Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:45, 17 August 2012

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.

Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170
171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180
181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190
191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200
201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210
211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220
221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230
231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240
241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250
251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260
261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270
271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280
281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290
291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300
301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310
311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320
321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330
331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340
341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350
351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360
361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370
371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380
381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390
391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400
401, 402, 403, 404, 405

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Crawford_(pornographic_actress)

PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -138.210.39.148 (talk) 23:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I would like to thank you for adding me to this amazing site. I learn more in ten mins, then I do searching the day away on the internet. It's been a priveledge to be a part of it. I understand that pornstar "acressses" may only be added after winning a major award, and may only be kept for 4 years. Instead of searching one day, on your site, to find me coldly deleted, even when I suspect it's coming this year, I do not wish to cry, blame, or simply pout. It took me 4 years, nominated every year by every comoany,without the proper means of monetary adverting to back, to win what I got. That was the year, After signing for free,to a company owner that as a favor, I moved to vegas Three hours before the AVN awards ceremony that night, and here comes 'MURPHY- to award me as winner. (you know murpheys' law> Years of giving it my all, one moment to find myself unable to move as, that shining moment ever dreamed about, faded away because I gave up too early.

please do not delete me.

Cindy L. Crawford

Actually, the article isn't deleted (at the moment), see: Cindy Crawford (pornographic actress). I do not know from where you got the 4 year keeping period (it isn't the english language Wikipedia, see WP:Pornbio). So. if policy does not change, the article will be kept as long as the servers work. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which means

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Lectonar (talk) 11:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Black Women in Europe Blog

Black Women in Europe Blog · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

deleted as a result of an Expired PROD -83.145.25.80 (talk) 13:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Cordless Larry (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you could contribute. What the article needs, to establish Wikipedia:Notability, is references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There are many links, but some are to the blog itself, some are the blogger herself talking about it, some do not mention it, some are dead. JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Backspace_short_film&pe=1&

BACKSPACE Short Film · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It contains details of the short film made by our team which is also recently been accepted in IMDB -Imoviejunction (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising notice-board. See WP:Notability (films) for what films can have articles, and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for why, even if the film were notable, you should not be the one to write about it here. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

starlight

PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -142.0.225.31 (talk) 03:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What is the name of the page you want restored? Starlight has not been deleted. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glamour Boys Inc.

Glamour Boys Inc. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Vashioneditor (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Also note that Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising; so vanity wording like "prestigious" and "futuristic" will not fly. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:01, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dingoes in Tiaras

Dingoes in Tiaras · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was about a legitimate band that although it is widely unknown, has contributed to the underground scene of Death Metal in Mexico City. Dingoes in Tiaras needs to be recognised by the general community, as other musicians already are. -Bobsmith1000001 (talk) 05:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although dingoes in tiaras are a widely unknown band they are extremely popular in parts of mexico and their music has influenced a whole underground scene in mexico as well as this they have done quite well with their latest single Silly Billy ate my Willy. -220.239.137.58 (talk) 06:46, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CloudCompare

CloudCompare · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

copyright issue cleared with Wylve (1st paragraph will be updated) -Dgirardeau (talk) 19:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Lawrence

Bella Lawrence · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Bella Emma Lawrence -cool school 20:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Not done Although this was a prod, it was also an unreferenced biography of a living person, and perhaps a hoax. I could find no reference about the Cool Middle School or anything reliable for a person called Bella Lawrence. If you can point me to a newspaper article about the person I will reconsider. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded by User:Lyndsayruell

These were discussed at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_February_18#All_images_uploaded_by_User:Lyndsayruell and were temporarily deleted until permission came from the museum. The issue was settled through OTRS and the files that had already moved to Commons were kept on Commons per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AjiMochica.jpg. So I am now requesting the undeletion of the rest of the files so that they can be moved to Commons. Specifically the files:

(list removed, as request has been actioned - collapse boxes interfere with linking to sections lower down the page. JohnCD (talk) 14:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you! - Badseed (talk) 21:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aminur Rahman,Khosru

