Jump to content

User talk:TheresNoTime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




CheckUser and conflict of interest VRT appointments, November 2024

[edit]

The Arbitration Committee is pleased to appoint the following user to the CheckUser team following private and public consultation:

In addition, the following administrators are appointed to the conflict of interest volunteer response team following private and public consultation:

The Committee thanks everyone who participated and helped bring this process to a successful conclusion.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § CheckUser and conflict of interest VRT appointments, November 2024

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, TheresNoTime. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-47

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, TheresNoTime. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-48

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, TheresNoTime. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

[edit]
@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: aw, thank you! — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 12:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

8 years! Thanks Gerda ArendtTheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 12:10, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju

[edit]

Based on the closure, I am wondering if the behavioral evidence was examined for Sunuraju. Of any SPI I filed in the last 10 years, this is one I feel is 100% accurate. We are getting lots of issues with these SOCKS an as stated I can provide a wall of additional information to show the connection. They are very careful to avoid technical evidence. CNMall41 (talk) 17:33, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging both @Girth Summit: and @Izno: who was involved as well in case they reviewed the behavioral evidence. I didn't receive a reply to my Nov 16th comment so not sure if additional information was/is needed to evaluate. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Undid the close — might be worth following up on that SPI, given it's remained open without any further comments since the middle of November. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 18:23, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it. Normally I would move on but this SOCK is BLUDGEONING. What would you suggest as I don't want to muddy the waters with so much information that it is delayed further? I feel that I already included so much information that it is going to be time consuming for a reviewer and they may not want to review it. Not saying that is the case but want to make it as easy as possible for those reviewing and making the decision. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]