User talk:CrazyC83/archive6

Deletion review for Kady Malloy

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kady Malloy. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Facha93 (talk) 17:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable absences

Not only were the Memphis tornadoes on Super Tuesday very near downtown, but another near miss that few will ever know was Nashville. The supercell produced large intense tornadoes that killed multiple people both before and after passing directly over Nashville, but during that time the mesocyclone was phasing and in the non-tornado portion of the cycle. A few more miles/minutes and a modern catastrophe paralleled only by Katrina might have occurred. Evolauxia (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Now that {{StormWatch}} got deleted, I think the best way to do it will be to use {{Current disaster|event=tornado outbreak|time=potential|link=no}}.

As for the watches, I think the best way to do it would be a bulleted list at the top of the section. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 21:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

It will probably be needed, so I started one. User:CWY2190/0409outbreak. -CWY2190(talk • contributions) 21:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mid-October 2007 tornado outbreak

The article Mid-October 2007 tornado outbreak you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mid-October 2007 tornado outbreak for things needed to be addressed. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 16:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Hall of Fame

I've been working on the Tropical cyclone WikiProject for almost four years now and I know that at times it can be pretty draining. Hurricanehink and I started a fun little thing two years ago called the Hurricane Hall of Fame (based on a concept I'd created much earlier). It works just like any other Hall of Fame: every year, five storms are voted in based on notability. Up until now, the voters were just me and Hink and the honorees were just Atlantic storms. Both of those are changing (hopefully). I'm trying to get more Project members involved in the voting and I'm going international this year. This ballot is for the Eastern Pacific. Following this election, I'll send out ballots for the Western Pacific and then perhaps the Indian Ocean...all leading up to the Atlantic ballot early this summer. I'd really appreciate your participation. It's just for fun; something to lower stress levels. I'll announce the winners next weekend. The nominees are...

1939 Long Beach Tropical Storm - Only tropical storm to make landfall in California in the 20th Century, killed in excess of 40 people at sea and in floods.
1959 Mexico Hurricane - deadliest Eastern Pacific storm in history, 1000-1800 dead.
Hurricane Tara - killed over 500 people in floods in central Mexico.
Hurricane Liza - over 600 people were killed in devastating floods in Baja California.
Hurricane Paul - slow-moving storm left over 1000 dead in Central America.
Hurricane Iniki - most damaging hurricane in Hawaii's history, causing $2.6 billion in uninflated damage.
Hurricane John - longest lived tropical cyclone ever recorded worldwide; 31 days.
Hurricane Ismael - caused devastating flooding that killed 116 people in Mexico.
Hurricane Linda - strongest Eastern Pacific storm ever recorded.
Hurricane Pauline - devastated Mexico, killing 230 people and causing $7.5 billion in damage.
Choose three of these that you most want in. Post your votes on my talk page. The five top vote-getters will be inducted.

-- §Hurricane E RICarchive 02:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tornado intensities

I've been trying to figure out how you get the EF intensities of all the tornadoes this year yet on the SPC page many don't show up. If you could show me where you get that information I'll gladly begin the List of US Tornadoes of 2008 article. That's really the only thing holding me back from helping you with that idea. Thanks, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, that'll be fun. Thanks again, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not a problem, can you give me the information you've gathered on the tornadoes since march? I'd greatly appreciate it so I can keep up with the "List of US tornadoes of 2008" article, which is not close to being up to date. You don't have to if it's too much trouble, I'll wait the extra 3-4 months to get the final info out. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

5/8 DYK

On 8 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article May 2008 tornado outbreak, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 18:58, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current outbreak

Have you seen the devestation in Colorado on CNN? If that is not even notable to start a tornado outbreak. Then please explain what is. --Kuzwa (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well *sighs* being in my annoyance. I didn't let you respond and started the article. You can request it for deletion if you like or we can leave it be. Link: Late May 2008 tornado outbreak. Thanks, for the explanation I will keep it in mind for future storm articles. :] --Kuzwa (talk) 19:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any official sandbox for the events of today? ;o --Kuzwa (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't give these out often, but...