Aminur Rahman,Khosru. The deletion type was PROD.The reasons why the article should be Undeleted:

a)As per Wikipedia rules the name of Military Persons can be saved If a person have received the highest Military Award or if a person have taken part in an operation and lead the operation: Its clause no 5. The article is written on Aminur Rahman, Khosru who was the youngest commander of Operation jackpot in Mongla on 15th August 1971 in Bangladesh Liberation war.In that operation he lead the operation and the naval commandoes destroyed 6 Foreign Ocean going ship in that operation under his command. This particular military operation comes under the wikipedia regulation of Military persons whos Biography could be saved in Wikipedia. Beside this the Biography has references and sources and these references are included in that Biography which could very well be checked by editors. Due to the above mentioned reason I would request not to delet the article. Regards, --Frankfurt55 (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done please add more references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Morgan Racing

National Sponsorship Manager · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

same as V8 super car team pages as duplicated same style content as Brad Jones Racing -AusTopFuel (talk) 06:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page Darren Morgan Racing looked too much like an advertisement. If you can rewrite this without trying to make the team sound great you can attempt to do so, but there is almost nothing in the deleted page suitable for an encyclopedia. Brad Jones Racing has a suitable stye to follow, so you can use this as an example. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Marco Bitetto

PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Drmarcobitetto 05:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

I was sent two E-Mails stating that my pages will be deleted, but, no comprehensible explanation was given as to why these pages were being deleted.

I would appreciate an explanation as to why these pages were deleted.

I would also like an explanation as to how I my get my pages published on Wikipedia...

Thank you,

Dr. Marco Bitetto

None of your pages have been deleted. Instead the page was moved to User:Drmarcobitetto. This is your own user page, and is a more suitable place to write about yourself. Autobiographies are discouraged as Wikipedia articles. Articles on Wikipedia should be based on published writings, rather on what the writer knows. What you know about this special topic is called original research|. If there are multiple published sources it shows notability. But for your page about yourself there are no published sources.

To get pages to appear here you can read WP:your first article. Pick a topic that you can find published reliable writings on, and then describe the information that you find there.

Not done as page exists. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John D. Caputo Bibliography

John D. Caputo Bibliography · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Recently “John D. Caputo Bibliography” was deleted on the grounds of the overlap with a separate entry “John D. Caputo,” in which part of the same bibliography is contained. Unfortunately, a carefully constructed and accurate bibliography, containing over 150 articles and book chapters published since 1970 was deleted and no longer appears in Wikipedia. This section of the “Bibliography” was only available in the "Bibliography” and not in the separate entry. This is an unfortunate loss. I can certainly understand wanting to merge the two entries. I would have preferred it myself. In the grounds for the deletion, mention was made of possible copyright violations. That I cannot understand. This was a simple bibliography. The compiler simply put publicly available information in one place for the convenience of the readers of Wikipedia. Accordingly, I appeal to the editors to copy the “articles and book chapters” section of the deleted “John D. Caputo Bibliography” and include this section in the main article “John D. Caputo.” I agree that there is no need for a separate "Bibliography" entry. -Jdcaputo (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you talk to user talk:Mark Arsten about John D. Caputo bibliography copyright concerns. Has this bibliography been published elsewhere before? If so if you mark that with CC-BY-SA-3.0 it will enable Wikipedia to make use of it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know much about the finer points of copyrights as they apply to lists, but Moonriddengirl has just weighed in, and it sounds like it's Ok to restore if this is a comprehensive bibliography, and not Ok if it's a selective one or is creatively formatted. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3 Speaker High

3 Speaker High · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am a fan of 3 Speaker High (the music band) and I was given permission by the founder and music producer G. Kaye to create a page using their band's name. I don't know why it was speedily deleted as I did not commit any copywrite infringement or trademark infrigement -3 Speaker High (talk) 02:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done It was a copyright infringement of Billboard 26 Mar 2005 page 29. Admit that you copied it. Anyway you are free to write your own original text on the topic. But we won't restore this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Comedy Button

The Comedy Button · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The administrator deleted this article too early, not enough time for me was given to grow this page. They didn't even tag the page or mark it as a stub, they just went straight ahead and deleted it. No talk (I wasn't notified on my talk page, nor was there any talk on the pages talk page) -∫ A Y ^™ 08:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Appellative marked it as a db-web. So you can ask this user about notification. There was no claim of importance in the article, so it was eligible for speedy deletion. If you like I can turn it into a userspace draft for you to develop. Do you want me to restore it this way? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before You Exit

