Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalmi station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dalmi station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling the AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade (talk) 01:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea. Jumpytoo Talk 08:54, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wonjong station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Neunggok station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.

Redirect ALL to Seohae Line#Stations Djflem (talk) 11:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There was consensus to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station, so I don't think we can redirect all of these. Not a bundled nom, each should be treated separately for now. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect this particular one taking into account the aforementioned Wonjong station AfD case.Suitskvarts (talk) 12:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references from the corresponding Korean article. Someone with better language skills and local knowledge could probably find more. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Eastmain. JaventheAldericky (talk) 20:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the references added by Eastmain establish notability. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.