Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lllopqqp/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Lllopqqp

28 September 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Group 1:

Group 2:

Group 3:

Group 4:

Pro forma per checkuser. -- zzuuzz (talk) 02:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

03 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Editing BLP about Mainland Chinese people, and all edits are tagged as "Mobile edit" and "Mobile web edit". GZWDer (talk) 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

This first account has zero edits in English Wikipedia, but is confirmed to be part of a sockfarm with more than 100 socks in zhwiki. The second account is also suspected, but not yet confirmed since it is registered after the lastet checkuser. See also SPI in zhwiki.--GZWDer (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

both LadyyTheresa and AltaMesao edited Charles Chao, both AltaMesao and blocked user User:Sharonoster added privated content in Charles Chao (Special:Diff/1191031960/1191032151 vs Special:Diff/1176544298/1176544468). Considing en:User:Lllopqqp's sockpuppetry behaviour. I think a checkuser is nedded to find its sleepers. B.T.W, I think it's similar or equal to zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/长留上仙白子画 (SPI in ZHWiki)--Kethyga (talk) 07:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  •  In progress... Editing Chinese BLPs on mobile isn't enough justification to check dozens of accounts. However, I ran an initial check on LadyyTheresa and AltaMesao based on the evidence provided by Kethyga. Those are  Confirmed to each other and there's more where that came from... Spicy (talk) 22:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The following group is  Technically indistinguishable from each other. Note the impersonation usernames:
  • These are nominally  Inconclusive to past accounts, although there's something in the data that makes me think they are related. Spicy (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Checked Marcocapellel from the filing below due to the impersonation username and overlap with Patti Lam Wong. From there we have

03 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

both LadyyTheresa and AltaMesao edited Charles Chao, both AltaMesao and blocked user User:Sharonoster added privated content in Charles Chao (Special:Diff/1191031960/1191032151 vs Special:Diff/1176544298/1176544468). Considing en:User:Lllopqqp's sockpuppetry behaviour. I think a checkuser is nedded to find its sleepers. B.T.W, I think it's similar or equal to zh:Wikipedia:傀儡調查/案件/长留上仙白子画 (SPI in ZHWiki) Kethyga (talk) 07:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Please merge this to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lllopqqp Kethyga (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:game the system; a great many trivial edits to become extended confirmed user and then make controversial changes to Hu Jintao and Hu Haifeng. According to Lllopqqp's behavior, a check user is needed. Kethyga (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

20 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This account appears to exhibit identical editing patterns as previous sockpuppets of the user in question. shoeofdeath 05:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Already blocked per WP:DUCK, request a CU to check if there are any other accounts created on this IP. Are the IPs being used by this individual all on the same range? Perhaps a range block is in order? shoeofdeath 08:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Looks like another one. Should the IPs/IP ranges being utilized here not be hard-blocked for the time being? shoeofdeath 05:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found another (Shanghaixx), blocked already since it was active. shoeofdeath 06:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

More unsourced BLP additions to an article previously edited by this user. shoeofdeath 12:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • It's them plus
Spicy (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

30 January 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Gaming autoconfirmed to edit the same semi-protected article, once again. Blocked already, request a check for sleepers and a long-term hard-block of the IP. shoeofdeath 22:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found at least one of the aforementioned sleepers (September 11 Attacks). shoeofdeath 22:40, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Matches previous socks. I've also blocked Eric Xun Li (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). Someone with Chinese skills might want to follow them up on zhwiki. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


19 February 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Back again after a brief absence. Blocked already, request sleeper check as usual. shoeofdeath 11:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 April 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Remsense 12:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
  • My bad. The pattern of behavior is identical as compared to other sock puppets—stochastic removals and unsourced changes to articles about universities and contemperary Chinese politicians, and immediately blanks their user talk page when it is written on. Remsense 12:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Spicy (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21 April 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Found these two just now, both created back on 21 February. Request sleeper check as this user appears to be rather active lately. shoeofdeath 12:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  •  Confirmed to each other, plus
Spicy (talk) 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

5 June 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Identical editing patterns/articles edited as past accounts. Not quite as active as previous socks so have held off on blocking for the moment. Am pretty sure though. Sleeper check requested as usual. shoeofdeath 09:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  •  Confirmed:
Spicy (talk) 09:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18 July 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Obvious socks based on edits and account names. These are not very active but request a sleeper check in case there are any others I might have missed that are editing more prolifically. shoeofdeath 09:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are clearly sockpuppets of the user in question, no one else could possibly be responsible for Hu Haifeng inspired vandalism. That being said, these are in all likelihood one-off accounts with very few edits so I can understand the declined request. As it does not appear that this LTA is active at the moment this case can be closed and archived. shoeofdeath 09:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

1 September 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Unsourced BLP additions to prominent Chinese politician articles, focusing on family and educational background, almost all of which were previously edited by sockpuppets of this user. The first 4 accounts were all created within an hour of each other, the 5th is a few days older. Since it appears that the latest strategy for this LTA is to edit only one article with each new account created, I can only assume there are more accounts out there. shoeofdeath 08:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • blocked: