my image, needed for article, I will fix -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - please just add the appropriate information to the file page. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:RodolphFaneDeSalisbyGSWatson.jpg

Why was this image deleted? The artist died more than 70 years ago.Rodolph (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - please contact Fastily (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page. Then you may seek deletion review. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Breedlove

Ben Breedlove is a teen who has and will continue to change peoples lives with the short youtube videos he has created. Ben inspired thousands if not millions and has become a household name known in the public as well as by A-list celebrities. Ben deserves to have his legacy shown and preserved on wikipedia so he can continue to touch people's lives. -192.54.242.165 (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this page has not yet been deleted, and is merely under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Breedlove. Please consider leaving your comments there. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Ireton

stillapublicfigure The deletion reason was "WP:PROD -69.33.251.2 (talk) 20:47, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif University of Technology Association

The deletion reason was "WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection". Please userify to my userspace so I can work on the article. Thanks. -Hamrolly (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Hamrolly/Sharif University of Technology Association. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Brew (US Band)

opportunity to improve, justify entry -Planet118 (talk) 21:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Planet118/The Brew (U.S. Band). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please consider contacting UtherSRG (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xiaomi Tech

please help me to restore the page to my userspace so i can merge info in the version which being speedy deleted to the current version -C933103 (talk) 21:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AndrewLaszlo-PortraitJon.jpg

I have permission from the copyright holder to use this image on Wikipedia. Is there a way for me to post this without having to go back to the copyright holder to do the release himself? I am happy to consider any other tag that you feel would be acceptable. -Glaszlo (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. Only the copyright holder can license their work; not anybody else. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ucirvine-seal.png

Not looking for undeletion. Just wanted to know the users on the edit history for purposes of collaboration on an article that used this file. Thanks! ---Policy Reformer(c) 01:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More specifically, I'm hoping for an editor without a WP:COI issue to help me since I have a COI issue.--Policy Reformer(c) 01:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Significant editors were Kzollman (talk · contribs) (uploader), Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs), and Amerique (talk · contribs). Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk)

YoungDoctorsImageTwo.jpg

reasoning -YOUNGDOCTORS (talk) 06:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This account has been blocked as a spamusername account advertising an upcoming Australian television reality show. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Långaryd family

It is NOT hoax. The family's is in Guinness Book of World Records in two places so it is wrong to say that the family is just a invention. One can argue whether it is correct to call it a family by definition, but the concept is a reality. There are many proud members of the family around the world. Please undelete it so that I can improve. See http://langarydsslakten.se/english.htm -Magol (talk) 08:28, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hermann Leopoldi

I was just about to start an article on this celebrated composer (celebrated in Germany/Austria but also USA in past years) when I found this:- 

   05:23, 5 June 2007 Kusma (talk | contribs) deleted "Hermann Leopoldi" ‎ (g5)

I am not Wikiskilled enough to find the "deleting administrator" as requested by the template - but have reached this page, hence my request. It may be that the original article was awful (I have no access to it) but the subject is certainly notable and deserves inclusion (cf eg His entry on German Wikipedia and An online biographical summary drawn from respectable sources in both English and German) Testbed (talk) 08:35, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article was deleted back in 2007 by Kusma (talk · contribs), an admin who's now only editing sporadically. However, the article was deleted in accordance with speedy deletion criterion G5, i.e. by a blocked or banned user while evading his block or ban; furthermore, the article is very short... You can create a new article about Leopoldi, if you wish! You can use the Article wizard. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:01, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good news - I'll start now. Many thanks. Testbed (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hornblower (TV series)

reasoning -74.14.48.229 (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC) Two sections on the Hornblower (TV series) page concerning the future productions went missing on January 3rd-or-4th. Have they been deleted or moved to another location? Can they be restored?[reply]

I believe you may be referring to these sections, which were removed by another user. Please note that this noticeboards only deals with articles which were deleted and not with content disputes, such as the one here. If you wish, you can raise the matter on the article's talk page, but please first familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's rules regarding original research and verifiability. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zagg

Owner of IFrogz, developer of InvisibleSHIELD[2], cited in TheStreet.com[3], abc4.com[4]. --- Trevj (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 07:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Faye Wong discography

Article was deleted under WP:CSD#G7 "one author requests deletion" but this page is a longstanding collaboration between many authors, and is clearly still required as a discography of a major Asian musician. -– Fayenatic (talk) 13:59, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:25, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:OtherSideOfImmigrationCover.jpeg

reasoning file taken from http://www.theothersideofimmigration.com/PRESSKIT.html with Full permission granted to anyone wishing to use pictures and text on this page for articles, promotions, brochures, or programs. -Othersideofimmigration (talk) 15:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were unblocked so that you could request a change of username, not so that you could continue to promote your film!!!! --Orange Mike | Talk 15:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

El Pomar Foundation

a)- I did not know there was a prod so unable to contest. b)- Reasons for deletion were "Expired PROD, concern was: small local charity, does not appear to fulfil WP:ORG". c)- Reasons to keep: The article concerns an area of significant interest to the entire state of Colorado both current and historically. The foundation was formed in 1937 and has supported many cultural and civic institutions throughout Colorado. With close to 500 million dollars ($471,530,109.00; 2010 Form 990-PF) in assets and annual grant disbursements close to 20 million dollars ($18,778,434; 2010 Form 990-PF) the "charity" is not exactly small or local.