Before You Exit · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I'm not sure but, at the time this article was deleted I believe it lacked reliable sources of information and citations. Through some research, it is my belief that I have found some new helpful sources. I didn't feel it appropriate to just recreate it after the AfD discussion was closed - valid points were discussed and at the time I agreed. Really I wanted to see if the article could undergo userfication. -Threeperfectdays (talk) 18:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will consider userfying this for you, but contributors at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Before You Exit had looked and failed to find adequate sources. Check out WP:BAND and WP:42; then, if you think you can make an acceptable article, drop a note on my talk page. JohnCD (talk) 14:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy A. Johnson Center fro Philanthropy

Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I believe the article was deleted because the articl had no content. My boss created the title and didn't add anything to it. I'm happy to write the article and state its significance and notability. This Center is much like another organization that is on Wikipedia: Annis Water Resource Institute. I'll follow their lead with content. Thanks. -Nanzerp (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barry Reynolds

Barry Reynolds · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Ready to add references to reliable sources -PeaceWithin (talk) 20:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have reset the ten-day clock on the PROD-blp template: you may remove it when you have added at least one reliable source to confirm what the article says. JohnCD (talk) 14:04, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Headbomb/Information

User:Headbomb/Information · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
User:Headbomb/Sandbox3 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Mistakenly deleted. I think it was transcluding one of my sandbox pages that I {{db-u1}}'d and thus got categorized for deletion. If would also appreciate if someone could undelete User:Headbomb/Sandbox3 which I tagged by mistake. -Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 20:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done, all three pages restored. — ξ ^xplicit 00:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 00:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ramnarayan Rawat

Ramnarayan Rawat · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Ramnarayan Rawat is an expert on Dalits (especially the Chamar community) and his books and his career have been covered in multiple reliable and academic sources. Example. He is also one of the major contributors to the University of Pennsylvania Center for the Advanced Study of India. Before this article was summarily deleted, it had multiple academic sources and news sources and wikilinks to indicate notability.Pectore^talk 23:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC) -Pectore^talk 23:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 06:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Yvorik

PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -James.yvorik (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am sorry to inconvenience you, from looking around at the amount of deletions you have made it appears that you are very busy. I will be short. Matthew Yvorik is my father and was a great man, and he did exist, he wrote two non fiction novels, the grey cloud and Lonely Poland and should be commended for that, as shown in a related wikipedia page, 'The Grey Cloud' many people have contested its proposed deletion as they respect the novel and the author and agree that this is a legitimate page. please undelete this page so that the world can read about the acclaim writer Matthew Yvorik.

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. There is no evidence that this person is in any way notable (many good people were never notable), or that anybody has ever heard of these two books. (Are they non-fiction, or are they novels?) --Orange Mike | Talk 13:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Irate Gamer

The Irate Gamer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Famous video game reviwer on YouTube, a rip-off based on The Angry Video Game Nerd, have many subsribers and is a YouTube Partner. -Egon Eagle (talk) 19:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This was re-created so many times without showing notability that the title has been salted - protected against creation. That was four years ago, so it is possible that he has become notable since. Check out WP:Notability, WP:Notability (people) and WP:42; then, if you think you can show notability, make a draft article in your user space (see Help:Userspace draft for how to do that) and present it at WP:Deletion review. I can userfy the deleted versions for you if you like, but they are not much good and in my opinion you would do better to start from scratch. JohnCD (talk) 12:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is first time on this wp-request, maybe this could help:

Egon Eagle (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Christas

I am a student of Linda Christas Academy, and have been told that someone has deleted our school from Wikipedia on several occasions.

To say that you have not been able to verify LC exists seems ridiculous to me.

Look at the Advisory Board.

What the Wiki editors have said is that they cannot find INDEPENDENT verification. Look at the videos at www.lindachristas.org

There are five thousand students taking courses through Linda Christas in at least four countries, Kenya People's Republic of China, Poland and the United States.

Let's be fair.

Why the only school in the US following the method shown in the motion picture The Blind Side is reduced to being subject to obvious administrative bias is beyond me.

