User talk:Theroadislong: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 22:47, 28 December 2024

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message

.

Penn Medicine BioBank

Hi,

I'm trying to write a page about the Penn Medicine BioBank, similar to the UK BioBank's: UK Biobank. This page has generally the same sections plus more than mine, so I'm unsure of why mine is being rejected. Thank you! JLD120 (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't submitted it for review? The previous draft was deleteted because it was a copyright violation, your latest version is blatant advertising, what is your connection? Theroadislong (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just submitted a new one, I tried to add a sentence and change my wording so it doesn't look like advertising, I'm just trying to add it to the list of biobanks and make a page for it.

I'm not connected to the subject- For one of my classes I get extra credit for contributing to Wikipedia about any topic in genetics, so I picked a biobank that hasn't been written about yet. I went off the formatting of the UK BioBank's page and sections. JLD120 (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The UK Biobank article has 90 sources, yours has two neither of which appear to be reliable or independent. Has your tutor read Wikipedia:School and university projects? Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will search for more sources! Thank you JLD120 (talk) 15:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to improve my draft - I'm new editor

My draft is about an Internship Program which i found interested in. Can you show me which paragraph reads like an advertisement, or which links doesn't reliable please. I just want to improve my draft. Miyano25 (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Top AfC Editor

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor
		In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...1746 reviews... but way below the top reviewer, must stop slacking! Theroadislong (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi theroadislong 👋

Hi , Manikingr (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I make it better

HheroadislongT Manikingr (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No...it is blatent advertising and you will be blocked the next time you remove maintenance templates from the draft. Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You Mentioned " Paid Editing " on my article

Recently you commented on my article " https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hafilat_Card" which is a draft that " Comment: still reads just like an advert, do you work for them by any chance? "

First of all, I do not work for anybody. That is not a paid editing. I just found out that it's not covered by any Wikipedian. So, I wrote on it. Second, if you found anything promotional, you can remove that.

Thanks, Asadullah272 (talk) 16:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Balkans Continued Fraction

Many thanks for your comment on the page I created. A secondary source that cites and reports about the conjecture is for instance the scholarly article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2321440121 According to Wikipedia "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences, published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and letters. According to Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 9.4. PNAS is the second most cited scientific journal, with more than 1.9 million cumulative citations from 2008 to 2018. " Wisdomagic (talk) 14:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add it to the draft which curently displays a single primary source. Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions solved in draft article, thanks!

Thank you for the feedback. I have revised the article to adopt a more neutral tone and removed subjective language. Additionally, I have reworked the "Impact" section to avoid unsupported claims and clarified the details provided with reliable sources. Please let me know if further improvements are needed. RSA-Axp (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with those of course, I resubmitted (not being familiar with wiki procedure I don't know if there is anything else I should do). Wisdomagic (talk) 07:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong 👋

Dear theroadislong, I wrote the draft: Alef (company) article as best as I could, in a more neutral language, and removed any text that might be in favor of the company. But there is a problem. When I was editing the article, I mistakenly deleted the comments and warnings from it. If possible, please forgive me and please put it on my page again. I'm really grateful. Manikingr (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher)@Manikingr: I've handled this. You could have looked in the edit history of the draft and selected a previous version to get the tags. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329

Online events:

New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities
Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024

Announcements from other communities

Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025
Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025

Tip of the month:

Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

draft:kuini

Album the album was rewritten. Can we change the page name to Kuini Album since we notice there is already a Kuini page. Sarahalohi (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

about the album

Sarahalohi (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is possible when the draft is accepted but who is "we" user accounts are strictly single person use. Theroadislong (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]