		The Original Barnstar
		I've watched what you've been doing in regards to the article May 2008 Plains tornado outbreak, and I'm thoroughly impressed! I know that you've been working hard (and so have other editors) to make the article accurate, detailed, reliable, sourced, and complete, and your efforts have not gone unnoticed. Seeing as that particular tornadic outbreak went within 2 miles of my own house, and seeing as I watched the unnerving wall cloud from my own basement window, I very much appreciate what you do for Wikipedia to keep it accurate, timely, and informed. Again, thanks, and happy editing! Keeper \| 76 \| Disclaimer 22:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Koppen climate classification

The Koppen climate classification uses -3C/26.6F as the cfa/dfa line. Let me guess- you use 0C/32F as the borderline because of Cape Cod. The cfb climate should be called oceanic climate. Marine West Coast Climate doesn't exist. Anyway, are Los Angeles and San Francisco on the Mediterranean? No, but they have a Mediterranean climate. I also investigated some bird range maps recently and they tend to follow the 26.6F line over the 32F line. Of course, this was just an investigation of a few birds so don't take this so seriously. Press olive, win oil (talk) 19:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the current severe weather in the midwest

i get the feeling you live in the omaha/ketv viewing area?--Jakezing (talk) 02:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Weather

As one of the more active WP:METEO and WP:SEVERE contributors, could you have a look down at Portal:Weather and maybe comment on anything you don't like? The featured portal candidacy has gotten a little stale. Thanks!-Running On Brains 16:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Plasticup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Date linking

I see you restored linked dates at Hurricane Gustav (2008). I had removed them because there is inconsistency in date-linking in the article and, per WP:DATE#Date autoformatting, date autoformatting (linking) is deprecated. The reasons for this are at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Date autoformatting. --Elliskev 14:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upgraded infobox for image sizes or captions

29-Aug-2008: I have upgraded Template:Infobox_hurricane_current to use the more modern technology for infoboxes, to also allow image sizes/captions:

changed "class=toccolours" to be "class=infobox";
added new parameter "image_width" for "image" parameter;
added new parameter "track_width" for "track" parameter;
added new parameter "image_caption" for "image" parameter;
added new parameter "track_caption" for "track" parameter;
set default minimum box width as "280";
put internal comments, to explain coding as NOTES & HISTORY.

Hopefully, the parameter track_width will help to make the forecast-map somewhat larger than the previous mandatory postage-stamp size. The infobox had been created back on 13July2006 when "class=toccolours" was used in many infoboxes. As customary, I have spent hours testing the changes (with both Firefox & IE browsers), in a separate user-space template, before releasing the changes to the live infobox template. -Wikid77 (talk) 05:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 29 August, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) Hurricane Gustav (2008), which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

Hurricane Gustav

Just read that Hurricane Gustav is a Category 5 hurricane. here, here —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.3.82 (talk) 20:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the warning box on Gustav...

I won't revert you, Crazy.. but I do think that it's worth having that box up there for a while. I certainly wouldn't worry about the Manual of Style in this context, because I think it's appropriate to bend the rules a little once in a while for strong reasons.... and our article is the second result in Google, so could well get quite a lot of traffic. Follow your conscience... :-) Privatemusings (talk) 03:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)this has been mentioned on WP:AN too, so I'll copy this note across there as well....[reply]

Ike, {{convert}}

Why did you remove {{convert}} which I've implemented in Hurricane Ike (2008)? ––Bender235 (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorological history of Hurricane Gustav

I saw that you mentioned it in the Gustav talk page comments. I have been writing it for a couple days, and it's a big one. I'd just hate for someone else to be writing it up as well... Plasticup ^T/C 13:31, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CrazyC83. You have new messages at Plasticup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tropical Storm Hanna edit conflict

Thank you for finishing the job that I started. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning your deletion of my edits

You removed my edit of the article Hurricane Ike. I don't know how it is not clear to you that what I added IS directly related to Canada.

From the article:

"Peter Boag, president of the Canadian Petroleum Products Institute, told CTV Newsnet that the spike in gas prices is due primarily to the bad weather in the Gulf Coast."

"The price hikes we're seeing and the price movements we're seeing over the short period of time are due to (the) supply disruption caused by the impending arrival of Hurricane Ike," he said."

