Jump to content

User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU/Archive 28

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30→Archive 35
Leave a message Send an Email

Fuck and vandalism

I see no vandalism, but I do see edit warring and have blocked accordingly. Please though read WP:VANDALISM carefully - that's a content dispute, not vandalism. Doug Weller talk 15:23, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

My changes were fair — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.64.37.72 (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2016)

Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Homework

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Sponge (material) • Dress

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Tarpenning

Dear Captain Raju,

Very simply. This person was doping. This person received a 2 year ban for doping, which ended his career. This person has been posting fake citations and reasoning on this Wiki page for years, which are simply UNTRUE. There are literally hundreds of citations all over the net speaking about his ban, they are easily findable and clickable, there is nothing published anywhere that says, "such a ban could not happen today" or whatever fictional line this person repeatedly throws into the page, along with a fake link that leads nowhere (and there is nowhere on the USTF or any other athletics website that says anything like this). Furthermore if one looks at the commentary, it is obvious that this person is editing his own wiki page, with comments such as, "come and see me and I'll show you", which could even be construed as threatening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.242.59.74 (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #237

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
  • Development
    • Adding new wikis to interwiki sort order and move sort orders to WMF config. phab:T111023

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here.


Change to Natasha page

Hi Captain Raju,

I would like to dispute your undoing of my contribution. "Columbia" should be "Colombia" on that page, and is a typo. I can re-do the contribution but leave more adequate documentation. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natokr (talk • contribs) 20:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-48

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes this week

  • When someone tries to log in to a blocked account they will be blocked by a cookie. This means their browser will be blocked even if they change their IP address. This makes it more difficult for returning vandals. [1]
  • When you use Content Translation to adapt a template to a new translation it will work differently. You can adapt big templates such as infoboxes. Translators will have control over the template parameters. A first version of this is released this week. It is possible it will not work correctly with all templates. There will be more updates for this soon. [2]
  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 November. It will be on all wikis from 1 December (calendar).
  • Gadgets will have a new option called "hidden". This means you can register gadgets that can't be turned on or off from the preferences page. Hiding gadgets was already possible by using [rights=hidden]. You should now use [hidden] instead. [rights=hidden] in old gadgets should be changed to [hidden]. [3][4]

Meetings

  • You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 29 November at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Reflecting Party and Play --- Real Defintions / Real Science / Real Neutrality

I am not sure why there is such a resistance to modifcation of the Party and Play page as it should be. AS IT STANDS -- IT IS HOMOPHOBIC IN IT'S CREATION AND OVER-EMPASIS ON GAY M4M and Meth Usage.

Do you agree?

I will as I have with JamesBWatson who deleted my talk discussion --- then I placed this below to him -- then he restored my debate.

CARE TO DEBATE THESE ISSUES?

Following The Rules : Neutrality

Dear Mr. Watson. I accept your explication, but I would like to place this back into a debate and a correction of this article. I am not sure how best to do this. My name is James M Driskill. There is substantial evidence that the article that is presently on the Wikipedia presented for many years is in fact bias to the truth. That bias places certain misunderstandings of this term into the memeplex of the society which is highly questionable to the motives and cause to effects of how the usage of this misunderstanding is used and can be used and/or abused upon users of the information society. I am not attempting to self-promote myself -- except that what I have to express is the truth. Before you delete me [ censor ] would you please open and read in full both the plato.standford.edu article and Computing and Moral Responsibility as well as the legal law brief of Kang on Information Privacy also at .ntia.doc.gov-PDF Both these position papers reflects what is necessary and in the correction of information online. That is in fact my only mission here. Thank you. BTW: If you look at the domain registration of realuphuman.net --- you will find that the Corp Name I hold this under is "In The Mindway" -- Would you please conduct your own google.books search for this phrase and realize that I am indeed a contributing source to this wikipedia's book title : Information Theory : Last Chapter Meme Information Warfare Also for clarity, you may delete my comments outright -- but they were substainally archived at this location : realuphuman.net/WebDomains/en.wikipedia.org/Party and Play I think maybe the tag was added because of all the homophobic subtext? A completely naive reader only reading this article might be led to think sex on meth was a purely gay phenomenon. PNP might be gay slang, but I highly doubt gay men are the only people who have sex while high. Quodfui (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC) 

 Thank You Kindly For The Restoration Of My Talk Discussion
 It is much much apprecated.     — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealUpHuman (talk • contribs) 22:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CAPTAIN RAJU! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:42, Tuesday, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Userpage review?