The El Pomar foundation administers the "El Pomar Carriage Museum", the Will Rogers Shrine of the Sun, and the "Penrose House" which is used by local, state, national, and international organizations.

The foundation also administers:

  • Anna Keesling Ackerman Fund; providing local grants to nonprofit organizations.
  • The Hambrick Fund; provides grants to nonprofit organizations throughout Colorado for the "prevention of cruelty to animals, educational programs for the proper care of and attention to animals, and research grants and assistance in these regards".
  • Karl E. Eitel Fund; funds various Colorado state "youth at risk" programs.
I believe the deleted article may be able to be enhanced (or the alternative rewritten) to provide encyclopedic content with current and historical significance. In the future I plan to create an article on co-founder "Julie Penrose" and it will include a section on the foundation.
  • Supports
    Central City Opera
    Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center.
    Regional Partnership Program: 9 regional councils that give advice to the trustees. The program provided 1.6 million in grants in 2011.
    Wildland Fire Fund; has provided over 2.7 million in statewide grants to 170 volunteer fire departments.
    Colorado state Boys and Girls clubs.
  • Coverage satisfies WP:ORG: There is extensive coverage including: News articles; www.gazette.com- many multiple times, www.chieftain.com, www.bcdemocratonline.com, www.alamosanews.com, www.vaildaily.com, www.canoncitydailyrecord.com, www.lajuntatribunedemocrat.com ). TV coverage (www.kjct8.com/news). Radio; www.kunc.org.(91.5). Ethnic organizations; (www.hispania-news.com (Hispanic), www.nationaljewish.org (Jewish), www.coloradospringsindiancenter.com (Indian). Other organizations; www.foundationcenter.org (Philanthropy news Digest), www.aims.edu (Aims Community College), www.bizjournals.com (Denver Business Journal), www.spacefoundation.org.
There are many more not listed to satisfy ORG. -Otr500 (talk) 16:14, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dot-Rotten.jpg

I uploaded the image without first checking the copyright agreement. I have removed its link to the Dot Rotten article and it is now a solitary article/image waiting for deletion. -AlligatorSky (talk) 17:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SkyTemplate

This template is used for a tool on the Toolserver. The URL of the Tool is

http://toolserver.org/~geohack/skyhack.php

This tool is linked on more than 2000 (!) Pages in the german WP. The script has been moved before. maybe, important informations to prevent deleting have been lost at that time. Antonsusi (talk) 18:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think, that "two weeks ago" is a well argument for "Not done" (without a view on my arguments) , when that weeks are at the end of a year (over christmas, where users are in holyday or so). The deletion request was simply not seen from me or other user of the german WP. Also, therefore there has not been a really discussion, only a request and a decide later. The damaging of a tool is a well argument for undeleting. You and any other admin here can see easyly even more than two weeks later, that this deletion was an error. Antonsusi (talk) 20:17, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The template was deleted based on a discussion where no one other than the nominator participated, on the (apparently mistaken) assertion that it is unused. In my opinion, it should simply be restored as useful to some and harmless to all. That being said, since it's used by 'all projects', wouldn't it make more sense to be placed at meta? –xenotalk 20:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That needs an adjust of the PHP-script on the toolserver and I've no access to the script. The last user, that has made an edit (when I remember well), was User:Kolossos. I can ask him, but as first step the template shoudt be undeleted to make the tool as quickly as possible usable. The next step is an adjusting of the script to use annother template page. Antonsusi (talk) 22:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I've provisionally restored this template, as it is being actively used for the betterment of Wikimedia projects. I still think it should be migrated over to meta, but for now it should not be deleted. –xenotalk 14:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I wish it weren't the case, but bureaucracy is big enough here that I fear that people will object that Xeno's comment above makes him/her involved. For that reason, I redeleted the template and immediately restored it, since I've never done anything with it before nor even mentioned it in my writing. Better to obviate possible complaints than to have to face them after they're made. Nyttend (talk) 03:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmilymarilynKevinBreak.JPG

An email archived as ticket # 2011111410022819 in the permissions queue confirms permission from the owner of KevinBreak.com under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). -MorganKevinJ(talk) 22:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please add the OTRS permission received template yourself, since I can't remember what exactly to type. Nyttend (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grepolis

I strongly believe that page should not be deleted. In my opinion the A7 is not applicable for this case, since the mentioned article is as important (or unimportant) as the Travian, Freeciv.net, Evony or any other game from the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games. With the logic every article from List_of_multiplayer_browser_games should be given A7 and deleted.

