Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speedaway (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedaway

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article hasn't been notably improved in the 8ish years since I last tagged it, and BEFORE didn't pick up anything obvious I could use to improve it. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus.

Previous discussions: 2015-02 (closed as no consensus)

Logs: 2005-10 ✗ deleted

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Joseph2302 said it all. ImperialMajority (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.