Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Carlucci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 20:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Carlucci

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two sources, one self published. Large amount of content, little to none is cited. WP:NORESUMES TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TheManInTheBlackHat (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTCV. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and totally lacking WP:SIGCOV. He might be known in his sliver of the industry, but he's not known in the media. Much of the article reads like a LinkedIn page, and this appears to be very close to a WP:COPYVIO. In 2008, this could have been acceptable, but in 2022, everyone knows we are not a free web host nor social media. Bearian (talk) 02:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Due to WP:NOTCV. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.