Additionally it appears that the article has been created and deleted 3 more times in the past, which does not make sense. -LevanJugheli (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a comment — two of the three earlier deletions were G7 (author-requested deletion), so only the first deletion (also an A7) is really debateable. Nyttend (talk) 02:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZAGG Logo.png

Used in (recently undeleted) article ZAGG Inc. --- Trevj (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stina Sanders

to edit -Stinalaurensanders (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This has not been deleted: your submission at WP:Articles for creation was declined, but your draft is still available at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stina Sanders for you to edit and resubmit. Please note, though, that Wikipedia is not a site like Myspace or Facebook for people to write about themselves: you should read Wikipedia:Autobiography, and also WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlante FC logo.svg

I deleted this file from Commons, as it is a logo. It was requested that I comment this here, in case someone wanted to restore the file locally under a non-free criteria. -Cambalachero (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Nyttend (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monetary circuit theory

is a valid article topic -Wbm1058 (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why this article was deleted. The topic is not a hoax (Google it). Several Wikipedia articles link to this article, and they now have red links. The user User:Jmckeon ie who resumed editing on December 24 after over a year hiatus, and proposed deletion on Christmas day retired from Wikipedia on New Years Day?!

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 15:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fenwick & West

Sorry, but could not figure out how to contact admin directly. Admin removed our company's wiki page based on copyright violations, but alleged voilation was descriptive text of our company from our website. We can easily modify descriptive text on Wikipedia to avoid exact duplication of text on our website if that addresses Wikipedia's concern, but entire Fenwick & West wiki page should not have been deleted. -Rkshimako (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gutterbirds

Could I have a copy of the source code restored to my userspace so that I can work on addressing the concerns about the page so its possible for me to move the code to a different Wiki? -Ls883 (talk) 00:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ls883/Gutterbirds. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Bryan Munoz

this article is pure fact and i dont understand that reference stuff just leave as is please -Gamehogger911 (talk) 03:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Nyttend (talk) 03:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It has now been deleted, and will not be restored because Munoz does not meet Wikipedia's notability standard - see WP:NFOOTY for what a footballer needs to have achieved before he can have a WIkipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas of UTR Regulatory Activity

The page was originally deleted because there was "No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability". Now ther is a scientific journal (Bioinformatics) peer-reviewed published article that in my opinion qualifies as an independent source. I thus ask you to undelete the page. Thank you very much. -Cibioltg (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clignett

reasoning -Clignett73 (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clignett#Clignett http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arunsingh16 has proposed deletion of de Clignett article. Why can't there be a Clignett article? --Clignett73 (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. If you want this article to be kept, you'll have to argue against its deletion here, but please first read Wikipedia's notability requirements and the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dale S

I was the fourth one to re-create the article. After I was done, it was said that it needed a clean-up and minutes later, they deleted the article and they didn't even give me any further notice. So, I recreated it again. Right after I was done, I refreshed it and an administrator said that I vandalised it and contested it for deletion, but after I was done making my reason of why not to delete the article, it was already deleted. And why was the reason that it was vandalised, Yeah, I may say that I re-created it, but I didn't vandalised. Instead, I was giving more verifiable resources for the article. -Oidsofipsd (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Torbjørn Agdestein

The page was deleted and i want to know why. It was accepted yesterday, but someone deleted it today. -XMaXixX (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done As per the original AFD, the player does not meet the notability requirements under WP:FOOTY, in part because he does not play for a fully-professional team. Just because the article for creation passed general layout, does not mean that the player meets notability requirements yet. Until such time as he meets notability requirements, I have protected the article name from creation. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:34, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asad Wazir

This is the valid information of a singer from Lahore Pakistan who is working with industry since 2005 . -Khurramwazir23 (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DHWANI CET

DHWANI is most popular culfest of engineering collages in kerela which is hosted by College of Engineering, Trivandrum -117.213.51.191 (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaseya

This page was deleted was deleted with no warning. It did not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. Please restore the page with the appropriate flags so the article can be corrected.173.45.194.71 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC) -173.45.194.71 (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PO SUM ON

Please can you re-check PO SUM ON should not have been deleted it is an official medicine that is sold worldwide.

Po Sum On was registered and officially marketed in Hong Kong in 1907. It is a multi-million pound turnover company based in Hong Kong.

Please see offical web page: http://www.posumon.com.hk/ Thanks.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=469955183"