User talk:Titodutta
This is Titodutta's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
Death would not be called bad, O people, if one knew how to truly die.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
You can leave me a message on Sarahah at titodutta |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Wikiproject West Bengal
Is Wikiproject West Bengal dead. If so, can it be revived (I can try to do so if needed). I recently asked for help about the article West Bengal but then realised that most of the requests had been left unanswered. Also I see that except for you most of the other participants are inactive শুভ দোলযাত্রা — FR™ 11:00, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher)I would advise against a revival.Local-area-wiki-projects outside the Euramerica scape almost always remains perpetually inactive and useless for most purposes.~ Winged BladesGodric 14:21, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Winged Blades of Godric-My major concern is the lack of a forum of experienced editors (with deep knowledge of the subject area) to mentor or give feedback on the progress of articles towards the big two (GA, FA) which I know from bitter experience can sometimes be quite misleading. — Frc Rdl 10:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, I am, actually thinking about it, however I do not know how to solve it. If you want I can contact West Bengal Wikimedians and tell them about this issue. Would it help? --Titodutta (talk) 18:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- That would definitely be a start. Please go ahead — Frc Rdl 04:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Adding Username
Hello sir, I always add ~~~~, please help me to fix it. Shrinivas G Kulkarni 16:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- You don't need to add <nowiki>. Just sign with four tildes. Feel free to test below. --Titodutta (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
nationalist editor
Dear user and administrator, I found some editors in your area who persistently erase references I introduced, claiming personal opinions. These actions are visible in the pages:
Vlachs: 20:48, 24 February 2018 Zoupan (talk | contribs) . . (38,282 bytes) (-3,502) . . (rewrite intro and etymology according to subject and reliable sources) (undo)
In this case an article was completly changed by a vandalic intervention of Zoupan editor. An article is good one year and disappeared in a single day (-3,502 characters and references erased). All references are appreciated only from nationalistic point of view. In former Yugoslav countries the Vlach minority is persecuted.
Morlachs v) 19:39, 28 February 2018 Staszek Lem (talk | contribs) . . (33,902 bytes) (-584) . . (Reverted 1 edit by 86.124.160.242 (talk). (TW)) (Tag: Undo) Here 3 references were erased eliminating the mention of Vlachs/Morlachs in a census
this article was blocked by you after Staszek and Zoupan erased several times the references about the existence of a Vlach minority in Croatia. There are references about this minority but they have a nationalistic approach and refuse the references about the Vlachs/Morlachs from Croatia. (especially the census)
Hasanaginica 17:56, 2 March 2018 Staszek Lem (talk | contribs) m . . (8,680 bytes) (-1,965) . . (Reverted edits by 86.124.160.242 (talk) to last version by Staszek Lem) (Tag: Rollback) where the Staszek and even Zoupan erased several times the word Vlachs and some references about Vlachs/Morlachs. Vlachs or Morlachs are mentioned as authors of the Hasanaginica ballad by the person who descovered the ballad, Alberto Fortis. Fortis is a prymary source because he lived and spoked with Vlachs or Morlachs during the time he found this ballad. Vlachs or Morlachs are considered by Fortis as authors of ballad. So the name of Vlachs is better to be in the text, being indicated by a primary source. Other opinions are welcomed but without mitigating the role of a minority like Vlachs.
Please review these articles and try to understand why nationalistic approach of former Yugoslav countries editors fight to mitigate the existence of Vlach/Morlach minority. I hope the ethics of Wikipedia will be applied in the pages you control, avoiding exagerate nationalism and original research.
A copy of this observations will be sent to other administrators in order to avoid nationalistic approaches and "war" against minorities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.124.160.242 (talk) 06:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- It is a content dispute, you can discuss on article talk page, I am also pinging User:Staszek Lem, User:Zoupan here. Let's see. --Titodutta (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- The IP is a hoaxer/POV-warrior that deliberately misinterprets the terms "Vlach" and "Morlach" (exonyms) in historical articles to create a modern minority where there is none.--Zoupan 08:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)--Zoupan 08:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- It looks to me that all these IPs are most likely User:Riadder, who was blocked in February by User:Oshwah per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Riadder. I've replied on my own talk page to the statements by the IP. EdJohnston (talk) 14:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Nice study
Just a note
This page mw:Manual:Parameters to index.php, might be a good reading. --Titodutta (talk) 07:12, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Review request
pls review article Gargi Gupta. Thanks in advance.
Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- Will check in a few hours, --Titodutta (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- I have made changes. --Titodutta (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot.
Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 11:14, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
You have got mail
Looking forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wanderin.yogi (talk • contribs) 10:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
- Please let me know here. Thanks. --Titodutta (talk) 11:03, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your contribution against Vandalism in the articles Kabir (film) and in Sabyasachi Chakrabarty. P.Shiladitya✍talk 02:52, 24 March 2018 (UTC) |
MSW
@RegentsPark: You understand that MSW is merely a troll account right? I've been saying for 2 years that MSW is a troll account.VictoriaGrayson (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)