NorthernThunder (talk) 02:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Ike deaths

Hi. Are deaths caused by falling trees or limbs direct or indirect? Please continue updating the Ike article and main season article. By the way it's pouring where I live. ~A H 1^(TCU) 23:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting Ike article will be slow

20-Sep-2008: I agree with you that the Hurricane Ike information will grow, especially after the notoriety sets in, when everyone will be saying, "Ike caused that too" and such. People visiting the Caribbean will also document more details about the infamous storm, such as local ships that sank or other details. It wasn't me creating the names "Giant Ike" or "Colossal Ike" because the sources I read described Ike as "twice the size of Katrina". The boardwalks in Galveston where found washed along the shoreline 3 blocks to the west, but at the back of the storm, the winds would switch to the east, washing people out to sea towards Florida (although oil rigs are out there, 20 miles out). Several blogs/forums are asking about hundreds of missing people. From that infamy, Ike news webpages will remain on the Internet for months, as future reference documents. Hence, many other people will help expand these webpages as time passes. Thanks for seeing the true impact, and rest assured that many people will help expand the details. -Wikid77 (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Storm history" has been changed to "Meteorological history"

On the project talk page we decided that "Meteorological history" was a more accurate title. See the discussion for more details. Plasticup ^T/C 03:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

WikiProject Tropical cyclones, awards you this **Cyclone Barnstar** for your great work

You were selected as the Member of the Month in the September issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter. Congratulations! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Election 2008

Since we are both doing this at the same time, might I suggest that we take turns doing this, to prevent the many edit clashes that we seem to have? Warfreak (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using an interactive map that uses the same data as you do. I'll update this peroidically as well, this will prevent us having massive edit clashes. Maybe we do it once every few minutes? Warfreak (talk) 23:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- Better that way, it allows us to remove conflicting data from the election page since some counties retracted their votes.

NY Times

Congrats, you made into the New York Times, well at least the online edition, see Wikipedia Enters the Fray, the 7:28 pm entry. Голубое сало/Blue Salo (talk) 00:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we both made the New York Times, did you get an interview or some questions by Noam Cohen as well? Warfreak (talk) 00:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi I am Yellow Evan add I was looking at the edit history of your userpage and so that at the edit of the season that you do the articles for storms that dont have ones already. Since every storms has an article already mabey you could help us out in the 2008 Pacific hurricane season. if you are are against do articles for every storm in the EPAC explain your thoughts at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical Cyclones#Articles for every storm. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home ,Sandbox Happy Veterans day

Typhoon Xangsane

Hi, I noticed that you nominated Typhoon Xangsane for GA in 2006. You may be interested to know that I'm putting it up for peer review. TheCoffee (talk) 20:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf stream

It is up for reassessment, again, and I have fixed it, again. Why don't you claim the Gulf Stream GA on your main page? Didn't you nominate it originally? Thegreatdr (talk) 16:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had to search through the article history to see who did. It's odd to continually have to redefend a GA, due to ever-stricter GA standards. No wonder the articles within wikipedia appear to be getting worse, grade-wise. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tropical Depression Nineteen (2005)

A tag has been placed on Tropical Depression Nineteen (2005), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Cyclone biskit 18:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Severe weather project naming conventions

Hi, I know it's been a while, but since you were the original author of the Tornado Naming Conventions, I figured I'd drop you a line and let you know that I proposed some changes at the project talk page. Let me know what you think. Thanks! -Running On Brains 04:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

Just because I saw you were editing Tornadoes of 2009, here's some info as I am not going to be on to update this.

Large tornado in Ardmore, possible injuries/fatalities as well as extensive damage.

Possible PDS watch in the near future.

Just some things to look out for.

Regards, Inferno, Lord of Penguins 02:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed fatalities - just out. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 02:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009 Lone Grove, Oklahoma tornado

Since this tornado is proving to be extremely deadly, I'm planning on making an article for it, as a subarticle to the outbreak one. If you would, any information you have on it from the SPC, NOAA, etc... would be much appreciated. If you could, just leave the links on my talk page. Thanks, Cyclone biskit 12:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with NWS warning archive?

