Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barstool Sports (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete G4, A7, take your pick -- Y not? 21:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barstool Sports

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web content. There aren't multiple independent sources which cover the website to a non-trivial extent. Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 06:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree thoroughly. Barstool Sports is in the top 5,000 sites worldwide, and is a noted sports blog, having been featured multiple times on 20/20, Inside Edition, sportscenter. It additionally holds parties that have created stateside buzz for now worldwide acts such as Mac Miller and avicii. That said, the current entry needs a massive amount of work. -TMcCarthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.58.4 (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see there was an AfD and conclusion to delete in 2009 as well. I doesn't look like anything significant has changed since then. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 07:06, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:08, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you give me a day, I am planning on making this article full of enough sourced content. I do not think it should be deleted. This is a huge blog on the internet, especially among college students and the New England area, and it receives a lot of press. I can list multiple sources which have covered the activities and people behind the blog. 24.60.119.82 (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - per A7. Article is about real web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.