Question: I got a notification that my user page was reviewed - "The page User:Chrissymad has been reviewed" by CAPTAIN RAJU, was just curious what that was about and if it was related to the speedy deletion spam I got yesterday from a troll? Thanks! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

hllo EusufHasan (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

regarding kalamanch

hello..... my name is siddharth who just created a kalamanch page.....

i guess u have some issues regarding it....plz share with me..


regards, siddharth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalamanch (talk • contribs) 19:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Children of Sanchez

twitch.tv/C_O_Sanchez — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoSanchez (talk • contribs) 17:36, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Too fast

You applied this tag too quickly. Clearly, the editor was in the process of building the article, but you tagged it for "no content" within two minutes of its creation. In general, I like to give a user some time to develop their article before tagging (except for egregious cases of spam, attack pages or copyright violations). My general rule of thumb is to allow at least 15 minutes after creation. Anything faster is too bitey and discourages new editors. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:48, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Overhasty CSD tagging

Heyo CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your A3 tagging of a new article, two minutes after its creation. It is stated on the policy page that at least a few minutes should be spared before using A1 or A3 to give the author some time to come up with content. I usually wait for 10-15 minutes before using either of them and some admins recommend even more. It is only to give a fair chance to the newcomers who aren't exactly aware as to how Wikipedia functions. Best, Yash! 17:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

CAPTAIN RAJU, you've got multiple editors letting you know that your Newpage Patrolling quality needs to improve. You are patrolling pages too soon after their creation, you are hastily adding CSD A1 and A3 tags to brand new articles, and you are not showing any responsiveness to feedback on your talk page. The next step is a topic ban, but everyone would much prefer if you can fix your behavior instead. VQuakr (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

三唑仑去哪买1

Just wanted to give you a heads up because I realize 三唑仑去哪买1 was in another language but even so it's gibberish (and spam, think spam emails like "buy this drug" followed by a bunch of nonsensical sentences.) edit: it's about where to purchase triazolam followed by something about Utah... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 20:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Pan Am 103

You appear to have reverted an edit I made in the above article, asking "in what way is this (cited) article erroneous?" As I indicated quite clearly, I explained this in detail on the Talk page for the article. I would be grateful if you would read this explanation and engage in some dialogue if you disagree with any of it, rather than reverting my edit so high-handedly. Morag Kerr (talk) 01:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@Morag Kerr: You've misunderstood the edit summary here. Captain Raju didn't revert your edit. clpo13 did that; the revert was to the last version that was edited by Captain Raju. You want to complain to clpo13, not Captain Raju. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:57, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much for clarifying that point. I initially did remonstrate with clpo13 on his talk page, but when I looked again at the edit page I thought I might have made a mistake and should have addressed Captain Raju. It appears I was right the first time! The page still stands as I left it now anyway. So apologies, and thanks. Morag Kerr (talk) 21:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your talk page

Friendly request: please get rid of the bright colours on your talk page. Certain users with colour deficiencies or sensory processing issues like myself (or even people that suffer from migraines brought on by bright lights/colours), may find reading your TP difficult. Wikipedia has a non-discrimination policy which underlines the issues certain people have when trying to read articles or pages with non-compliant colours. For more information, please see this and this. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 12:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Along the same lines (and echoing a discussion you and I had about a year ago), could you please change your signature to a font that is actually legible? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Seconded - thanks WikiDan61 for mentioning that. Patient Zerotalk 13:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Agreed. This page unfortunately almost makes my eyes bleed (so bright blue). Qed237 (talk) 13:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

my comment was removed as it was not considered constructive.