Sincerely,

John Harper, Class of '13 Linda Christas Academy and proud of it, especially because Wikipedia cannot see beyond its nose to the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.135.136 (talk) 00:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. This was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Christas International School so, as stated at the top of this page, it will not be restored here. As the closing administrator is no longer active, the place to make a request is WP:Deletion review. I see that the deletion discussion was marked by extensive sockpuppetry - one person deceptively using many accounts to try to show widespread support: please note that Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shizuo Imaizumi

Shizuo Imaizumi · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

article is factual and supporting documentation can be provided -216.254.121.87 (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Claassen III

Ben Claassen III · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

real person linked to many other articles -128.12.113.147 (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andy_Laode_Abdul_Hasan

Andy Laode Abdul Hasan · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Dark star in ocean (talk) 04:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Laode Abdul Hasan, and that is where you should comment. First, you should read WP:AFD#Contributing to an AfD discussion, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 10:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Madhu_Pandit_Dasa

PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Dcr.manjunath (talk) 06:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Madhu_Pandit_Dasa 2. The article is deleted by some one with any reason; now i want to restore the page

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhu Pandit Dasa, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Phantomsteve (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vetomitin

Vetomitin · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article was deleted due to advertising. Regardless of if the original author would have profited from the page, I would have liked to see some information about the compound. -98.183.186.71 (talk) 02:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist.. I do see that a page by that name was deleted from the German wikipedia (de:Vetomitin) for the reason you say, but you would have to discuss undeletion of it on their site not here on the English wikipedia site. I would expect the request would be denied, because advertising is advertising regardless of what readers might be able to learn from it. On the other hand, editors are usually welcome to create a new article on a topic that meets normal requirements. Using Google, I was able to find some information about this topic, so maybe you'd be able to look up some yourself and write a small article to help others? It is apparently a synonym for (or a specific pharmaceutical preparation of) something called "SkQ1", which is mentioned in our Plastoquinone article. DMacks (talk) 02:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

assino

Assino · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Trying to approve importance -V.artyukhov (talk) 06:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article was removed by speedy deletion, by section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I suppose, that the subject of the article has definite importance. The company is a large trusted 1C Company implemntation partner in Russia, germany and Ukraine. http://translate.google.ru/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsolutions.1c.ru%2Fpartners%2Fpartner.html%3Fpartner_id%3D35908%26autochoice_mode%3D2%26partner_product_id%3D1298%26parent_partner_branch_id%3D-1%26partner_branch_id%3D-1%26partner_reg_code%3Dnull%26partner_city%3Dnull%26partner_task_id%3D2 The company has successfully finished some important implementation projects, collaboraing with Wim Bosman, Remmers, Geze and other large companies. For example, http://translate.google.ru/translate?hl=ru&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.logistics.ru%2F18%2Fi1_4572.htm

I would like to ask you to restore the article or send it to my email or user page if the restoration is impossible.

Best regards.

SysIQ, Inc.

SysIQ,Inc. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article was placed for deletion because it has "no indication of notability neither in the article, nor in the wild" which has no grounds since the article refers to many sources that supports the notability of the subject. Please restore the publication. Thank you! -Godzhesas (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC) Godzhesas (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. The page is at SysIQ, Inc.. Lectonar (talk) 11:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aryogen

AryoGen · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

it is a public notable company in Persian area; since it is going to be international, world patients need some preferal information about the manufacturer and Wikipedia is a good source for international patients. The company is a new 250 million dollar entity and its vital medicines will distribute among 25 contries around the world befor ending the year. -2.177.29.147 (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 298: / Line 298: @@
 [[User:Godzhesas|Godzhesas]] ([[User talk:Godzhesas|talk]]) 11:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 :<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[Image:Yes check.svg|18px]] '''Done''' - as a contested [[Wikipedia:proposed deletion|proposed deletion]], the article has been restored on request.<!-- End Template:UND - p   --> The page is at [[SysIQ, Inc.]]. [[User:Lectonar|Lectonar]] ([[User talk:Lectonar|talk]]) 11:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
+== Aryogen ==
+*{{revisions|AryoGen}}
+<i></i>it is a public notable company in Persian area; since it is going to be international, world patients need some preferal information about the manufacturer and Wikipedia is a good source for international patients. The company is a new 250 million dollar entity and its vital medicines will distribute among 25 contries around the world befor ending the year. -[[Special:Contributions/2.177.29.147|2.177.29.147]] ([[User talk:2.177.29.147|talk]]) 13:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)