User contributions for K13060
Results for K13060 talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 315 edits. Account created on 6 May 2006.
19 May 2007
18 February 2007
- 00:5300:53, 18 February 2007 diff hist −3 m Alpidem Fixed tag
- 00:2400:24, 18 February 2007 diff hist −605 Alpidem Drug box created formatting problems-- little info there anyway, so removed for now
- 00:2100:21, 18 February 2007 diff hist +120 m Alpidem Added tags for POV and unverified claims
1 September 2006
- 20:4820:48, 1 September 2006 diff hist +13 2006 United States Senate election in Connecticut Supports "the right to" same-sex marriage is proper wording, as opposed to "supports same-sex marriage." The latter is like saying a pro-choice pol "supports abortion" as opposed to "abortion rights"
30 August 2006
- 21:5121:51, 30 August 2006 diff hist −82 Joe Lieberman Trying to enforce NPOV and grammar cleanups
- 20:1420:14, 30 August 2006 diff hist +34 2006 United States Senate election in Connecticut "Same-sex marriage" is the neutral term rather than "gay marriage"- other minor wording
5 August 2006
- 21:1421:14, 5 August 2006 diff hist +2,422 Talk:Joe Lieberman →Request declined
3 August 2006
- 06:0306:03, 3 August 2006 diff hist +2,481 Talk:Joe Lieberman DLC: This article vs. reality and the DLC article
2 August 2006
- 22:5622:56, 2 August 2006 diff hist +83 m Joe Lieberman No content changes from me, but I did add tags.
- 22:4222:42, 2 August 2006 diff hist +1,742 Talk:Joe Lieberman →The LionO edit wars
- 20:2920:29, 2 August 2006 diff hist −20 m Talk:Joe Lieberman Logged in to sign my comment properly.
4 July 2006
3 July 2006
- 21:5821:58, 3 July 2006 diff hist +18 Democrat in name only You're right about the "edicts" language; but assuming the original editor was factually correct, exec power can still be mentioned
- 21:1821:18, 3 July 2006 diff hist +7,843 Talk:Joe Lieberman →Here is my view of what needs to occur
- 09:1609:16, 3 July 2006 diff hist +2,979 Talk:Joe Lieberman Compromises
- 03:5303:53, 3 July 2006 diff hist +1,055 Talk:Joe Lieberman →Here is my view of what needs to occur
- 00:1200:12, 3 July 2006 diff hist +3,739 Talk:Joe Lieberman My POV, stated rationally
2 July 2006
- 23:0123:01, 2 July 2006 diff hist +242 Talk:Joe Lieberman /→Mediation request
- 22:1322:13, 2 July 2006 diff hist +265 Talk:Joe Lieberman Objections
- 21:2421:24, 2 July 2006 diff hist +31 Joe Lieberman Tags
- 21:0621:06, 2 July 2006 diff hist +119 Talk:Joe Lieberman WP style guide links
- 20:5320:53, 2 July 2006 diff hist +3,892 Talk:Joe Lieberman Whatever
- 19:0419:04, 2 July 2006 diff hist −219 Joe Lieberman Restored consensus version by RobLa
- 09:1009:10, 2 July 2006 diff hist +11 m Joe Lieberman Format fix
- 09:0609:06, 2 July 2006 diff hist −224 Joe Lieberman Maybe a compromise that we can both deal with
- 08:3108:31, 2 July 2006 diff hist +362 Talk:Joe Lieberman →compromises: /
- 08:2708:27, 2 July 2006 diff hist +35 Joe Lieberman How about not telling people what to think about who sees him as a DINO?
- 08:2008:20, 2 July 2006 diff hist +1,068 Talk:Joe Lieberman →compromises: /
- 08:0808:08, 2 July 2006 diff hist +2,000 N Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-02 POV on Joe Lieberman page Request
- 07:3507:35, 2 July 2006 diff hist +146 Joe Lieberman Look, the opening is completely accurate. The fact is, if you read the Courant article, you cannot use voting record without qualifications.
- 07:3007:30, 2 July 2006 diff hist −279 Joe Lieberman I have O'Reilly in an interview saying how much he loves Lieberman...going to take that out?
- 07:1807:18, 2 July 2006 diff hist +61 Joe Lieberman If you want to mention that Bill Clinton was DLC, that's fair...but to remove ideological characterization is not
- 07:1507:15, 2 July 2006 diff hist +728 Joe Lieberman The intro as you changed it, is simply not fair. Any mention of voting records MUST include refs to the articles that show he keeps them through deception
- 07:1007:10, 2 July 2006 diff hist +643 Joe Lieberman Balancing a section
- 06:4306:43, 2 July 2006 diff hist +405 m Talk:Joe Lieberman Quick explanation
- 06:2406:24, 2 July 2006 diff hist −19 Joe Lieberman You can't say a "signature issue," as it is point of view.
- 06:2106:21, 2 July 2006 diff hist −1,055 m Joe Lieberman Cleaning up my own mistake
- 06:0506:05, 2 July 2006 diff hist +1,084 Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance Request
- 05:5905:59, 2 July 2006 diff hist +269 User talk:K13060 →[[Joe Lieberman]] edit war: /
- 05:5205:52, 2 July 2006 diff hist +1 m Joe Lieberman LionO, you may have some good info to add. If you would do it without taking out other good info, I'd read it and let it remain if verified.
- 05:5005:50, 2 July 2006 diff hist −78 Joe Lieberman Consensus of editors is consensus. You don't understand Wiki and have never edited an article before your crusade here.
- 05:4505:45, 2 July 2006 diff hist +216 User talk:K13060 →[[Joe Lieberman]] edit war: /
- 05:4305:43, 2 July 2006 diff hist +836 Talk:Joe Lieberman →K13060/LionO dispute
- 05:3705:37, 2 July 2006 diff hist +341 Talk:Joe Lieberman →K13060/LionO dispute
- 05:3505:35, 2 July 2006 diff hist +767 Joe Lieberman You are vandalizing the page so fast that I can't keep up; all I can do is change it back. If you were reasonable, I'd try to work with what good info you are adding.
- 05:3205:32, 2 July 2006 diff hist +377 User talk:LionO Vandalism is not allowed
- 05:2405:24, 2 July 2006 diff hist −2,228 Joe Lieberman CONSENSUS and ACCURATE version by RobLA. Consensus does trump anything, because there won't be consensus over an unfair statement. He removed one of mine, too...which was okay with me.
- 05:1705:17, 2 July 2006 diff hist −10 Joe Lieberman Right. Accuracy. Your source does not say that he wants to be sure to protect the rights of adults to these games. In fact, he at the very least suggests they shouldn't be made AT ALL.
- 05:1505:15, 2 July 2006 diff hist −255 Joe Lieberman Again, removal and burying of accurate content. Respect consensus and do not POV-load.
