Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thai e-Sports Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thai e-Sports Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, eSports in Thailand on the whole is not very notable. There seem to be some Thai language sources for this but they don't look reliable. Prisencolin (talk) 01:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject does not meet general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 02:03, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:58, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: An article covering the subject has been published by the online arm of Thairath, Thailand's largest newspaper, though it's written by the association's acting president.[1] --Paul_012 (talk) 07:09, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:09, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Little to no independent coverage. Article cited above is not independent. Smartyllama (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For an organisation, it is essential that WP:ORGDEPTH is satisfied. That is clearly lacking here. Also, sources need to be independent of the organisation or its employees. I don't see the indepth coverage in reliable and independent sources at the moment. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.