Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClearTax (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ClearTax

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable and promotional, though several good editors have tried removing some of the worst of it. Kept as non-consensus in 2015, but I think our standards are higher now. DGG ( talk ) 19:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment just for clarity - I have now removed additional promotional content and unsourced claims (see edit history for earlier versions), but have not removed any of the previous sources. Most sources are just business announcements and overhyped PR interviews, but a few of them might have enough journalistic substance for a weak keep even by our current standards (not sure yet) - will need to think about this a bit more. GermanJoe (talk) 21:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 21:17, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- just a promo blurb, with routine coverage of funding, partnerships and clients served! This content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- promo piece, not notable and fails WP:Corp. Kierzek (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indicia of encyclopedic notability. bd2412 T 19:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.