Tornado emergency (emergencies?) Issued today, but I need to be able to cite the archive for today. Any clue how? Thanks. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 23:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments needed

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active participant in WikiProject Meteorology, WikiProject Severe weather, and/or WikiProject Non-tropical storms. I have made a proposal to start an official assessment page for these three projects, under the WP:METEO banner. Since this would need significant participation to work properly, I'd like input from as many interested parties as possible (even those who may not watch the project pages), so please visit the discussion here and leave your thoughts/opinions. Thanks! -Running On Brains 02:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Alabama tornadoes

I noticed you added EF-scale rankings for today to Tornadoes of 2009. Were these confirmed? I can't find any NWS or news source that has these.-Running On Brains 02:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa McGhee

I need to look closer to give opinions on anyone but Melissa. You mean a redirect and not a delete correct? --User:Woohookitty ^{Diamming fool!} 16:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna write about a huricane but i cant find my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by NoduloMan (talk • contribs) 18:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Hernandez and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are David Hernandez, Amanda Overmyer, Chikezie, Ramiele Malubay, Syesha Mercado, Brandon Rogers (singer), Stephanie Edwards (singer), Gina Glocksen, Haley Scarnato, Chris Richardson. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hernandez for David Hernandez, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Overmyer for Amanda Overmyer, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikezie for Chikezie, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramiele Malubay for Ramiele Malubay, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syesha Mercado for Syesha Mercado, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Rogers (singer) (2nd nomination) for Brandon Rogers (singer), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Edwards (singer) (2nd nomination) for Stephanie Edwards (singer), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen (2nd nomination) for Gina Glocksen, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato (2nd nomination) for Haley Scarnato, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Richardson for Chris Richardson. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for rollback

I am looking at my watchlist using my iPod, and I accidentally pressed rollback and I'm so sorry. Darren 23 (Contribs) 21:12, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jesse Langseth

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jesse Langseth, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Langseth. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aspects (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mishavonna Henson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mishavonna Henson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mishavonna Henson. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aspects (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Severe weather RfC

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rick

May I please see a link to the Best Track? You claimed Rick has 175 mph winds and a 914 mbar pressure according to it... --Dylan 620 (contribs, logs, review) 01:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello CrazyC83! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Brandon Rogers (singer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:32, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost interview?

I've noticed you seem to be active in editing WikiProject Severe Weather articles, and I'm having trouble finding an active member, so would you be interested in doing an interview for the Wikipedia Signpost on behalf of WikiProject Severe Weather? The interview would be featured as the WikiProject report in the March 1st issue of the Signpost. If so, please answer the questions here by February 27-28th. Thanks in advance, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 20:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References on Tornadoes of 2010

Can we try and keep the references in that article filled out mostly/completely, preferably with one of the citation templates, rather than just bare-bones URLs? I'd like to try and make that a good article at the end of 2010. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 21:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Siobhan Magnus and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Siobhan Magnus, Katie Stevens. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhan Magnus for Siobhan Magnus, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katie Stevens for Katie Stevens. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Garcia

A tag has been placed on Andrew Garcia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 05:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Lacey Brown

I have nominated Lacey Brown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacey Brown. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wintonian (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes of 2010 - April 22

You may want to split this off into a separate outbreak page, with 26 tornadoes reported. Even if only 15-20 of these reports confirm, I think it could survive as a standalone article due the fact more severe weather is expected tomorrow, including the risk for "strong and long track tornadoes". Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 01:22, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per your sandbox article, can we add a column at the far right of the table linking to the specific source (using ref naming) for each tornado per this discussion? I'd rather not get into a hassle about this if the article ever reaches a FAC or FLC (should the table need split off the main article). Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on my talk page. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That Texas tornado occurred on the 24th, either at 145am where it happened or 645 UTC...whichever you go by, it should be under the April 24th tornadoes. Remember that the SPC's storm reports go 12Z-12Z (7am-7am Central time), not midnight to midnight, so events after midnight need to be placed under the following day's events in our articles. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 01:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should create a list of tornadoes article like this one. Truthsort (talk) 00:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April-May 2010 tornado outbreak

Someone beat you to creating this, so I went ahead and added your sandbox material to the article. Also, keep an eye on Arkansas especially today, as the SPC pretty much maxed out the probablilities in a PDS watch for the area. I suggest (if you have the time) monitoring this media outlet, as yesterday they put up a live video stream of their severe weather coverage once the stuff got rolling. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 21:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Michael (2000)

