User talk:Anyrobinhood

Speedy deletion nomination of Gala Tent

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gala Tent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GLG GLG (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Being registered at the IPO isn't enough - that merely indicates existence. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a directory, and we require that notability be shown for subjects. For companies, please see WP:CORP and also WP:RS about the reliable independent sources you need to provide to prove the notability. Peridon (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Mace

The article Jason Mace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional biography by somebody connected to the subject, if not the subject himself. The awards are not convincing. Some of the references are not convincing (e.g. YouTube). Much here is unconvincing. There may be a very little genuine notability but it does not seem to justify an article far less a hagiography.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 21:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Gala Tent Ltd (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Mace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Mace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Mace until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DanielRigal (talk) 22:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]