Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siheung Neunggok station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ considering particularly that the additional references have satisfied all editors who evaluated them. (non-admin closure) Actualcpscm (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Siheung Neunggok station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NTRAINSTATION, "Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline." This article has been live since 2022 and does not appear to meet general notability guidelines (unless perhaps the Korean-language articles bring to light notability). A Google search has provided no additional sources to prove notability. ETA: Apologies for not bundling AfDs. I'm learning! Significa liberdade (talk) 01:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and South Korea. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wonjong station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung Daeya station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Sinhyeon station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siheung City Hall station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Siu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Wonsi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Seonbu station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.
Note that Dalmi station also has a discussion in Articles for Deletion.

Redirect>>Seohae Line. Djflem (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, merge or redirect. All railway stations that verifiably (a) exist, (b) previously existed, or (c) are under construction should be blue links, if they are not individually notable then they should be merged and/or redirected to the most suitable article (usually the one about the line or system they belong to). No determination of notability should me made without having at least searched for sources contemporary to the station written in the local language. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This !vote applies equally to all the AfDs linked above. Thryduulf (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There was consensus to keep at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonjong station, so I don't think we can redirect all of these. Not a bundled nom, each should be treated separately for now, as consensus is not homogenous between nominations. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:04, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Redireсt~~ Keep per edits since nomination. Suitskvarts (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. I suspect that someone fluent in Korean and familiar with the area served by the recently-opened subway line could find more good references for each of the stations. I don't have the fluency or the local knowledge, so all I can do is refer to the corresponding article in the Korean Wikipedia and Google searches. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis that the new references added into the article are sufficient to pass WP:GNG. JaventheAldericky (talk) 14:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.