Hi CrazyC83, I don't think we have talked before. Well anyway, you are a major contributor to Hurricane Michael (2000), so you can participate in the FAC of Hurricane Michael (2000). Thank you, --12george1 (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010 Oklahoma tornado outbreak

May 2010 Oklahoma tornado outbreak seems to be a bit hyperactive in how long the tornado outbreak is claimed to have continued. I'm pretty sure it was only May 10-12 for the first weather system, so unless the 13-15 were active enough to call it a tornado outbreak sequence, I would say they aren't a part of this outbreak. As far as I know, the 10th was the first day of the outbreak, the 11th a day of minimal activity, the 12th was activity when the system was lifting back north as a warm front/dry line, and then the system pushed east and stopped producing tornadoes. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 22:21, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June Outbreak

Good job keeping the tornado box up to date for the June 2010 tornado outbreak. Im curious do we have this tornado in the box yet? -Marcusmax(speak) 01:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Juliancolton (talk) 18:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Verify edit

You might want to take a look at this edit and verify it...I reverted the same editor adding 53 EF0's to the Mid-June outbreak's small chart, but I'm not involved enough with Tornadoes of 2010 to tell whether this edit is good or false. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...

HI! Just wondering, do you happen to be MiamiHurricanes09 on wunderground.com? Thanks! TDI19 (talk) 21:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK! Thanks! :D TDI19 (talk) 21:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not MH09. I'm one of his friends, however. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010 tornado outbreak

Storm data is out for all the outbreaks listed on this page, and for at least April-May 2010 tornado outbreak, the tornado table is way off. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 14:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That edit by me that changed the tornado totals was based off the NCDC Storm Events Database...did I get the totals wrong when I looked it up or something? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 01:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good News!

Another good news is waiting to reach you. Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for Igor

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	I hereby award you this barnstar for helping the Hurricane Igor article to be of its current quality, which is impressive considering the article's short existence. Well done. Thegreatdr (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Lambert for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Alex Lambert, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Lambert until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neutralhomer • Talk • 07:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC) 07:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Julia

The only problem is, the 2 main RBT's don't have it. Thegreatdr (talk · contribs) said in Talk:2010 AHS that "If all else fails, ask yourself who the primary source for such information in the Atlantic basin is. The answer will come to you quickly. I would imagine this would be a rare event, since all that NRL stuff is driven by NHC information, at least I thought it was." So, my thinking is until the NHC changes the GE BT (which is the one they update now, apparently), then we should stay with the advisory info. Darren 23^Edits|Mail 20:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 24th in Tornadoes of 2010

I'm not entirely sure, but wasn't the storm system that spawned the tornadoes October 24th in the south a separate storm system from the one presently spawning damaging winds and tornadoes? I was under the impression that the storms on the 24th were spawned by one system that went off elsewhere, and the current ones were spawned by a system that just ejected east across the plains yesterday. If so, would it be wise to split off the 24th from the section for the 24th-26th? Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 18:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SophiaBLiu's Research Request

My name is Sophia and I am a PhD student at University of Colorado in Boulder researching the use of social media for historically significant crises like Hurricane Katrina. I am interested in what kind of values and practices are emerging from these disasters especially with the use of ubiquitous technologies like blogs and social media sites like Wikipedia. I am contacting you because I noticed you are one of the top contributors of the Hurricane Katrina Wikipedia article. I was wondering if you would be open to answering some questions for my dissertation research on this topic. One example of a question I have is: You provided a considerable amount of edits to the Hurricane Katrina Wikipedia article. What kind of edits did you make? What story was being told before you edited the article and how does that differ from what is in Wikipedia now? Feel free to email me at Sophia.Liu@colorado.edu if you have any questions. Thanks for your time, Sophia --Sophiabliu (talk) 05:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tornadoes of 2010

Just wondering, why do you keep removing the European tornadoes? Although I don't put much information into the bits, there is a lot more available for them. I only put the single sentence just so their existence is known and others can improve upon it from there. The recent Portuguese tornado, which injured 42 people, definitely deserves note on the article at the least. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]