Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-Town Elite Floorball Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 19:01, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- E-Town Elite Floorball Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Even from the article's creator, there are no reliable sources for the existence of this team, and only 4 Google hits total for its existence. Corvus cornixtalk 02:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this team is purely speculative, it is a long time between now and September. EraserGirl (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand that this page is considered for deletion, but as the author, I believe that it should be placed under the categories of Floorballor Floorball Teams. For example, the Bondi Rockets Floorball Club in Australia states no references. I do state references, but unfortunately they are from the actual League site, and that is supposedly discouraged by Wikipedia. Their club may have been around longer, but this page states more information. Please consider this before deletion. Unihockeypolska (talk) 18:48, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The references do not meet our requirements at WP:RS, and I would therefore oppose a merge. Corvus cornixtalk 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete This is obviousky a notable organization but without verifiable independent references the article must be deleted.Divinediscourse (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice for re-creation if and when this becomes notable. Right now it is barely above house league play; the players will get pocket money and barely more. Let's see if the local media care to report it before we take on the job of doing so. Risker (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.