Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schizofonics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schizofonics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any secondary sources on the DJs Schizofonics (there is a California band with the same name). All the sources in article are social media. Does not meet notability requirement for bands Rogermx (talk) 19:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No secondary sources or significant coverage and no help from WP:NMUSIC. WP:FACEBOOKBAND appears closest match. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 02:57, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - MySpace and YouTube sites are not authoritative references.--Rpclod (talk) 03:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.