Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 March 19

< March 18	March 20 >

March 19

File:Wwfhllogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, uploaded only for deleted article and no other encyclopedic use. B (talk) 03:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tfr4ds123.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DCFC0361.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, too blurry to be useful and no explanation of what it is B (talk) 04:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kazaa EULA.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8 - we don't need to see a screenshot of the EULA to understand that the program installs spyware. B (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eviladamskull.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 04:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baglamukhi.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, I doubt the license is legitimate, and in any event too small to be useful B (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ljmu1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to File:The new logo for Liverpool John Moores University from 2013.png, see WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LJMU Varsity 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: should only be used in an article about the cup, but is currently used in another article. Stefan2 (talk) 10:31, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I.Blum BABengston.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Work of photographic art being used under a claim of fair use, not for commentary on the photographer or on the work of art itself, but on an article about Billy Al Bengston, one of the subjects in the photo. The image is not discussed in the article. B (talk) 12:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sweeney Knighted.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of a living person used under a claim of fair use. The image is used decoratively, does not enhance the text, and is not vital to the user's understanding of the topic. B (talk) 13:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wow that was from early in my Wikipedia career: the item is a representation of an event that will never happen again (i.e. unrepeatable), and their are no suitable freely licensed images for representing him: so I would think that qualifies as more that "decorative". But I don't specialize in these kinds of issues,Sadads (talk) 00:45, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zoe Hanna 2014.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn, will remove from the offending article, but it is still legitimate in the article about the character itself. --B (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot of a character in a TV show used to illustrate the actress, not the show B (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello B, I haven't really been on Wikipedia for some time, nowadays I only pop in every so often, but got an alert on my email, thanks. Anyhow, the screenshot is used in Zoe Hanna, which is the article about the character, so I'm not really sure where that fits in, as even when I was rather more prolific on Wikipedia, I never delved into FfD, but the screenshot is not being used to illustrate the actress, nor the show, but the show's character, which is apparently notable enough to deserve an article. Would you mind notifying me when you respond? Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:38, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcc: You are absolutely right, I'm not sure if I just missed it or if it was not showing up for some reason. Either way, I will close this request and simply remove it from the offending article. --B (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Birds bees.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic original research. Low Quality user generated image used once to illustrate The birds and the bees article. ★ Bigr Tex 14:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zane Williams "Texas Like That" Album cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CD album cover being used under a claim of fair use because it depicts the musician, not in an article about the CD itself. B (talk) 14:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sadananda.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file found in online and there is no valid EXIF. The seems as scanned image. Anton^Talk 14:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zachar sybieka narys.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scan of a copyrighted book cover, used decoratively in the article about the author with no discussion whatsoever of the book itself. B (talk) 14:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eden Gardens Front gate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in good faith, but this image constitutes a derivative work of the wall hanging it depicts and India has no freedom of panorama for 2D works. B (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

that poster is inscribed in the front gate of Eden Gardens ground...I still could not get the reason :( Thank you. Suman420 (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Suman420:, please see Commons:Commons:derivative works and, for more information, the Wikipedia article derivative work. When you take a photo of a copyrighted work of art, your photograph is considered to be a "derivative work" of that copyrighted artwork. So we cannot use the photo unless the underlying artwork is public domain or we have permission from the artist that created it. I hope this explanation helps. --B (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Whitman&rolax.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image used under a claim of fair use showing Christine Todd Whitman frisking someone. While certainly an interesting event, the photo does not show anything that you can't get from reading the text. Use of this photo under a claim of fair use fails WP:NFCC#8 as it is not key to the reader's understanding of the passage. B (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.