User talk:1900saye

Speedy deletion nomination of Kirarippedbean

Hello 1900saye,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kirarippedbean for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe and Shaun Mysteries

The article Joe and Shaun Mysteries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability at WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Vernon, Washington. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. - Brianhe (talk) 05:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of USS Defiant (NCC-1764-A)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as USS Defiant (NCC-1764-A), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brianhe (talk) 23:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of US Presidential Election, 2024 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US Presidential Election, 2024 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Presidential Election, 2024 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 21:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from United States presidential election, 2020 into US Presidential Election, 2024. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted good faith edits on Jack Douglass

Hi 1900saye,

I've reverted your edit on Jack Douglass. In this case, "Network" refers to the multi-channel network Jacksfilms is a part of. YouTube is the service where his videos are uploaded, not the network. Jack is partnered with the MCN 'Fullscreen'. Based on his Twitter bio referring to a Fullscreen email address, this information is still up to date.

Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. I'm happy to discuss more if you have questions or concerns. — Geesi (talk) 06:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]