I made an edit to the top of the Square Inc. Page listing my experience with the company and attempting to contact customer support directly. I believe the information is very helpful as many users are lead to believe they have access to customer support between 6am and 6pm pst, when in fact this is a bold faced lie. The turn around time for customer questions is 1-2 business days. I have a question that needed to be resolved within 30 min and was more or less told to sit and spin. I would like my edit to be kept on the page. but please feel free to move to any area you see fit. I believe the people researching customer service for their merchant service should know there is no direct customer support offered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CB03:9960:4442:263D:D2C6:A952 (talk) 19:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Constructive edit of Auiones reverted by STiki

Hello Captain Raju, I just found that my modification of article Auiones was reverted automatically and flagged as testing/vandalism. The sentence in Latin I had corrected was incomplete as can be seen from the citation of the same text in article Nerthus. Please correct the citation yourself. Best regards, Joachim Schnitter (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

You seem to revert constructive edits by flagging them as vandalism. If you have no clue about the validity please consult Nerthus which contains the same Latin text or consult Tacitus' Germania.The Latin text is incomplete. Try to find the Latin words for river (flumen) and forest (silva) to understand what is missing. Joachim Schnitter (talk) 07:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Information icon Hello CAPTAIN RAJU. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at MHPS DONGFANG BOILER CO.,LTD. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 00:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Melba Patillo Beals

Well, I was trying to add a picture of her in the info box. I added a link where it asked, but when I saved it, it didn't appear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerry424 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Kerry424, It's my pleasure that you found my page and liked that too.You need to upload file to add photos to a wiki page. to upload a file go to this page but remember it that, You can only upload FREE files.Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

My edits are CORRECT

My edits are correct edits about the eps from trivium as stated by the Trivium Website its self and from Matt Heafy in an interveiw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ65KMTjCnI, http://store.trivium.org/ember-to-inferno-ab-initio-deluxe-cd.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgspike (talk • contribs) 18:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2, 2016 Ceremony of Carols

I am a member of a group of university students editing the Benjamin Britten's Ceremony of Carols article as part of a class project. We're currently working from multiple computers to add a large amount of information to the page. We have everything drafted up, it's a simple matter of putting it all in the editor and formatting it, which will take a bit of time. I'm posting this message at 13:27 EST, and we should be finished no later than 15:00 EST. If you could hold off on flagging or editing that particular article until then, it would be very much appreciated. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JHughen1 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Lucki Starr Page

Hi! The page I made about Lucki Starr is a page I created because she's a solo artist and is important, having the credits to prove so. I'm not sure why the page was deleted because it is " about myself" when I am nothing but a huge supporter of Lucki Starr. Can you please shed some light on how I can fix the page and get it back as I did work really hard on it. Thanks Luckistarrfanpage (talk) 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Mangifera indica edit

Hi Captain Raju,

If you read the revision, and open the reference it refers to (which was already existing before the revision), it mentions it in the source. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.69.22.122 (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Dear sir, i want to read the philippines drug war article in telugu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prashanth857 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

User:Patroller1

Why User Edit Me talk page Patroller1 (talk · contribs) 7:47PM, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Patroller1, I editing your user page because,you have no user rights on english Wikipedia.See following this page.Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:06, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanking

Thanks a lot Tahia Akter Chowdhury (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Swimming to Cambodia

Hi,

I wanted to add that "documentary now!", A parody show by IFC aired an episode parodying "Swimming to Cambodia". It is Season 2 Episode 3 and it is called "Parker Gail's Location Is Everything"

see link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_Now!#Season_2_.282016.29

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.44.221 (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2016)

Three Martinis
Hello, CAPTAIN RAJU.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Three-martini lunch

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Homework • Sponge (material)

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAPTAIN_RAJU/Archive_28&oldid=1075863049"