Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carley Gracie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gracie family. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carley Gracie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a member of Gracie family doesn't automatically make you notable Nswix (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Martial arts, and Brazil. Nswix (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gracie family. Not independently notable. Carson Wentz (talk) 03:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The Gracie's are as notable as it gets in MMA. The article has been around for years and is only under threat due to new rules that were poorly thought out and seemingly made to assist with deletion. His article is not harming anyone, so keep it.KatoKungLee (talk) 03:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gracie family. Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. Alvaldi (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gracie family. There is no evidence that the subject meets any SNG for WP. He doesn't appear to meet any SNG and notability is not inherited. He also doesn't have any references that show significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. Interviews are not sufficient. Papaursa (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gracie family. Doesn't independently pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:45, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.