Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Goldfeder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination with no other delete votes pending. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]
Non-Administrative Closure The result was keep. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Phillip Goldfeder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This politician doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN. He is an elected official, but the Politician notability guidelines say that just being an elected official does not meet the notability guidelines, and is therefore does not meet WP: POLITICIAN Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't meet WP: POLITICIAN. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep- Meets the primary clause of WP:POLITICIAN: Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature. (emphasis mine). The 'just being elected' caveat is for local officials. I'll add his conglinks momentarily. Dru of Id (talk) 00:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Dru of Id. Passes WP:POLITICIAN as a member of a state legislature. Subguideline #3 applies to local office holders. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it meets the criteria, as do all of the other members of NYS Assembly.Racingstripes (talk) 06:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - meets criteria. Can keep --Bharathiya 09:29, 11 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharathiya (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.